PH: 0417 632 464
Ross Walter Nutritionist & Naturopath
  • About
  • Contact
  • Treatments
  • Seminars
  • Programs
  • Articles
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Partners
  • Mentoring
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • Pathology
  • Bookings

COVID check-in app mandatory in hospitality venues (Big Brother is watching you)

9/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
The rona madness in Queensland continues... So we got down to only one new case at the end of the 3-day lockdown period, and the state government relaxed the restrictions to end the lockdown, except that the whole state still needs to wear a mask for another 2 weeks!

Then the Qld government quietly updates their website on the use of its new "Check In Qld" COVID-safe app, used to make it easier and quicker when checking into cafes, restaurants, pubs, businesses and other services using QR codes for contact tracing purposes.

The Qld government have now made the use of the app MANDATORY for all hospitality businesses from May 1st...

Other Aus states have their own similar apps - NSW, WA, and the ACT.

Previously the app was optional and being promoted as a single sign-on with your personal details once, and you just scan the business's QR code and it registers you at that location at that date and time. Now all hospitality businesses MUST use the app for contact tracing. If a customer doesn't have a compatible mobile phone, or doesn't want to use the app, the business must provide alternative options for getting all their contact details (Queensland Government, 2021).

If this app were truly about the health and safety of everyone during the times of COVID, it wouldn't only be used for hospitality businesses! But then again, such a widespread system will be invasive, restrictive, and abused by the government for more than what it is intended for.

The introduction of these new state government tracing apps also shows how pathetic the Federal government's COVID-Safe app is at contact tracing, yet the government wants you to now use BOTH systems together.

The penalties for a business not using the "Check in Qld" app are severe - if a business fails to register for the app by May 1st or doesn't implement this new tracing app, they face a fine of $13,345 or a 6 month holiday in prison (ABC News, 2021).

Queensland Council for Civil Liberties are concerned by the implementation of the app and the lack of laws around the privacy of the data collected, limiting the use or access of the data (such as to police without warrants), or how long the data will be kept before being destroyed. Police in other countries using similar apps have used the data for investigative purposes, which is a huge privacy issue (ABC News, 2021). Also missing from the Qld Gov website is when will the app no longer be needed.

Will the app be used for more contact tracking and tracing at other businesses and services? Yes, the government have confirmed that the app will be used in the future for libraries, banks, SCHOOLS, cinemas, petrol stations, tourism, entertainment venues, and more (ABC News, 2021).

Is this George Orwell's 1984? Big Brother? Or the start of China's social credit system being implemented here? (Constant tracking and monitoring of everyone, facial recognition cameras and software, logging in everywhere, and monitoring and analysis of every conversation, text, email, and social media post, because the government sees you as a threat). Is this really what you want?

The "Check-in Qld" system is too easily broken if people were to not enter their true contact details into the app for privacy reasons... The more the government demand these actions over our lives, the less likely that people will abide by the "rules".

This app and other government interventions are not about improving the health and safety of the population in the alleged pandemic. It's not about health when they are ignoring the most obvious aspects of your immune system, reducing the risks of infections, and anything else that affects your health. This is about control and monitoring of everyone.

Trust not the government.

References:
ABC News. (2021) Check-in Queensland COVID app to be mandatory from May. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/.../qld-covid.../100041132
​
Queensland Government. (2021). Check In Qld app. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from https://www.covid19.qld.gov.au/check-in-qld
0 Comments

Mortality rates in Australia in 2020 were far lower than in previous years. What pandemic?

9/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
The official annual death rates in Australia for 2020 have just been released. The deaths during 2020, the start of the coronavirus pandemic, were a little surprising, as they have actually been much lower than in previous years.
Here's a comparison of the past 5 years data (ABS, 2021a):

Year 2017 deaths: 160,909
Year 2018 deaths: 158,493
Year 2019 deaths: 169,301
Year 2020 deaths: 141,116

(28,000 deaths LESS in 2020 than from 2019)

Some official comments on the 2020 death statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS, 2021a) include:

• 141,116 doctor certified deaths in 2020
• Some substantial differences in death numbers for some causes or diseases, including from cancer and diabetes
• Deaths due to respiratory disease were 16.2% LOWER than historical averages, for both chronic and acute respiratory diseases
• Influenza and pneumonia (a complication of flu and COVID-19) were 36% LOWER than historical averages
• Deaths due to heart diseases were below average for every month of 2020, and 10.7% LOWER than previous averages
• Deaths due to cancer, dementia and diabetes were HIGHER by 4%, 7.3% and 9.1%, no doubt due to reduced hospital access or changes in care due to COVID-19 restrictions
• The year 2020 had the LOWEST death rate of every year since 2009 (ABS, 2021b).

The Australian Government and media: "Nothing to see here..."

(I am reminded of the old "Charter boat" TV advert, for Australians who remember this?! Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UadHCpSjyew)

Stay healthy!

References:
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021a). Provisional Mortality Statistics. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from https://www.abs.gov.au/.../provisional.../jan-dec-2020

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021b). Deaths, Year of registration, Summary data, Sex, States, Territories and Australia. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from http://stat.data.abs.gov.au/Index.aspx...
0 Comments

Controversial or coincidental extension to Queensland's coronavirus state of emergency?

9/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Is it just a coincidence (no, not really, it never is a coincidence) that the Qld coronavirus pandemic "state of emergency" which was declared on 29th January 2020 was to expire on 31st March 2021... that is tomorrow, or 2 days after the latest "outbreak"?!

Now as a result of the latest announcement and lockdowns, the government can extend their emergency powers to continue this scam for longer.

I will repeat - the more people get tested for the coronavirus, the more cases they will find, from people who have no symptoms (and who never get any) because the PCR test is inaccurate and up to 80% of positive results are found to be negative on a retest. That is, 80% of positive results are "false positives", which the fear-mongering government and media will use against everyone to bring about more restrictions and lockdowns. I predicted this would happen as a result of their fear campaign to get more people tested. As a result, just 4 alleged cases amongst 5 million people in a small part of the state, has now affected everyone.

This will all end when 1) we stop getting tested, and 2) stop believing what the government and media are telling you, and 3) you stop letting them get away with this control of your life.

Here's the details of the Qld Government's emergency powers and dates:
​justiceconnect.org.au/resources/how-the-queensland-governments-emergency-restrictions-on-covid-19-work/
0 Comments

Brisbane coronavirus outbreak lockdown and masking

9/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Based on just 4 alleged coronavirus cases here in Brisbane, the city has been locked down - schools closed, businesses shut, people told to stay at home, and masks mandated for the WHOLE STATE!

It is utterly ridiculous to make the whole state of 5 million people over 1.8 million square kilometres and stretching 7000km from the southern border to the top, to wear a mask based on 4 cases! There is NO science to justify this, and plenty of quality studies showing wearing of masks does nothing to stop the spread of respiratory infections or even COVID.

A reminder that despite the mask mandate, it is still dangerous for some people to wear a mask, and hence some people cannot wear a mask. So if you see someone without a mask, please don't launch into a tirade of abuse, but respect their reasons that you know NOTHING about. Leave them be.

In any case, if you are wearing a mask and someone else isn't, you are protected right?! It's nothing to do with you why they aren't wearing one. People are not going to deliberately not wear a mask, knowing the abuse that some people may likely give them.

There are some people exempted from wearing a mask:
1) Children 12 years or younger
2) Those with medically exempt conditions - often respiratory conditions, facial or skin conditions, but also mental health conditions, disabilities (ie deafness or need to communicate with someone with a disability), or many other conditions.

You also do not need proof for not wearing a mask. Some GPs can write a medical certificate letter for this exemption, but it is not needed, according to the Qld Health website.

Police or security or other staff may ask why you aren't wearing a mask, so just say "I have a valid medical exemption for not wearing one, thank you.". They may push their luck and ask for what your exemption is or for proof of the exemption. If you have a medical certificate for exemption, then show them. Even though proof of this is not required (again, according to the Qld Health website) showing proof can diffuse the situation more quickly. However police or security or other staff cannot ask you what your health issue is - that is private between you and your doctors. It is a medical privacy issue, and the reason why medical records are kept under tight security with access only to those who are legally allowed to see them. If asked, just say "I am under no legal obligation to tell you of my medical issues, which is covered by the Commonwealth Privacy Act of 1988".

If you are denied access to shops or services for not wearing a mask or any "No mask, no entry" signs, as there are many people who are misinformed on this issue, ask to speak to their manager. Remind them that refusing access to someone with a health issue and who has a legally valid exemption is breaking the law (Disability Discrimination Act of 1992) and substantial fines and penalties can apply to the person preventing access and to the business or organisation.

If you still get denied access to businesses or organisations or if you feel you are discriminated against for not wearing a mask, report them to the Human Rights Advocates who will contact the business and get them to change their policies based on law: www.humanrightsadvocates.com.au

For more information and links to the Qld Health website on the exemptions, or the other laws mentioned here, please refer to the attached document, or print this and take with you:

drive.google.com/file/d/1SsQeWm8Q0ZREdEGFP8BIRzR1i3hGCYVT/view?fbclid=IwAR0DgFK55vc_XoW-spiyams9TSXdRHssXhVkHfekSopJwKmM3ni_jW6gM6c
0 Comments

The European medicines regulator covered up issues with the Pfizer mRNA covid-19 vaccine

9/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
While most of the news on the COVID-19 vaccines of late has been on the 25-or-more countries who have suspended their use of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine due to serious adverse events and deaths, the alternative Pfizer vaccine hasn't exactly been doing much better. And worse, the medicines regulators, who are supposed to protect the public, have been covering this up...
 
The issues of the Pfizer COVID vaccine haven't officially been made public, as the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the medicines regulator of the European Union, concealed the issues together with Pfizer, that many of their batches were defective and contained unstable or less mRNA than they should have, which may have resulted in a less-effective vaccine that might not provide any protection from the virus. In essence, the EU drug regulator was protecting the Pfizer pharmaceutical company (and shareholders) from any adverse news leaking that their product may not work... instead of protecting the people of Europe.
 
News of the EMA/Pfizer cover-up only broke when hackers accessed the EMA servers in December 2020 and took 40Mb of data, emails, and files and released them to the dark web and to journalists and scientists. One of those journalists published an article in the prestigious British Medical Journal (BMJ) to highlight the issues with the Pfizer quality standards, and the subsequent cover-up by Pfizer and the EMA.
 
The leaked documented showed the following issues with the Pfizer COVID vaccine:
  1. The mRNA sequences were not all complete - with differences in integrity of the mRNA across batches varying by 55-78%, or 22-45% of them were defective
  2. If a mRNA protein is in ANY way damaged or not 100% accurate, it will not work to help a cell to product the correct spike protein that triggers an immune response or antibodies to protect you from the coronavirus
  3. Alternatively, the damaged mRNA in the Pfizer vaccines can still get into cells, and the cells may still use the mRNA to produce a protein, but a damaged one which can cause ANY effect or damage to your health
  4. The BMJ asked all COVID mRNA vaccine manufacturers what is their % of mRNA are intact - none have responded
  5. The EMA knew as early as November 2020 that Pfizer's factories were already producing vaccine batches that did not meet their quality specifications (due to the irregular or damaged mRNA)
  6. The EMA was concerned enough on 23rd November 2020 by the findings that they issued two "major objections" to Pfizer along with other questions to resolve their vaccine production quality issues. Subsequent communications between the EMA and Pfizer on 25th November (2 days later), but unclear as to what testing was done, showed a slight improvement in quality at approximately 70-75% intact mRNA. This still means 25-30% incomplete or damaged mRNA in Pfizer's batches
  7. It was also noted that the medicines regulators do not have any guidelines or standards for making sure the new mRNA vaccines safe and effective or that the manufacturers do the right things in their vaccine development, production and testing
  8. Despite knowing the issues, the EMA still approved the Pfizer vaccine for use and to be given to hundreds of millions of people in Europe, on 21st December 2020, stating on their website that, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (covid-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”. The EMA lied.
​
The leaked documents show that the regulators are not interested in your health or safety, but more into protecting their customers, being the pharma companies who pay big bucks to have their products approved to be given to the public. Major incidents which involve the quality and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines are being ignored or hidden from the public, so as to maintain the pandemic and vaccine sales.
 
The AZ vaccine clearly isn't safe, and the Pfizer vaccine doesn't contain the correct mRNA in up to 30% of batches... And now you know why so many people are having serious adverse events from both these experimental vaccines which have barely had any testing done (which should have found these issues, before they were approved to be given to the public).
 
Issues with the Pfizer vaccine defects should have been big news, but the media have said nothing, unlike for the AZ vaccine. Everyone needs to be made aware of this...
 
References:
 
British Medical Journal. (2021). The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability. Retrieved 26th March 2021 from www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n627
 
Gospa News. (2021). Pfizer Covid-Vaccines with “mRNA Flaws” in EU. Company and EMA concealed, but BMJ discovered. Retrieved 26th March 2021 from www.gospanews.net/en/2021/03/11/pfizer-covid-vaccines-with-mrna-flaws-in-eu-company-and-ema-concealed-but-bmj-discovered/
0 Comments

Vaccine passports were a conspiracy in 2020, now reality

9/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Israel recently became the pilot country to implement a "COVID passport" for proof of a COVID vaccination, in order to live or do anything. The government coercion for the vaccine (which is nationally and internationally illegal, but they still did it) was immense, and made worse with the implementation of the new COVID passport (their "Green Pass") for exclusive access to pretty much all services including buying a coffee, accessing gyms, hotels, concerts, and even buying food at cafes and restaurants being limited to those who have had their COVID shot... Air travel (without quarantine) outside of Israel will be restricted to the vaccinated soon (The Guardian, 2021).

And despite most of the population getting their COVID shot, albeit under extreme pressure, they STILL have to wear a mask, social distance, and other restrictions, even after getting the vaccine! So what's the point?

But now Europe are considering the same. Today, the European Commission were to vote on their own "Green Pass", a similar digital identity document for the purposes of identifying those who have had the COVID vaccine and to allow access to services and travel in the EU (European Commission, 2021).

The EU Green Pass will be used:
1) To show your COVID vaccine status
2) To show your COVID test results - whether you tested positive or negative, or if you have COVID antibodies after recovering from the infection
3) By all other EU states as needed, until the WHO calls and end to the pandemic
4) To facilitate movement (without quarantine) through the EU
5) To store personal information.

The European Commissioner for Justice said that the EU Green Pass "will not be a pre-condition to free movement and it will not discriminate in any way.", but I doubt that this will be their policy long-term, or if this is true at all. Even implementing such a passport to identify one part of the population and not others, and restricting use or access to services IS discriminatory.

I warned you about this in very early 2020, and Facebook fact checked it as false, despite the fact that I referenced press releases from companies who were developing the technology for this and were open about what it was to be used for.

There is still time to stop this medical fascism. Protest as much and loudly as you can, write and speak to your local, state and federal politicians, and anything else you can do to stop this happening. This is discrimination, and it is dividing the community, splitting family and friends, and is illegal coercion to comply without allowing for informed consent (ie, medical tyranny). The right for freedom of movement and access to services is a basic human right, and must be maintained.

Stay healthy!

References:
European Commission. (2021). Coronavirus: Commission proposes a Digital Green Certificate. Retrieved 25th March 2021 from ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_1181
 
The Guardian. (2021). Green pass: how are Covid vaccine passports working for Israel? Retrieved 25th March 2021 from www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/28/green-pass-how-are-vaccine-passports-working-in-israel
0 Comments

Astra-Zeneca vaccine banned or suspended from many countries due to safety concerns and severe adverse reactions

16/3/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
More countries are suspending the AstraZeneca (AZ) COVID-19 vaccine due to serious adverse reactions. It has just been announced that Denmark, Norway and Iceland have suspended the rollout of the AZ vaccine due to many cases of blood clots occurring in patients after their vaccine (BBC News, 2021). While there is no proof yet of how the vaccine causes this, it is a known side effect of this vaccine.
​
Some people have even died after developing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) after receiving a dose of the AZ vaccine (BBC News, 2021). The UK's adverse events database also shows over 41 cases of strokes caused by blood clots, with 6 of them being fatal, after receiving the AZ vaccine. The same database shows another 13 cases of blood clots in the lungs, causing another death, and another 2 dozen cases of other types of blood clots also (UK Government, 2021b).

The AZ vaccine is also the one that Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt had on the weekend, and 2 days later he was in hospital with cellulitis, a serious and potentially life-threatening skin infection. Again, cellulitis is a known serious side effect of the AZ vaccine (see attached table, taken from the UK's adverse events register) (UK Government, 2021b).

Other countries have also banned or suspended the AZ vaccine due to safety concerns, now including Italy and Austria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Luxembourg (BBC News, 2021).
​
Previously, Switzerland banned the AZ vaccine due to safety concerns, and Germany banned it for similar reasons on being used for people over 65 years old.

None of this is entirely surprising really, as the AZ vaccine is causing over 60% more adverse reactions and deaths than the Pfizer vaccine, on a per dose comparison (UK Government, 2021a; UK Government, 2021b).

The media and health authorities have been quick to point out that there is "no evidence" of the COVID vaccines causing these adverse events. But, vaccines are the leading cause of coincidences!

Stay healthy!

References:

BBC News. (2021). Oxford-AstraZeneca: EU says 'no indication' vaccine linked to clots. Retrieved 12th March 2021 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56357760

UK Government. (2021a). COVID-19 mRNA PfizerBioNTech vaccine analysis print. Retrieved 9th February 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/.../COVID-19...

UK Government. (2021b). COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print. Retrieved 12th March 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/.../COVID-19...
0 Comments

a one world diet attempts to save the planet and feed the world but will cause more nutrient deficiencies and disease

16/3/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
In 2019, I wrote a series of articles to critique the EAT-Lancet Commission report, on a proposed new "one world diet" which alleged to save the environment as well as feeding the world. It sounds like a great plan, except it had some massive holes and wouldn't work to achieve either goal. You can read my earlier articles on this plan here:

http://www.rosswalter.com.au/art.../category/eat-lancet-diet

The initial report received wide media coverage and praise until some independent investigations (including from me) found the the proposed new diet was woefully deficient in multiple nutrients (include vitamin B12, vitamin D, vitamin K, sodium, potassium, calcium, iron, omega-3 fats, protein and amino acids, and more!) which was not sustainable for anyone to avoid health conditions.

The EAT-Lancet diet was in effect an optional-almost-no-meat, plant-based diet, but included manufactured or highly processed plant-based foods. The extremely low animal products would comprise 1/5 of an egg, 2/3 of a fish finger, 1/4 of a rasher of bacon, 1/16 of a burger pattie, or 1.5 chicken nuggets! And even then, animal-based foods are optional! No wonder it was so nutrient deficient! A subsequent investigation into the financial requirements of the EAT-Lancet diet concluded that approximately 1.5 BILLION of the world's 7 billion population today would not be able to afford the EAT-Lancet diet! (Hirvonen, Bai, Headey & Masters, 2019). The EAT-Lancet new world diet was a failure.

EAT-Lancet is an interesting collaboration of the EAT Foundation Group, founded by a billionnaire vegan couple, and The Lancet, a medical and scientific journal. The EAT-Lancet Commission and report was funded by The Wellcome Trust, a charity with pharmaceutical company roots (Eat Forum, 2019). Almost all of the report's authors and contributors were vegans - it was a highly biased group, and their report showed this. The group is attempting to meet the Umited Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement (for climate change) (EAT-Lancet Commission, 2021).

Recently, EAT-Lancet group is back with a new report, full of wonderful quotes and proposals, which deserve to be investigated again, so here are some key points:

• They make many unsubstantiated claims why the future of the planet is dire if we don't all make huge changes to the food supply system and improving nutrition for everyone. They claim that a diet rich in plant-based foods and fewer animal sources will improve health and environmental benefits. But offers no scientific references to back this claim.
• They make no differentiation between organic or grass-fed animal sources of food, versus factory-raised (and grain-fed and other garbage-fed) animals or processed meats, which can give significant differences in health.
• They forget that animals IMPROVE the soil with nutrients and bacteria, and even sequester more "carbon" into the soil (and meat) from the air than what they give out. They also forget that roaming animals do not need vast clearing of native forests, unlike mass mono-plant agriculture (ie, plant farming is more damaging to the environment, than animal farming).
• They make no differentiation between highly processed factory-produced plant sources of food (ie plant protein, soy, GMOs etc) and fresh, whole plant foods.
• They make no mention of the huge transportation issues of getting plant foods to people, or encouraging many people with gardens to grow their own foods!
• Their dietary recommendations are still based on useless calories, but it can be used as a good comparison, for example they recommend 811 calories PER DAY from grains (wow! An epidemic of Diabetes here we come), 78 calories from vegetables, 153 calories from dairy (and never mind the many cultures who traditionally haven't accessed or consumed dairy, and shouldn't), just 30 calories from beef, lamb and pork, 62 from chicken, 19 from eggs (remember just 1/5 of one!), a huge 284 calories from legumes (and again many can't tolerate these or the pea protein powder it mostly comes from), and a whopping 354 from unsaturated plant-based oils, and even 120 calories PER DAY from sugar.
• Their aim is to double the consumption of plant-based foods (except starchy vegetables which are to be limited, despite them being rich source of fibre...), limit red meat (highly nutrient-dense), and with eggs, chicken and dairy being optional.
• Reducing food waste is a goal too, and a good one as up to 45% of food produced is wasted or thrown out because of picky choosing by supermarkets and other food companies, limited resources for picking or processing, not being consumed quickly enough, or other causes. However reducing waste is a much later goal, when it should be done first...

The EAT-Lancet Commission haven't learnt from their earlier failure - no change has been done to their original plan to fix the issues with their "new world diet", to correct the obvious and highly damaging nutrient deficiencies that are present in it. On one hand the report says it is about trying to improve food quality and quantity to feed everyone in a sustainable way, but doesn't actually provide the nutrients it claims.

With all the other political and health agendas going on at the moment and for the past 12 months, this is another part of it. A committee of a few people cannot realistically come up with a plan that will address or fix the entire planet or improve the health of the entire population. These co-called experts did a terrible job of putting together the original report and the "study" of their proposed "one world diet" being the EAT-Lancet diet, with massive issues that were found by independent investigations, but still haven't been fixed 2 years later. I'm sure these experts won't personally be relying on 1/5 of an egg for their daily animal-based protein intake...

This is a plan for CAUSING chronic nutrient deficiencies and disease in the ENTIRE population, while pretending to save the planet and improve health. Pretty much the same as another agenda going on at the moment...

Yes the food supply needs improving in many ways, but this diet or plan is not the way it can be done.
​
Stay healthy!

#foodcanfixit #fktheEATLancetdiet #fkthenewworlddiet

References:

EAT Forum. (2019). How was the EAT-Lancet Commission funded? Retrieved 8th March 2021 from https://eatforum.org/eat-lancet.../eat-lancet-funding/

EAT-Lancet Commission. (2021). Healthy Diets From Sustainable Food Systems: Summary Report from the EAT-Lancet Commission. Retrieved 6th March 2021 from https://eatforum.org/content/uploads/2019/01/EAT-Lancet_Commission_Summary_Report.pdf
​

Hirvonen, K., Bai, Y., Headey, D., & Masters, W.A. (2019). Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis. The Lancet, 8 (1), E59-E66. Doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4
0 Comments

To fix health issues you must find and fix the root causes

16/3/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
I was recently interviewed by a colleague/lecturer for his podcast channel, on a topic of my choice - of a particular health topic that is a passion for me, and something unique... On the issue of finding and treating the root causes of all health conditions!

While this might not sound that unusual, most people don't really undersand this, or why their health issues aren't getting better despite having medical or alternative treatments.

Hippocrates, the father of modern medicine (and also of Naturopathic medicine) stated in his famous principles (amongst several others) to:

1) Treat the causes
2) Treat the whole body.

What people don't understand that this is not, and hasn't been for a LONG time, the medical model! The modern medical model is to:
​
1) Diagnose a condition after investigation of symptoms and testing
2) Treat the condition or symptoms with surgery or medications that remove or hide the symptoms
3) Treat everyone with that diagnosed condition or symptom the same!

How did the medical model get so far removed from the principles of Hippocrates?

The medical model can only "manage" your symptoms or conditions, and not actually treat them. Prescribed medications only hide symptoms but not actually fix the causes of them (because the causes are never investigated or found), so that symptoms are (sometimes) kept at bay only while you take the medications, but symptoms will return as soon as you stop taking them.

Prescribed medications also:

1) Push the issues deeper into the body and can cause worse symptoms over time, as the root causes are not treated
2) Cause side effects - ie, other symptoms, for which they will simply prescribe more medications to hide, which in turn cause more symptoms... Welcome to the pharmaceutic merry-go-round
3) Cause nutrient deficiencies, as medications often affect normal metabolic or digestive processes, leading to nutrient deficiencies, which in turn cause more symptoms and side effects.

In contrast, what I do is undertake a thorough and detailed investigation into all of your health issues, diet analysis of excesses vs deficiencies, lifestyle factors (stress, exercise, sleep), digestive system function, hormones, physical signs and symptoms, pathology analysis, and more!

I have developed a "root cause analysis prototol" which I then use to identify all of YOUR root causes as well as key symptoms that need treating, and put a treatment plan and recommendations together to quickly improve how you feel, as well as fixing all the root causes, which will return you to health and prevent issues into the future! In doing this, I am treating the whole body, as per Hippocrates' principles. It is a very different approach, but it works! Hence why I specialise in complex and chronic health issues, because I can find the root causes and get results, where doctors and other practitioners do not help you to improve.

Many times, the root causes can be very simple and easy to fix! But the root causes vary from one person to the next, even for people with the same diagnosed condition. Everyone is different!

If you are not happy with the progress of your "treatment", or if you feel that the root causes are not being found or treated, then please contact me for an investigation and advice that is specific to you! It is MOST important to find and fix the root causes, in order for you to get your health back, and to achieve your health goals!

Listen to my interview on the importance of finding and treating the root causes, now on the Humanley website:

https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode22

OR listen on Spotify;

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0AZxXvVogMQK8sKwwBXcri

Stay healthy!
0 Comments

Australia's TGA bans doctors from telling you which COVID-19 vaccine you will get

27/2/2021

7 Comments

 
Picture
Australia's medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), being a government organisation and therefore they do what the government tells them to do, has announced that they are banning health providers, doctors and pharmacists from revealing which COVID vaccine that people will get (News.com.au, 2021; TGA, 2021c).
 
The TGA are supposed to be responsible for ensuring that medicines etc are safe and effective, and protecting the Australian population from unsafe products. They are supposed to work for US.
 
Sadly the TGA have shown their true colours in this pandemic, starting back in early February 2020, when they released a warning to all health practitioners (medical and alternative) to not recommend any treatments or preventions for the coronavirus, unless there was specific published evidence for their use against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (TGA, 2020). They ignored and effectively banned many existing and effective antiviral and immune supporting preventions and treatments from being used, thus potentially killing many Australians as a result.
 
As the federal government promised to buy tens of millions of doses of COVID vaccines from different suppliers, all of them before those companies actually completed their clinical trials, the TGA recently granted PROVISIONAL approval for the use of the Pfizer and AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccines. This was despite the limited and pathetic testing done, and no independent testing being done by the TGA, the current vaccine rollout is still part of the TGA's ongoing investigations into the vaccines. Basically, the vaccine rollout is STILL part of the clinical trial (ie, experiment or testing) of the vaccines! And we are the lab rats.
 
The TGA also recently announced an unusual relaxing of labelling requirements to the COVID vaccines and packaging, to remove the vaccine name and manufacturer, as well as other warning and "POISON" notices that normally apply to vaccines (TGA, 2021a). We were told that this was because the initial vaccines would be imported into Australia wouldn't meet the TGA's requirements of labelling. That could have been easily fixed by the manufacturers printing new labels, but with their latest announcement of hiding the vaccine name from patients, it makes more sense that they were planning to hide the vaccine name all along.
 
I heard a RACGP (professional association for GPs) representative in a TV interview last week saying that health professionals in NSW would get the Pfizer vaccine, and everyone else will get the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine. But according to official government statistics from the UK, the Oxford/AZ vaccine is causing over 67% more serious adverse reactions and deaths than the Pfizer vaccine (UK Government, 2021a; UK Government, 2021b). Hands up if you want to get the more dangerous one? No-one? That's why they don't want you to know which one you will get...
 
The Pfizer vaccine is available in Australia but only in limited numbers - 10 million doses, compared to over 50 million doses each for the Oxford/AZ and Novavax vaccines (Australian Government Department of Health, 2021). It seems that the Pfizer vaccine is for the "special" people, but the far more dangerous Oxford/AZ vaccine will be for everyone else.
 
The TGA are now threatening doctors and medical clinics with huge fines and jail to prevent them from advertising which vaccine they have, the brand name, the ingredients (ie mRNA or other vaccine) or other information which may enable consumers to identify the particular vaccine.
 
Even worse is that the TGA have also banned health clinics and pharmacies from implying that the vaccines can cause harm (News.com.au, 2021). So they are banning "informed consent" to people to actually help them decide if they should get this vaccine or not? The human right of informed consent for medical treatments (in the Australian Constitution) says that informed consent MUST be given for someone to make a voluntary decision without coercion, to decide on any medical treatment or therapy. The TGA are (again) acting illegally here.
 
The TGA have a database for recording vaccine reactions and side effects, called the Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN). Actually they have TWO adverse events databases, with one internal system called AEMS (Adverse Event Management System) which records adverse event reports, but only after a period of 3 months does this internal-only data get transferred to the publicly-available DAEN database (TGA 2021b). Luckily other countries make their vaccine adverse reactions and deaths data available immediately so we can see how bad they are - although only a fraction of adverse events or deaths are reported, as the process is voluntary and doctors don't often add to it. Also, if you don't know which vaccine you get, how can you report an adverse event? Was this part of their plan all along?
 
Does this sound like the TGA are acting for the benefit of the Australian public and their health? Do you think that your government really cares about you or your health? Of course not. Are you still keen to line up for your Russian roulette shot of the more dangerous version of the COVID vaccine?
 
Stay healthy!
 
 
References:
 
Australian Government Department of Health (2021). Australia’s vaccine agreements. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.health.gov.au/node/18777/australias-vaccine-agreements
 
Newscorp. (2021). TGA bans pharmacies from revealing which COVID-19 vaccine they offer. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/tga-bans-pharmacies-from-revealing-which-covid19-vaccine-they-offer/news-story/8bcf3dea974537050600d7f87eb8e13c
 
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2020). Warning about products claiming to treat or prevent the novel coronavirus. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/warning-about-products-claiming-treat-or-prevent-novel-coronavirus
 
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021a). Therapeutic Goods (Poisons Standard) (COVID-19 Vaccine-Pfizer) Labelling Exemption 2021.
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021b). Reporting Adverse Events. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/reporting-adverse-events
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021c). Advertising COVID-19 vaccines to the Australian public. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/advertising-covid-19-vaccines-australian-public?fbclid=IwAR0pl0FqOjRLM0eQwaZV5GiVLJen_2V1gVwo9RmCld5pJO7KCVVJrw-sMlc
UK Government. (2021a). COVID-19 mRNA PfizerBioNTech vaccine analysis print. Retrieved 9th February 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/964207/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print__1_.pdf
UK Government. (2021b). COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print. Retrieved 9th February 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/964208/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print__2_.pdf
 
7 Comments

COVID-19 vaccinations started in Australia

27/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
So the COVID vaccinations started here in Australia this week...
 
I have tried over the past 12 months to show you that there are many factors which can lead to an increased risk of this infection, and what you can do about preventing and treating it. The main risk factor is a low functioning immune system, which is the result of many possible factors too. I've been saying all along - improve your immune system function to prevent the coronavirus infection and also reduce any risks of complications and to reduce severity.
 
If you aren't at least a little bit suspicious of the goings-on over the past 12 months, then there's not a lot more that I can do to help you! Let's just review some important questions and answers about the new COVID vaccines:
 
Will getting the COVID shot be safe? NO! (thousands have died from the vaccine, especially in the elderly and other age groups that have no mortality from the virus itself)
Will getting the COVID shot get rid of the virus? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot reduce COVID incidence rates? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot improve the herd immunity rate? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot improve your immune system? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot stop you from getting the coronavirus infection? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot stop you from passing it onto others? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot stop you from dying? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot remove the need to wear a mask? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot remove the need to social distance? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot remove the need for lockdowns? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot get rid of the need to use QR codes to check in everywhere? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot reduce business closures (or enable businesses to open again)? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot get rid of the travel bans? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot improve the survival rate from COVID of 99.9%? NO!
 
If you are still keen on the vaccine after reading this (and my many other articles) then all I can say is "Good luck!". Ideally you should undertake a preparation period before this (or any) vaccine of at least 2 weeks to improve immune system function and detox pathways, and continue a post-vax protocol for about 4 weeks afterwards, to reduce any risks of complications. 
 
So why are we being told to put all our faith in these new and experimental vaccines, if nothing else will change? Because the pandemic is not about a virus, (which has a 99.9% survival rate of the very few who actually get it) but an excuse to implement social changes and total control and monitoring.
 
Why would you want to get this experimental (ie "untested to normal scientific standards") vacine when NOTHING will change after getting it? (Yes I really want to know!)
 
Stay healthy!
0 Comments

This is not a real pandemic (Part 2)

27/2/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
I wrote my list of "This isn't a real pandemic" observations of events some months ago, which can be found here: http://www.rosswalter.com.au/articles/this-is-not-a-real-pandemic. A lot has changed since then but some things are still the same, that this still isn't a real pandemic. Because:
  • A real pandemic doesn't need social media platforms to censor posts that are repeating official news sources, or published research studies or statistical analyses that question the official narrative (ABC News, 2021)
  • A real pandemic doesn't require Police to visit the homes of people who question the official narrative on social media to silence them
  • A real pandemic doesn't need to give lessons in schools to brainwash children into not believing any anti-government information such as anti-vax beliefs (Ilford Recorder News, 2021)
  • A real pandemic doesn't need a marketing plan and advertising blitzes (also known as propaganda) to encourage people to get the vaccine, such as Australia's $24 million media campaign (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021a)
  • A real pandemic doesn't need to give medical clinics and doctors financial incentives to encourage their patients (with coercion, which is illegal) to get vaccinated, with Australia's doctors set to make up to $49.50 per person (plus $10 per person to the medical clinic) for a total of $ 1,528,006,886 (over $1.5 BILLION) to vaccinate every Australian (Australian Government, 2021)
  • A real pandemic doesn't need to offer financial incentives to encourage the general public (aka, "bribes") to get the vaccine
  • A real pandemic doesn't need to pay celebrities to appeal to people in marketing campaigns to get the vaccine
  • A real pandemic doesn't have nurses, doctors, celebrities or politicians needing to fake getting the vaccine live on TV, to encourage people to think it's safe and to get it too (yes we saw the needle was empty, or the plunger not pushed in, or the needle cap was on...)
  • A real pandemic doesn't cover up the death of a nurse who got the vaccine live on TV then collapsed shortly afterwards when interviewed, because you weren't supposed to see that happen and they still want you to get the vaccine
  • A real pandemic doesn't need to call sudden lockdowns and restrictions based on ONE random case after weeks or months without any cases or deaths
  • A real pandemic doesn't need to mandate wearing of masks suddenly across a state or nation, again when one case is identified after weeks or longer without incidences, especially when wearing of masks was actively discouraged at the height of incidences and deaths in the early months of the pandemic
  • A real pandemic doesn't need restrictions being placed on everyone, to protect the 0.1% who are at risk - being elderly people with more than one health chronic health condition
  • A real pandemic doesn't allow tens of thousands of people to congregate at large scheduled sporting matches (football, cricket, tennis etc) but not allow more than a few people at your home or in a shop at the same time
  • A real pandemic doesn't need you to scan a QR code and enter your real or fake contact details so your movements can be traced, in order to enter shops, buy food, or use services
  • A real pandemic doesn't require a "vaccine passport" to prove you had the vaccine, in order to travel, attend school, attend work, use government services, eat at a cafe or get money from your own account at a bank...
  • A real pandemic doesn't need governments to indemnify pharmaceutical companies from legal liability and lawsuits, from adverse reactions or deaths that the vaccines are known to cause (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021b)
  • A real pandemic doesn't need insurance companies to indemnify doctors and other health professionals from legal liability and lawsuits from adverse reactions or deaths that the vaccines can cause
  • A real pandemic doesn't need deliberate fear-mongering by politicians or the media, for a virus with more than a 99% survival rate (remember the early videos in China of people just collapsing in the street and dying?! That only happened there, as the start of the fear campaign)
  • A real pandemic would have governments and health officials telling people the truth and giving more practical advice to prevent and treat the infection by improve the immune systems of everyone, which can be done naturally, easily, and cheaply. Improving the strength and function of your immune system is the major factor which will protect you from this virus..
Hence this still isn't a real pandemic. It is a PLANdemic.
Be informed. Be empowered. Question everything. And stay healthy!
 
References:
ABC News. (2021). Facebook to take down all false vaccine claims, not just those related to coronavirus. Retrieved 12th February 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-09/facebook-to-take-down-false-vaccine-claims/13134828

Australian Government. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Retrieved 12th February 2021 from https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/01/covid-19-vaccine-rollout-expression-of-interest-for-primary-care-participation-in-phase-1b_1.pdf

Ilford Recorder News. (2021). Lessons in schools to counter the anti-vaxxers. Retrieved 12th February 2021 from https://www.ilfordrecorder.co.uk/news/education/school-lesson-designed-to-explain-vaccine-7320540

Sydney Morning Herald. (2021a). COVID-19 vaccine advertising campaign to target specific fears. Retrieved 12th February from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/covid-19-vaccine-advertising-campaign-to-target-specific-fears-20210109-p56svi.html
​
Sydney Morning Herald. (2021a). Vaccine suppliers given indemnity for 'inevitable' side effects. Retrieved 12th February from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/morrison-government-grants-indemnity-for-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-20201008-p5636o.html
1 Comment

Coronavirus pandemic update on COVID-19 vaccines - Wk1 FEb 2021

8/2/2021

2 Comments

 
Picture
Here's a summary on the COVID-19 vaccine situation around the world...
​
The pharmaceutical giant Merck has abandoned its two COVID-19 vaccine trials, after studies showed very little effectiveness of their vaccine (Merck, 2021). The manufacturer, in their news release, said that the vaccines produced LESS immune responses than compared to a NATURAL infection, and less than other COVID-19 vaccines, leading to their decision to scrap their trials and vaccine production.

The Oxford University/Astra Zeneca vaccine is undergoing human trials in the UK. While most of the other COVID vaccine manufacturers saved a lot of time in vaccine development by skipping the typically-required animal testing, the Oxford vaccine has been doing animal trials anyway.

The Oxford vaccine animal trials found that ALL of the monkeys became infected with COVID-19 when challenged after the vaccination. There was no difference in the viral load or symptoms between the vaccinated group and the un-vaccinated group. The antibody levels produced from the vaccine was very low, hence the vaccine did not prevent animals catching the virus. The vaccine did NOT work (van Doremalen et al., 2020). More of a concern was that the study, by the Oxford scientists themselves, was that "viral shedding" of the coronavirus was NOT reduced in the vaccinated animals. This is proof that the Oxford vaccine actually "sheds" in mucus which can then infect other people to spread the genetically-modified virus - from the vaccine.

The scientists performing the animal trial suggested that if similar results were found in human trials, "the vaccine would be unlikely to reduce transmission in the wider community".

Animal trials often show problems with vaccines (or medications) well before they get to human trials. Many vaccines and medications never make it to human trial stage, because of poor efficacy or from causing too many problems (ie, side effects) in animals.

The lack of animal trials is a massive safety issue when very new vaccines or medications are being developed. Animal trials are also contentious and perceived as unethical or cruel, but then again so is trialling such new vaccines or medications in humans.

The Oxford/AZ vaccine was meant to be one of the major vaccines being offered, so much so that the Australian government bought a huge number of doses... well before trials had finished (ABC, 2020a).

Switzerland, however, has now banned (or "not authorised") the Oxford/AZ COVID vaccine because of a lack of evidence of effectiveness (Express, 2021). This was confirmed with the German vaccine committee research team finding that it is only 8% effective in those over 65 years of age, and therefore the Oxford/AZ vaccine will not be recommended to adults over 65 years in Germany (Tio, 2021; ABC, 2021b).

Pfizer has been having issues with their vaccine too... Pfizer applied for "emergency use authorisation" for its mRNA vaccine to be given in India, after the country's medicines regulator requested further information and a local trial to confirm the vaccine's safety and efficacy. Pfizer declined to undertake these further investigations into their vaccine and withdrew their application (CNBC, 2021).

The Centres of Disease Control (CDC) in the US on their own website report a published study that Israel had a surge in coronavirus incidences at the same time as the Pfizer vaccine was approved and being given to people. Many people working in healthcare in Israel developed COVID-19 from 1-10 days after vaccination. At the start of the Pfizer vaccine rollout, Israel have a COVID-19 positive test rate of 4.4% of the population (Times of Israel, 2020), but this nearly doubled to 7% of the population just over 1 month later as more people got the Pfizer vaccine (CDC, 2021; World of Meters, 2021). Clearly the Pfizer vaccine is NOT working! The Israeli study found that the Pfizer vaccine efficacy is only 52%, not their reported 95%! Hence they say that even immunised persons can still develop COVID-19.

Ironically, China are also developing their own vaccine. The Chinese COVID vaccine from CanSino Biologics showed 81% adverse events in their clinical trials, with 17% of them being classified as "serious" adverse reactions. This is a different type of vaccine, similar to the AZ/Oxford type and using a genetically-modified adenovirus type 5 virus (Corvelva, 2021). The very high amount of adverse events is very concerning.

That concludes the roundup of the world's COVID vaccine news. With not a lot being positive news (unless you count the various countries stopping some of the vaccines being used on their populations). There's no evidence yet of any slowing of COVID incidences or deaths from any country, despite many millions of vaccines being given. Will wait and see for more studies or statistics to come out... In the meantime, support your immune system!

Stay healthy!

References:

Amit, S., Beni, S.A., Biber, A., Grinberg, A., Leshem, E., & Regev-Yochay, G. (2021). Post-Vaccination COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers, Israel.
 
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2020a). Australia orders 84 million doses of coronavirus vaccine for massive free roll-out next year. Retrieved 7th February 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-06/free-coronavirus-vaccine-to-be-made-available-throughout-20212/12635174
 
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2020b). Germany questions efficacy of AstraZeneca vaccine in the elderly. Retrieved 7th February 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-29/germany-questions-efficacy-of-astrazeneca-vaccine-in-the-elderly/13101658
 
CNBC. (2021). Pfizer withdraws application for emergency use of its Covid-19 vaccine in India. Retrieved 7th February from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/05/pfizer-withdraws-application-for-emergency-use-of-its-covid-19-vaccine-in-india.html
 
Corvelva. (2021). Covid-19 vaccine: 81% of the clinical trial volunteers had reactions to the vaccine. Retrieved 7th February 2020 from https://www.corvelva.it/en/approfondimenti/notizie/covid19/vaccino-covid-19-l-81-dei-volontari-della-sperimentazione-clinica-ha-avuto-reazioni-al-vaccino.html

 
Express. (2021). Switzerland bans AstraZeneca vaccine for ALL citizens as Europe declares war on UK jab. Retrieved 5th February 2021 from https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1392962/eu-vaccine-latest-astrazeneca-switzerland-ban-oxford-vaccine-uk-latest
 
Merck. (2021). Merck Discontinues Development of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates; Continues Development of Two Investigational Therapeutic Candidates. Retrieved 3rd February 2021 from https://www.merck.com/news/merck-discontinues-development-of-sars-cov-2-covid-19-vaccine-candidates-continues-development-of-two-investigational-therapeutic-candidates/
 
Times of Israel. (2020). Daily virus cases surpassed 3,000 on Sunday, with 4.4% of tests positive. Retrieved 7th February 2020 from https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog-december-21-2020/
 
Tio. (2021). Dubbi sul vaccino di AstraZeneca: «Efficacia solo dell'8% sugli over 65». Retrieved 7th February from https://www.tio.ch/dal-mondo/attualita/1488779/vaccino-astrazeneca-dubbi-over-efficacia
 
van Doremalen, M., Lambe, T., Spencer, A., Belij-Rammerstorfer, S., Purushotham, J.N. Port, J.R., Avanzato, V., Bushmaker, T., Flaxman, A., Ulaszewska, M., Feldmann, F., Allen, E.R., Sharpe, H., Schulz, J., Holbrook, M., Okumura, A., Meade-White, K., Pérez-Pérez, L., Bissett, C., Gilbride, C., Williamson, B.N., Rosenke, R., Long, D., Ishwarbhai, A., Kailath, R., Rose, L., Morris, S., Powers, C., Lovaglio, J., Hanley, P.W., Scott, D., Saturday, G., de Wit,  E., Gilbert,  S.C., Munster, V.J. (2020). ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques, bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.13.093195
 
World of Meters. (2020) Coronavirus cases. Retrieved 6th February 2021 from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
 
2 Comments

Body autonomy rights - your body your decision your health

8/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Body autonomy is the right of every person to make their own decisions about their body without external influence or coercion.
​
Body Autonomy particularly relates to health and medical decisions, and is incredibly relevant today in this alleged mandatory vaccine environment.

The constitutions of many countries or laws of many states or countries support body autonomy, and especially so in Australia where our constitution specifically makes it illegal for any medical treatment to be mandated, forced or even coerced without voluntary choice based on full informed consent of the risks vs benefits.

Some politicians have stated that COVID vaccinations will be mandatory, and others have said that restrictions will be placed on those who choose not to take the vaccine. Such restrictions have said to include the ability to travel, work in government services, access government services and benefits, attending government buildings, being able to work in private companies, get healthcare, attend movies or even eat in restaurants or drink in bars.

I warned about "digital COVID passports" being developed in early 2020, and now many companies are jumping on board to develop this technology, to track and monitor everyone, everywhere. This coronavirus plandemic is just the excuse to bring in these new laws that ignore and trample all over your rights.

You cannot let politicians make illegal decisions like this that ignore the constitutions and laws of countries. You must stand up against this tyranny.

It's your body, your decision, your rights, and your health. And someone else's body is their decision too.
0 Comments

Far more people die from starvation than the coronavirus

8/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Over 4 million people in 2020 died from hunger (twice as many as COVID-19, but nothing being done about this), with around 9 million dying every year from a lack of food (Global Nutrition Report, 2015). There’s a vaxxine for starvation. It’s called food.

Ironically, improved nutrition is also the vaxxine against COVID-19, helping the immune system work better against this infection, as it does for any new infection that the body hasn't seen before.

The trillions of dollars spent on COVID-1984 could feed all humans for hundreds of years. Yet, millions of people are being thrown into abject poverty, hunger, malnutrition and destitution because of this pandemic BS. All to develop an unnecessary vaxxine which is injuring and killing more people than the virus truly is.

COVID-19 is a respiratory condition with a mortality rate of 0.01% - 0.03% of those who actually get sick from it. And only 0.3% of the total population who get tested are deemed as "positive", and many don't get any symptoms due to a high false positive rate. Hence the actual true mortality rate is very, very low. In Australia it is just 0.0003% of the population (World of Meters, 2021). Even that result is based on dodgy PCR testing and ridiculous death classifications.

What a pathetic joke.

Wake Up.
​
0 Comments

Wearing a mask doesn't work to prevent the coronavirus, so lets try wearing 2 or even 3 masks

8/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
I have published some articles showing how ineffective masks are at either stopping transmission of any respiratory infection (including the coronavirus) or preventing you from getting it (or any other respiratory infection). Those articles were fully referenced from published studies, even showing the poor effectiveness of different masks for the coronavirus specifically.

In a pathetic attempt to make masking work, some alleged health officials are talking about "double-masking" or wearing of 2 masks, one on top of another to try and make it more difficult for a tiny virus to pass through 2 flimsy pieces of fabric instead of just one!

Then some other idiot health officials suggested "why not 3?"! As usual, the brainless media have already started promoting this idea as a great new step we must take to be free of the virus! (see attached photos). Why not then wear 10 masks?!

Where is the evidence of 75% or 90% effectiveness of wearing multiple masks? I would claim otherwise that multi-masking is 75-90% effective in reducing the ability to actually breathe... but who needs oxygen anyway?

Many people have found it difficult to wear even one mask, for many health reasons, and should not be required to wear one because they do make breathing more difficult. Also that the masks become lovely breeding grounds for opportunistic bacteria and fungi/moulds very quickly from the warmth and moist breath within minutes... which can increase the risk of more respiratory infections.

If double and triple-masking is recommended, would people need 2 or 3 medical exemptions, one for each mask?!

In another crazy recommendation seen recently, a swimming pool is recommending that people must wear a mask IN THE POOL! Can you imagine the difficulty with breathing if you are swimming laps with a WET mask stuck to your mouth and nose? I hope the pool has good insurance because people are likely to die from this stupid and dangerous advice.

Like these photos, this coronavirus circus is a joke.

Or you could just not wear a mask and support your immune system better to fight this and any other winter respiratory infection, which happens in the colder months for most people every year...
​
Stay healthy!
0 Comments

The coronavirus is a killer, of human rights

8/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
COVID-19 is a killer.

Mainly of older people with existing chronic health conditions, sadly.

But COVID-19 is also a killer of:
​
- the common cold and flu
- heart disease
- cancer.

Due to incidences from these conditions being classified as "COVID-19" or deaths from these being classified as a "COVID death".

COVID-19 is also a killer of:
- common sense
- thinking
- logic
- science. Science died in 2020. RIP.

In the wider community, COVID-19 has killed:

- the working class
- millions of businesses and jobs
- many world economies.

Between people, COVID-19 has killed:

- human connections
- socialisation
- relationships and friendships
- compassion
- free speech
- autonomy
- trust in the media, governments and medicine
- human rights
- hope
- love.

But these can be turned around! Look after yourself, your health and your family. Stand up for yourself, and do what is or feels right for YOU.
We can get our lives and world back again, and it will be better than before!
0 Comments

The coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic 12 months on

8/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
One year ago (on 22-2-2020), I first started posting about the coronavirus! Wow, hasn't that 12 months gone fast?! And haven't things changed? But not for the better I believe.
​
I started writing my coronavirus-related articles to help people to prevent getting this new infection by improving their immune systems and to enable it to do what it is supposed to do - fight infections!

Only for our drugs regulator (the TGA) to warn all health practitioners in Australia to NOT give any health advice or recommendations to prevent the new virus! They said that there was no evidence of any treatment, product or recommendation being effective, so we couldn't tell you about them. Never mind that the same natural treatments have been shown to be effective against all other viral infections in the past! I changed the wording of my articles to focus more on your immune system but being careful (or ambiguous!) to still give advice.

Luckily more and more evidence was published from studies showing the benefits of vitamin C, vitamin D, zinc, many herbal medicines and more, against the coronavirus! I felt then I was fine to stick two fingers up at the TGA and write about these new studies and treatments again!

Sadly, good quality science was hard to find in 2020, due to fraudulent studies, poor quality and biased studies, scaremongering and sensationalist media, and corrupt pharmaceutical companies and governments having a planned agenda - that being of scaring the populations into unprecedented control and tracking, restrictions of movement, closing of businesses and devastating all western economies. All to force a vaccine mandate, allegedly because of "science".

But then the world health agencies, especially the WHO, were guilty of abusing and misusing science, with an extremely dodgy PCR test being used to claim people had COVID when they had no symptoms to falsely keep incidence cases high, and classifying deaths from almost any cause as being from COVID, all to maintain the fear and control over everyone.

In the past 12 months we saw the death of science. And the death of human rights. But also the birth of a new revolution, of people not believing the BS. There's a lot more of us than them, and we can't and we won't let them get away with what they are doing.

2020 became a modern reality show of the George Orwell book "1984", which was supposed to be fiction. If you haven't read the book, do so ASAP, or watch the movie of the same name also released in 1984. You will see what it is "they" are trying to implement using the coronavirus (with a 99+% survival rate) as an excuse.

Despite the censorship agenda by governments or social media platforms of articles, research or opinions they don't want you to see, I will continue my regular investigative articles, along with other health and nutrition articles as usual this year.

I appreciate all your support and the sharing of my posts! I have been getting a few warnings from Facebook on my posts, so I have setup a new account on GAB as "Ross Walter Naturopath" - please find me and follow me there too!
Stay strong, and stay healthy!

References:
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2020). Warning about products claiming to treat or prevent coronavirus. Retrieved 7th February, 2020 from https://www.tga.gov.au/.../warning-about-products...
0 Comments

Scientific protocols in vaccine research and pregnant women - why pregnant women should not get the covid-19 vaccine

8/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
Medical treatments and recommendations are supposed to be based on evidence, hence the term "evidence-based medicine", which forms the foundation of modern medicine as well as in natural medicine.

Government health departments, doctors, and other public health officials supposedly/allegedly/usually base their decisions and health recommendations based on scientific evidence, and hopefully on good quality evidence, which in turn should be based on good scientific protocols and standards.

One of those scientific protocols is to not use pregnant women as test subjects in any scientific or medical study. This is for the obvious potential risk to the unborn baby as well as to the mother. This condition of research came about after World War II as a result of the investigation into the Nazi war crimes and performing dangerous and unethical experiments on people at the time. The resulting Nuremberg Code, of ethical research conditions, included the research subject must be given full informed consent of the experiment, of their willingness to be given voluntarily, all physical and mental suffering should be avoided, the risks should not exceed the importance of the problem being investigated, and other conditions (Lupton & Williams, 2004). The more recent Helsinki Code updates the requirements.

The Nuremberg Code included pregnant women as being protected, or prevented from being used in medical research. Hence there is NO evidence for safety or efficacy of any medications, treatments or vaccines from the manufacturers in pregnant women. Medications and vaccines are approved for public distribution and use without any evidence on pregnant women. This is why when any GP, doctor, public health officer, or politician who says that, for example, flu vaccines or COVID-19 vaccines are safe or effective in pregnant women, they are LYING to you.

Despite this scientific protocol, many studies looking at medications for COVID are actually including pregnant women in about 23-25% of medical trials (Taylor et al., 2020). The authors of this published article are actually recommending, despite decades of scientific protocols, to include pregnant women in more clinical trials. This is a disgrace.

And with vaccine manufacturers being protected by many world governments from any legal liability from lawsuits for any damage or health issues or deaths they cause, the risks of a (very poorly tested) COVID vaccine is far too great a risk for a pregnant woman, or anyone really for that matter.

Currently, the World Health Organisation (WHO) are recommending that, based on a lack of evidence for the above reasons, pregnant women should NOT get one of the COVID-19 vaccines (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021a). But sadly, individual countries are not heeding this advice.

So why do the Centres for Disease Control (CDC) in the US say "getting vaccinated is a personal choice for people who are pregnant"?! (CDC, 2021). When they really should be saying "due to a lack of evidence of safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women, we recommend that women who think they may be pregnant or who are pregnant should not receive this vaccine".

Why are the CDC not informing the population of the risks (ie, NO informed consent), and working for the people, to reduce risks of vaccine damage in pregnant women and their babies?

The CDC is also recommending that women who are trying to get pregnant or who may be pregnant, to NOT test for pregnancy before getting the COVID-19 vaccine!

In the UK, they are being a little more open and saying that the COVID vaccines have not yet been tested in pregnancy, and those who are pregnant should not have this vaccine (Public Health England, 2021). They also say if you get pregnant after the first vaccine, to delay the second vaccine until after the pregnancy. Similar with breastfeeding, as there is again no evidence, they recommend to delay the vaccine until after breastfeeding.

In the European Union, there is less advice than from the above other countries. They simply say that animal studies show no effects in pregnancy. But that doesn't mean anything unless you are a mouse, rat or hamster. They say that the decision to get the COVID vaccine should be a personal one made in conjunction with a healthcare professional. No details of risks or the lack of any studies in pregnancy, or informed consent.

In Australia, the situation is quite dire. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists is calling for pregnant and breastfeeding women to be included in clinical trials, with a view to making the vaccine available to them (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021a)!

The Australian government are also planning to spend $24 million of taxpayer money on a marketing campaign, targeting women in their 30s, as well as migrants and indigenous people, and pregnant women too, to get the COVID vaccine (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021b).

There have already been some reports of spontaneous premature birth immediately after a COVID vaccine, spontaneous miscarriages, and foetal deaths recorded in the US database of vaccine adverse events. This is why pregnant women are not supposed to be tested in clinical trials, and why they should NOT be given these new vaccines.

These "health" organisations and government health departments who are not giving you full informed consent of the risks of the COVID vaccines, or are recommending these vaccines to pregnant women are giving dangerous advice which is unscientific, immoral, unconscionable, and illegal. The individuals and organisations giving this advice will be held accountable in time. Pregnant women are vulnerable physically, mentally and emotionally, and obviously want the best for their health and their baby. They MUST be given the correct advice from authorities who are supposed to protect them, but sadly we cannot trust these authorities anymore, and they must seek expert advice from elsewhere instead. Pregnant women must NOT be used as guinea pigs in a worldwide Nazi-like medical experiment that we are currently experiencing.

Stay healthy!

References:
​
Centres for Disease Control (CDC). (2021). Vaccination Considerations for People who are Pregnant or Breastfeeding. Retrieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.cdc.gov/.../recommendations/pregnancy.html....

European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2021). COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna. Retieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.ema.europa.eu/.../covid-19-vaccine-moderna

Lupton, M.G.F., & Williams, D.J. (2004). The ethics of research on pregnant women: is maternal consent sufficient? BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111, 1307 –1312. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00342.x

Public Health England. (2021). COVID-19 vaccination: a guide for women of childbearing age, pregnant or breastfeeding. Retrieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.gov.uk/.../covid-19-vaccination-a-guide-for....

Sydney Morning Herald. (2021a). Australian government experts mull over COVID vaccine in pregnancy. Retrieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.smh.com.au/.../australian-government-experts...

Sydney Morning Herald. (2021b). COVID-19 vaccine advertising campaign to target 'specific fears'. Retrieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.smh.com.au/.../covid-19-vaccine-advertising...

Taylor, M.M, Kobeissi, L., Kim, C., Amin, A., Thorson, A.E., Bellare, N.B., Brizuela, V., Bonet, M., Kara, E., Thwin, S.S., Kuganantham, H., Ali, M., Oladapo, O.T., & Broutet, N. (2020). Inclusion of pregnant women in COVID-19 treatment trials: a review and global call to action. The Lancet. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30484-8
0 Comments

New UK strain of coronavirus is not as contagious as we are being told

8/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
The recent and allegedly new UK strain of the coronavirus, which caused the lockdown of Brisbane for 3 days when just ONE case was found, is said to be 70% more contagious than before. Except that this was based on a lie... or at least, very poor research.

A colleague of mine located the study which "found" that the new UK strain was allegedly more contagious is not even a published study, and has not even been peer-reviewed (verified and approved) by other scientists. It's not worth the paper it's printed on.

Scientific studies are not all they seem to be in the media. There are many different types of scientific studies of differing quality of evidence. Many studies are very poorly designed, make terrible assumptions or conclusions which don't match their data, or they can be completely made up or fraudulent. It happens. To make things worse, many research studies (or the scientists performing the study) are funded by the very company that sets to profit from a positive outcome, and they design the study for that particular outcome. And then the media often takes an exaggerated and sensationalist story of the study outcomes, because reporters don't know how to read the study in full or how to critically analyse it. And many people still believe what they are told in the media. This is why one week coffee is bad for you, or chocolate, or red meat, or red wine... and the next week comes out with another study showing the opposite! We've all seen this again and again!

You cannot believe the media. You need to read the real source - the study itself. Or get unbiased and independent experts to analyse the studies for you. It seems that Queensland Health and other governments and media have jumped all over the media story that the new UK strain of coronavirus being much more contagious is worthy of scaring everyone, not reading the real study, and then informing clueless politicians take this poor advice and make poorer decisions, based on a lie. Qld Health officials responsible for the recent lockdown should be sacked.

The unpublished study (Davies et al., 2020) which points to the UK strain being so dangerous found:

1. That the new strain was ESTIMATED (yes, their words) to be about 56% more transmissible (NOT 70%!), based on a MATHEMETICAL MODEL, not from real statistics
2. They were unable to find evidence that the new strain results in greater or lesser severity of disease
3. Even if the tiered restrictions in the UK were maintained, these will not bring down the rate of transmission, unless schools and universities are closed
4. The new UK strain has increased incidences despite all the lockdown measures in place (or in other words, the lockdown measures are NOT working)
5. The UK strain has multiple mutations compared to the original strain
6. The study looked at vaccine effectiveness in their modelling, and recommended more vaccinations to attempt to slow the incidence rate. But as I already wrote about recently, the 95% effectiveness of the 2 available COVID vaccines is also a lie, so this modelling cannot be believed
7. Increased transmission of the virus will increase the percentage of herd immunity. The authors then recommend increasing the vaccine coverage to increase herd immunity, but that's a faulty concept, as her immunity ONLY occurs in natural infections not from vaccinations which may only give a temporary immunity before wearing off and you are no longer immune...

Whether a virus is contagious is one thing, but whether it is deadly is another. A mathematical model used in this study cannot factor in all the variables to come up with an accurate outcome that matches reality. They admit that their results are just "estimates", yet they make major recommendations regarding closing down more services, and vaccinating more people (with unproven and experimental vaccines). The recent lockdown in Brisbane, or the tightening restrictions in the UK or other countries isn't working, and isn't justified - a different approach is needed.

Break the incidence and infection cycle - look after your immune system, so that even if you encounter any strain or mutation of this (or any other) virus, your immune system will know what to do to fight it and get rid of it. If you want more information on how to do this, see me!

Stay healthy!

References:
Davies, N.G., Barnard, R.C., Jarvis, C.I., Kucharski, A.J., Munday, J., Pearson, C.A.B., Russell, T.W., Tully, D.C., Abbott, S., Gimma, A., Waites, W., Wong, K.K.M., van Zandvoort, K., Eggo, R.M., Funk, S., Jit, M., Atkins, K.E., & W.J. Edmunds. (2020). Estimated transmissibility and severity of novel SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern 202012/01 in England. medRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.24.20248822
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    COPYRIGHT

    All articles here are Copyright (c) to Ross Walter Nutritionist & Naturopath (2015-2022). You are welcome to share these articles in your personal or business marketing, in full and referencing this website.
    If you wish to have specific health articles written for your business, please ask via email to ross@rosswalter.com.au  

    Archives

    June 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015

    Categories

    All
    5:2 Diet
    Acidity
    Acne
    Acrylamide
    Aged Care Home
    AIDS
    Alcohol
    Alkaline Food
    Allergies
    Aluminium
    Alzheimer's
    Antibacterial
    Antibiotics
    Anti Inflammatories
    Anti-inflammatories
    Anxiety
    Aromatherapy
    Arsenic
    Artificial Sweeteners
    Atherosclerosis
    Autism
    Autoimmune Conditions
    Baby Powder
    Baking Soda
    Banned By Facebook
    Bipolar Disorder
    Blending
    Blood Clots
    Blood Glucose
    Blood Sugar
    Body Autonomy
    Bone Density
    Bowel Movement
    Bowels
    BPA Free Plastic
    BPA-free Plastic
    BPA Plastic
    BPS Plastic
    Burns
    Cacao
    Calcium
    Calories
    Cancer
    Cancer In Children
    Cannabis
    Carb Adapted
    Carbohydrates
    Carcinogens
    Causes
    Celebrity
    Censorship
    Cervical Cancer
    Chemicals
    Children's Health
    Chocolate
    Cholesterol
    Chronic Disease
    Chronic Fatigue
    Chronic Inflammation
    CICO
    Climate Change
    Clinical Trials
    Codeine
    Coeliac Disease
    Coffee
    Cold And Flu Prevention
    Common Cold
    Constipation
    Contraception
    Cooking
    Cookware
    Coronavirus
    Coronavirus Lockdowns
    Coronavirus Research
    Coronavirus Statistics
    Coronavirus Testing
    Coronavirus Tracking
    Coronavirus Vaccines
    Corporate Sponsorship
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    COVID 19 Testing
    COVID-19 Testing
    COVID 19 Vaccine
    COVID-19 Vaccine
    COVID 19 Vax Issues
    COVID-19 Vax Issues
    Cravings
    DAA
    Dairy
    Dental Health
    Depression
    Detox
    Diabetes
    Dieting
    Dietitian
    Dietitians
    Digestive System
    Documentary Review
    Drug Regulators
    EAT Lancet Diet
    EAT-Lancet Diet
    EBV
    Eczema
    Eggs
    E Health
    E-health
    Elderly
    Endocrine Disruptors
    Endometriosis
    Endorsements
    Energy
    Enlarged Prostate
    Environmental Health
    Environmental Toxins
    Epstein-Barr Virus
    Essential Nutrients
    Essential Oils
    Evidence Based
    Exercise
    Farming
    Fast Food
    Fasting
    Fat Adapted
    Fatigue
    Fats
    Female Health
    Female Hormones
    Fermentation
    Fermented Foods
    Fertility
    Fibre
    Fibroids
    Fibromyalgia
    Film Review
    Fish Oil
    Fitness
    Flu
    Fluoride
    Flu Vaccine
    Folate
    Folic Acid
    Food Additives
    Food Allergies
    Food Containters
    Food Guidelines
    Food Industry
    Food Ingredients
    Food Intake
    Food Intolerances
    Food Labelling
    Food Labels
    Food Production
    Food Pyramid
    Food Sensitivities
    Food Star Rating
    Fracking
    Fructose
    Gardasil Vaccine
    Genetically Modified Foods
    Genetic Modification
    Genetics
    Genocide
    Germ Theory
    Glandular Fever
    Global Warming
    Glucose
    Gluten
    Gluten Free Food
    Gluten-free Food
    Glyphosate
    GMO
    Goals
    Government
    Grains
    Gut Bacteria
    Gut-brain Connection
    Gut Health
    Hand Washing
    Health Funds
    Health Information
    Health Insurance
    Health Policy
    Health Star Ratings
    Health Statistics
    Healthy Fats
    Heartburn
    Heart Disease
    Heart Health
    Heavy Metals
    Herd Immunity
    High Blood Pressure
    HIV
    Hormonal Issues
    Hormone Disrupting
    Hormones
    HPV
    HPV Vaccine
    Hydroxychloroquine HCQ
    Hygiene
    IBS
    Immune Suppressives
    Immune System
    Indigestion
    Infections
    Infertility
    Inflammation
    Influenza
    Informed Consent
    Insomnia
    Insulin
    Irritable Bowel
    Juicing
    Ketogenic Diet
    LCHF
    Leaky Gut
    Liver
    Low Carb Diet
    Low Fat Diets
    Low GI
    Lung Disease
    Macronutrients
    Man Flu
    Manuka Honey
    Margarine
    Marketing
    Masks
    Meal Replacements
    Measles
    Meat
    Medical Corruption
    Medical Privacy
    Medical Records
    Medical Science
    Medical Testing
    Medications
    Medicinal Cannabis
    Melanoma
    Melatonin
    Men's Health
    Mental Health
    Mental Illness
    Microbiome
    Microwave Meals
    Microwaves
    Miscarriage
    MMR Vaccine
    Moderation
    Modern Diets
    Modern Medicine
    Monkeypox
    Motivation
    MRNA Vaccines
    MTHFR
    My Health Record
    Natural Therapies
    Naturopathy
    New Years Resolutions
    NSAIDs
    Nursing Home
    Nutrient Deficiencies
    Nutrients
    Nutrigenomics
    Nutrition
    Nutritional Medicine
    Nutrition Guidelines
    Nutritionist
    Nutrition Research
    Obesity
    Oestrogen
    Oil
    Omega-3
    One World Diet
    Osteoporosis
    Pain
    Painkillers
    Paleo
    Pandemic
    Pap Smears
    Pathology Testing
    PCOS
    PCR Testing
    Personalised Consultations
    Pet Foods
    Pets
    Pharmaceuticals
    PH Of Food
    Plant Based Diets
    Plant-based Diets
    Plastic
    Plastic Bottles
    PMDD
    PMS
    Polyunsaturated Fats
    Poo
    Population Growth
    POTS
    PPI
    Preconception
    Pregnancy
    Primal
    Privacy
    Probiotics
    Processed Foods
    Psoriasis
    Pyrrole Disorder
    Red Meat
    Red Wine
    Reflux
    Research
    Respiratory Infections
    Resveratrol
    Reviews
    Rice
    Root Cause Analysis
    Root Causes
    Roundup
    Salt
    SARS
    Saturated Fat
    Schizophrenia
    Scientific Evidence
    Scientific Research
    SIBO
    Skin
    Skin Cancer
    Skin Conditions
    Sleep
    Smallpox
    Sore Throat
    Soy
    Soy Products
    Sports
    Sports Nutrition
    Spring
    Statistics
    Stevia
    Stomach Function
    Stress
    Sugar
    Sunburn
    Sunglasses
    Sunlight
    Sun Safe
    Sunscreens
    Talcum Powder
    TGA
    The Medical Model
    Thyroid
    Tonsillitis
    Tooth Decay
    Toxicity
    Toxins And Chemicals
    Treat The Causes
    Treat The Whole Body
    Type 1 Diabetes
    Type 2 Diabetes
    Ulcers
    Vaccination
    Vaccine Adverse Events
    Vaccine Passports
    Vaccine Research
    Vaccines
    Vaccine Testing
    Vegan
    Vegetables
    Viral Infections
    Virus
    Vitamin C
    Vitamin D
    Water
    Water Fluoridation
    Weight Gain
    Weight Loss
    Wheat
    Whole Grains
    Winter
    Winter Health
    Womens Health
    Would Healing
    Xenoestrogens
    Xeno-oestrogens
    Zinc

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly