Ross Walter Nutritionist and Naturopath health articles and blog - Ross Walter Nutritionist & Naturopath

COVID-19 vaccinations started in Australia

27/2/2021

So the COVID vaccinations started here in Australia this week...

I have tried over the past 12 months to show you that there are many factors which can lead to an increased risk of this infection, and what you can do about preventing and treating it. The main risk factor is a low functioning immune system, which is the result of many possible factors too. I've been saying all along - improve your immune system function to prevent the coronavirus infection and also reduce any risks of complications and to reduce severity.

If you aren't at least a little bit suspicious of the goings-on over the past 12 months, then there's not a lot more that I can do to help you! Let's just review some important questions and answers about the new COVID vaccines:

Will getting the COVID shot be safe? NO! (thousands have died from the vaccine, especially in the elderly and other age groups that have no mortality from the virus itself)
Will getting the COVID shot get rid of the virus? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot reduce COVID incidence rates? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot improve the herd immunity rate? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot improve your immune system? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot stop you from getting the coronavirus infection? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot stop you from passing it onto others? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot stop you from dying? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot remove the need to wear a mask? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot remove the need to social distance? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot remove the need for lockdowns? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot get rid of the need to use QR codes to check in everywhere? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot reduce business closures (or enable businesses to open again)? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot get rid of the travel bans? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot improve the survival rate from COVID of 99.9%? NO!

If you are still keen on the vaccine after reading this (and my many other articles) then all I can say is "Good luck!". Ideally you should undertake a preparation period before this (or any) vaccine of at least 2 weeks to improve immune system function and detox pathways, and continue a post-vax protocol for about 4 weeks afterwards, to reduce any risks of complications.

So why are we being told to put all our faith in these new and experimental vaccines, if nothing else will change? Because the pandemic is not about a virus, (which has a 99.9% survival rate of the very few who actually get it) but an excuse to implement social changes and total control and monitoring.

Why would you want to get this experimental (ie "untested to normal scientific standards") vacine when NOTHING will change after getting it? (Yes I really want to know!)

Stay healthy!

This is not a real pandemic (Part 2)

27/2/2021

I wrote my list of "This isn't a real pandemic" observations of events some months ago, which can be found here: http://www.rosswalter.com.au/articles/this-is-not-a-real-pandemic. A lot has changed since then but some things are still the same, that this still isn't a real pandemic. Because:

A real pandemic doesn't need social media platforms to censor posts that are repeating official news sources, or published research studies or statistical analyses that question the official narrative (ABC News, 2021)
A real pandemic doesn't require Police to visit the homes of people who question the official narrative on social media to silence them
A real pandemic doesn't need to give lessons in schools to brainwash children into not believing any anti-government information such as anti-vax beliefs (Ilford Recorder News, 2021)
A real pandemic doesn't need a marketing plan and advertising blitzes (also known as propaganda) to encourage people to get the vaccine, such as Australia's $24 million media campaign (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021a)
A real pandemic doesn't need to give medical clinics and doctors financial incentives to encourage their patients (with coercion, which is illegal) to get vaccinated, with Australia's doctors set to make up to $49.50 per person (plus $10 per person to the medical clinic) for a total of $ 1,528,006,886 (over $1.5 BILLION) to vaccinate every Australian (Australian Government, 2021)
A real pandemic doesn't need to offer financial incentives to encourage the general public (aka, "bribes") to get the vaccine
A real pandemic doesn't need to pay celebrities to appeal to people in marketing campaigns to get the vaccine
A real pandemic doesn't have nurses, doctors, celebrities or politicians needing to fake getting the vaccine live on TV, to encourage people to think it's safe and to get it too (yes we saw the needle was empty, or the plunger not pushed in, or the needle cap was on...)
A real pandemic doesn't cover up the death of a nurse who got the vaccine live on TV then collapsed shortly afterwards when interviewed, because you weren't supposed to see that happen and they still want you to get the vaccine
A real pandemic doesn't need to call sudden lockdowns and restrictions based on ONE random case after weeks or months without any cases or deaths
A real pandemic doesn't need to mandate wearing of masks suddenly across a state or nation, again when one case is identified after weeks or longer without incidences, especially when wearing of masks was actively discouraged at the height of incidences and deaths in the early months of the pandemic
A real pandemic doesn't need restrictions being placed on everyone, to protect the 0.1% who are at risk - being elderly people with more than one health chronic health condition
A real pandemic doesn't allow tens of thousands of people to congregate at large scheduled sporting matches (football, cricket, tennis etc) but not allow more than a few people at your home or in a shop at the same time
A real pandemic doesn't need you to scan a QR code and enter your real or fake contact details so your movements can be traced, in order to enter shops, buy food, or use services
A real pandemic doesn't require a "vaccine passport" to prove you had the vaccine, in order to travel, attend school, attend work, use government services, eat at a cafe or get money from your own account at a bank...
A real pandemic doesn't need governments to indemnify pharmaceutical companies from legal liability and lawsuits, from adverse reactions or deaths that the vaccines are known to cause (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021b)
A real pandemic doesn't need insurance companies to indemnify doctors and other health professionals from legal liability and lawsuits from adverse reactions or deaths that the vaccines can cause
A real pandemic doesn't need deliberate fear-mongering by politicians or the media, for a virus with more than a 99% survival rate (remember the early videos in China of people just collapsing in the street and dying?! That only happened there, as the start of the fear campaign)
A real pandemic would have governments and health officials telling people the truth and giving more practical advice to prevent and treat the infection by improve the immune systems of everyone, which can be done naturally, easily, and cheaply. Improving the strength and function of your immune system is the major factor which will protect you from this virus..

Hence this still isn't a real pandemic. It is a PLANdemic.
Be informed. Be empowered. Question everything. And stay healthy!

References:
ABC News. (2021). Facebook to take down all false vaccine claims, not just those related to coronavirus. Retrieved 12th February 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-09/facebook-to-take-down-false-vaccine-claims/13134828

Australian Government. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Retrieved 12th February 2021 from https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/01/covid-19-vaccine-rollout-expression-of-interest-for-primary-care-participation-in-phase-1b_1.pdf

Ilford Recorder News. (2021). Lessons in schools to counter the anti-vaxxers. Retrieved 12th February 2021 from https://www.ilfordrecorder.co.uk/news/education/school-lesson-designed-to-explain-vaccine-7320540

Sydney Morning Herald. (2021a). COVID-19 vaccine advertising campaign to target specific fears. Retrieved 12th February from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/covid-19-vaccine-advertising-campaign-to-target-specific-fears-20210109-p56svi.html

Sydney Morning Herald. (2021a). Vaccine suppliers given indemnity for 'inevitable' side effects. Retrieved 12th February from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/morrison-government-grants-indemnity-for-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-20201008-p5636o.html

Coronavirus pandemic update on COVID-19 vaccines - Wk1 FEb 2021

8/2/2021

Here's a summary on the COVID-19 vaccine situation around the world...

The pharmaceutical giant Merck has abandoned its two COVID-19 vaccine trials, after studies showed very little effectiveness of their vaccine (Merck, 2021). The manufacturer, in their news release, said that the vaccines produced LESS immune responses than compared to a NATURAL infection, and less than other COVID-19 vaccines, leading to their decision to scrap their trials and vaccine production.

The Oxford University/Astra Zeneca vaccine is undergoing human trials in the UK. While most of the other COVID vaccine manufacturers saved a lot of time in vaccine development by skipping the typically-required animal testing, the Oxford vaccine has been doing animal trials anyway.

The Oxford vaccine animal trials found that ALL of the monkeys became infected with COVID-19 when challenged after the vaccination. There was no difference in the viral load or symptoms between the vaccinated group and the un-vaccinated group. The antibody levels produced from the vaccine was very low, hence the vaccine did not prevent animals catching the virus. The vaccine did NOT work (van Doremalen et al., 2020). More of a concern was that the study, by the Oxford scientists themselves, was that "viral shedding" of the coronavirus was NOT reduced in the vaccinated animals. This is proof that the Oxford vaccine actually "sheds" in mucus which can then infect other people to spread the genetically-modified virus - from the vaccine.

The scientists performing the animal trial suggested that if similar results were found in human trials, "the vaccine would be unlikely to reduce transmission in the wider community".

Animal trials often show problems with vaccines (or medications) well before they get to human trials. Many vaccines and medications never make it to human trial stage, because of poor efficacy or from causing too many problems (ie, side effects) in animals.

The lack of animal trials is a massive safety issue when very new vaccines or medications are being developed. Animal trials are also contentious and perceived as unethical or cruel, but then again so is trialling such new vaccines or medications in humans.

The Oxford/AZ vaccine was meant to be one of the major vaccines being offered, so much so that the Australian government bought a huge number of doses... well before trials had finished (ABC, 2020a).

Switzerland, however, has now banned (or "not authorised") the Oxford/AZ COVID vaccine because of a lack of evidence of effectiveness (Express, 2021). This was confirmed with the German vaccine committee research team finding that it is only 8% effective in those over 65 years of age, and therefore the Oxford/AZ vaccine will not be recommended to adults over 65 years in Germany (Tio, 2021; ABC, 2021b).

Pfizer has been having issues with their vaccine too... Pfizer applied for "emergency use authorisation" for its mRNA vaccine to be given in India, after the country's medicines regulator requested further information and a local trial to confirm the vaccine's safety and efficacy. Pfizer declined to undertake these further investigations into their vaccine and withdrew their application (CNBC, 2021).

The Centres of Disease Control (CDC) in the US on their own website report a published study that Israel had a surge in coronavirus incidences at the same time as the Pfizer vaccine was approved and being given to people. Many people working in healthcare in Israel developed COVID-19 from 1-10 days after vaccination. At the start of the Pfizer vaccine rollout, Israel have a COVID-19 positive test rate of 4.4% of the population (Times of Israel, 2020), but this nearly doubled to 7% of the population just over 1 month later as more people got the Pfizer vaccine (CDC, 2021; World of Meters, 2021). Clearly the Pfizer vaccine is NOT working! The Israeli study found that the Pfizer vaccine efficacy is only 52%, not their reported 95%! Hence they say that even immunised persons can still develop COVID-19.

Ironically, China are also developing their own vaccine. The Chinese COVID vaccine from CanSino Biologics showed 81% adverse events in their clinical trials, with 17% of them being classified as "serious" adverse reactions. This is a different type of vaccine, similar to the AZ/Oxford type and using a genetically-modified adenovirus type 5 virus (Corvelva, 2021). The very high amount of adverse events is very concerning.

That concludes the roundup of the world's COVID vaccine news. With not a lot being positive news (unless you count the various countries stopping some of the vaccines being used on their populations). There's no evidence yet of any slowing of COVID incidences or deaths from any country, despite many millions of vaccines being given. Will wait and see for more studies or statistics to come out... In the meantime, support your immune system!

Stay healthy!

References:

Amit, S., Beni, S.A., Biber, A., Grinberg, A., Leshem, E., & Regev-Yochay, G. (2021). Post-Vaccination COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers, Israel.

Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2020a). Australia orders 84 million doses of coronavirus vaccine for massive free roll-out next year. Retrieved 7th February 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-06/free-coronavirus-vaccine-to-be-made-available-throughout-20212/12635174

Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2020b). Germany questions efficacy of AstraZeneca vaccine in the elderly. Retrieved 7th February 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-29/germany-questions-efficacy-of-astrazeneca-vaccine-in-the-elderly/13101658

CNBC. (2021). Pfizer withdraws application for emergency use of its Covid-19 vaccine in India. Retrieved 7th February from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/05/pfizer-withdraws-application-for-emergency-use-of-its-covid-19-vaccine-in-india.html

Corvelva. (2021). Covid-19 vaccine: 81% of the clinical trial volunteers had reactions to the vaccine. Retrieved 7th February 2020 from https://www.corvelva.it/en/approfondimenti/notizie/covid19/vaccino-covid-19-l-81-dei-volontari-della-sperimentazione-clinica-ha-avuto-reazioni-al-vaccino.html

Express. (2021). Switzerland bans AstraZeneca vaccine for ALL citizens as Europe declares war on UK jab. Retrieved 5th February 2021 from https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1392962/eu-vaccine-latest-astrazeneca-switzerland-ban-oxford-vaccine-uk-latest

Merck. (2021). Merck Discontinues Development of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates; Continues Development of Two Investigational Therapeutic Candidates. Retrieved 3rd February 2021 from https://www.merck.com/news/merck-discontinues-development-of-sars-cov-2-covid-19-vaccine-candidates-continues-development-of-two-investigational-therapeutic-candidates/

Times of Israel. (2020). Daily virus cases surpassed 3,000 on Sunday, with 4.4% of tests positive. Retrieved 7th February 2020 from https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog-december-21-2020/

Tio. (2021). Dubbi sul vaccino di AstraZeneca: «Efficacia solo dell'8% sugli over 65». Retrieved 7th February from https://www.tio.ch/dal-mondo/attualita/1488779/vaccino-astrazeneca-dubbi-over-efficacia

van Doremalen, M., Lambe, T., Spencer, A., Belij-Rammerstorfer, S., Purushotham, J.N. Port, J.R., Avanzato, V., Bushmaker, T., Flaxman, A., Ulaszewska, M., Feldmann, F., Allen, E.R., Sharpe, H., Schulz, J., Holbrook, M., Okumura, A., Meade-White, K., Pérez-Pérez, L., Bissett, C., Gilbride, C., Williamson, B.N., Rosenke, R., Long, D., Ishwarbhai, A., Kailath, R., Rose, L., Morris, S., Powers, C., Lovaglio, J., Hanley, P.W., Scott, D., Saturday, G., de Wit, E., Gilbert, S.C., Munster, V.J. (2020). ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques, bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.13.093195

World of Meters. (2020) Coronavirus cases. Retrieved 6th February 2021 from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Body autonomy rights - your body your decision your health

8/2/2021

Body autonomy is the right of every person to make their own decisions about their body without external influence or coercion.

Body Autonomy particularly relates to health and medical decisions, and is incredibly relevant today in this alleged mandatory vaccine environment.

The constitutions of many countries or laws of many states or countries support body autonomy, and especially so in Australia where our constitution specifically makes it illegal for any medical treatment to be mandated, forced or even coerced without voluntary choice based on full informed consent of the risks vs benefits.

Some politicians have stated that COVID vaccinations will be mandatory, and others have said that restrictions will be placed on those who choose not to take the vaccine. Such restrictions have said to include the ability to travel, work in government services, access government services and benefits, attending government buildings, being able to work in private companies, get healthcare, attend movies or even eat in restaurants or drink in bars.

I warned about "digital COVID passports" being developed in early 2020, and now many companies are jumping on board to develop this technology, to track and monitor everyone, everywhere. This coronavirus plandemic is just the excuse to bring in these new laws that ignore and trample all over your rights.

You cannot let politicians make illegal decisions like this that ignore the constitutions and laws of countries. You must stand up against this tyranny.

It's your body, your decision, your rights, and your health. And someone else's body is their decision too.

Far more people die from starvation than the coronavirus

8/2/2021

Over 4 million people in 2020 died from hunger (twice as many as COVID-19, but nothing being done about this), with around 9 million dying every year from a lack of food (Global Nutrition Report, 2015). There’s a vaxxine for starvation. It’s called food.

Ironically, improved nutrition is also the vaxxine against COVID-19, helping the immune system work better against this infection, as it does for any new infection that the body hasn't seen before.

The trillions of dollars spent on COVID-1984 could feed all humans for hundreds of years. Yet, millions of people are being thrown into abject poverty, hunger, malnutrition and destitution because of this pandemic BS. All to develop an unnecessary vaxxine which is injuring and killing more people than the virus truly is.

COVID-19 is a respiratory condition with a mortality rate of 0.01% - 0.03% of those who actually get sick from it. And only 0.3% of the total population who get tested are deemed as "positive", and many don't get any symptoms due to a high false positive rate. Hence the actual true mortality rate is very, very low. In Australia it is just 0.0003% of the population (World of Meters, 2021). Even that result is based on dodgy PCR testing and ridiculous death classifications.

What a pathetic joke.

Wake Up.

Wearing a mask doesn't work to prevent the coronavirus, so lets try wearing 2 or even 3 masks

8/2/2021

I have published some articles showing how ineffective masks are at either stopping transmission of any respiratory infection (including the coronavirus) or preventing you from getting it (or any other respiratory infection). Those articles were fully referenced from published studies, even showing the poor effectiveness of different masks for the coronavirus specifically.

In a pathetic attempt to make masking work, some alleged health officials are talking about "double-masking" or wearing of 2 masks, one on top of another to try and make it more difficult for a tiny virus to pass through 2 flimsy pieces of fabric instead of just one!

Then some other idiot health officials suggested "why not 3?"! As usual, the brainless media have already started promoting this idea as a great new step we must take to be free of the virus! (see attached photos). Why not then wear 10 masks?!

Where is the evidence of 75% or 90% effectiveness of wearing multiple masks? I would claim otherwise that multi-masking is 75-90% effective in reducing the ability to actually breathe... but who needs oxygen anyway?

Many people have found it difficult to wear even one mask, for many health reasons, and should not be required to wear one because they do make breathing more difficult. Also that the masks become lovely breeding grounds for opportunistic bacteria and fungi/moulds very quickly from the warmth and moist breath within minutes... which can increase the risk of more respiratory infections.

If double and triple-masking is recommended, would people need 2 or 3 medical exemptions, one for each mask?!

In another crazy recommendation seen recently, a swimming pool is recommending that people must wear a mask IN THE POOL! Can you imagine the difficulty with breathing if you are swimming laps with a WET mask stuck to your mouth and nose? I hope the pool has good insurance because people are likely to die from this stupid and dangerous advice.

Like these photos, this coronavirus circus is a joke.

Or you could just not wear a mask and support your immune system better to fight this and any other winter respiratory infection, which happens in the colder months for most people every year...

Stay healthy!

The coronavirus is a killer, of human rights

8/2/2021

COVID-19 is a killer.

Mainly of older people with existing chronic health conditions, sadly.

But COVID-19 is also a killer of:

- the common cold and flu
- heart disease
- cancer.

Due to incidences from these conditions being classified as "COVID-19" or deaths from these being classified as a "COVID death".

COVID-19 is also a killer of:
- common sense
- thinking
- logic
- science. Science died in 2020. RIP.

In the wider community, COVID-19 has killed:

- the working class
- millions of businesses and jobs
- many world economies.

Between people, COVID-19 has killed:

- human connections
- socialisation
- relationships and friendships
- compassion
- free speech
- autonomy
- trust in the media, governments and medicine
- human rights
- hope
- love.

But these can be turned around! Look after yourself, your health and your family. Stand up for yourself, and do what is or feels right for YOU.
We can get our lives and world back again, and it will be better than before!

The coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic 12 months on

8/2/2021

One year ago (on 22-2-2020), I first started posting about the coronavirus! Wow, hasn't that 12 months gone fast?! And haven't things changed? But not for the better I believe.

I started writing my coronavirus-related articles to help people to prevent getting this new infection by improving their immune systems and to enable it to do what it is supposed to do - fight infections!

Only for our drugs regulator (the TGA) to warn all health practitioners in Australia to NOT give any health advice or recommendations to prevent the new virus! They said that there was no evidence of any treatment, product or recommendation being effective, so we couldn't tell you about them. Never mind that the same natural treatments have been shown to be effective against all other viral infections in the past! I changed the wording of my articles to focus more on your immune system but being careful (or ambiguous!) to still give advice.

Luckily more and more evidence was published from studies showing the benefits of vitamin C, vitamin D, zinc, many herbal medicines and more, against the coronavirus! I felt then I was fine to stick two fingers up at the TGA and write about these new studies and treatments again!

Sadly, good quality science was hard to find in 2020, due to fraudulent studies, poor quality and biased studies, scaremongering and sensationalist media, and corrupt pharmaceutical companies and governments having a planned agenda - that being of scaring the populations into unprecedented control and tracking, restrictions of movement, closing of businesses and devastating all western economies. All to force a vaccine mandate, allegedly because of "science".

But then the world health agencies, especially the WHO, were guilty of abusing and misusing science, with an extremely dodgy PCR test being used to claim people had COVID when they had no symptoms to falsely keep incidence cases high, and classifying deaths from almost any cause as being from COVID, all to maintain the fear and control over everyone.

In the past 12 months we saw the death of science. And the death of human rights. But also the birth of a new revolution, of people not believing the BS. There's a lot more of us than them, and we can't and we won't let them get away with what they are doing.

2020 became a modern reality show of the George Orwell book "1984", which was supposed to be fiction. If you haven't read the book, do so ASAP, or watch the movie of the same name also released in 1984. You will see what it is "they" are trying to implement using the coronavirus (with a 99+% survival rate) as an excuse.

Despite the censorship agenda by governments or social media platforms of articles, research or opinions they don't want you to see, I will continue my regular investigative articles, along with other health and nutrition articles as usual this year.

I appreciate all your support and the sharing of my posts! I have been getting a few warnings from Facebook on my posts, so I have setup a new account on GAB as "Ross Walter Naturopath" - please find me and follow me there too!
Stay strong, and stay healthy!

References:
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2020). Warning about products claiming to treat or prevent coronavirus. Retrieved 7th February, 2020 from https://www.tga.gov.au/.../warning-about-products...

Scientific protocols in vaccine research and pregnant women - why pregnant women should not get the covid-19 vaccine

8/2/2021

Medical treatments and recommendations are supposed to be based on evidence, hence the term "evidence-based medicine", which forms the foundation of modern medicine as well as in natural medicine.

Government health departments, doctors, and other public health officials supposedly/allegedly/usually base their decisions and health recommendations based on scientific evidence, and hopefully on good quality evidence, which in turn should be based on good scientific protocols and standards.

One of those scientific protocols is to not use pregnant women as test subjects in any scientific or medical study. This is for the obvious potential risk to the unborn baby as well as to the mother. This condition of research came about after World War II as a result of the investigation into the Nazi war crimes and performing dangerous and unethical experiments on people at the time. The resulting Nuremberg Code, of ethical research conditions, included the research subject must be given full informed consent of the experiment, of their willingness to be given voluntarily, all physical and mental suffering should be avoided, the risks should not exceed the importance of the problem being investigated, and other conditions (Lupton & Williams, 2004). The more recent Helsinki Code updates the requirements.

The Nuremberg Code included pregnant women as being protected, or prevented from being used in medical research. Hence there is NO evidence for safety or efficacy of any medications, treatments or vaccines from the manufacturers in pregnant women. Medications and vaccines are approved for public distribution and use without any evidence on pregnant women. This is why when any GP, doctor, public health officer, or politician who says that, for example, flu vaccines or COVID-19 vaccines are safe or effective in pregnant women, they are LYING to you.

Despite this scientific protocol, many studies looking at medications for COVID are actually including pregnant women in about 23-25% of medical trials (Taylor et al., 2020). The authors of this published article are actually recommending, despite decades of scientific protocols, to include pregnant women in more clinical trials. This is a disgrace.

And with vaccine manufacturers being protected by many world governments from any legal liability from lawsuits for any damage or health issues or deaths they cause, the risks of a (very poorly tested) COVID vaccine is far too great a risk for a pregnant woman, or anyone really for that matter.

Currently, the World Health Organisation (WHO) are recommending that, based on a lack of evidence for the above reasons, pregnant women should NOT get one of the COVID-19 vaccines (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021a). But sadly, individual countries are not heeding this advice.

So why do the Centres for Disease Control (CDC) in the US say "getting vaccinated is a personal choice for people who are pregnant"?! (CDC, 2021). When they really should be saying "due to a lack of evidence of safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women, we recommend that women who think they may be pregnant or who are pregnant should not receive this vaccine".

Why are the CDC not informing the population of the risks (ie, NO informed consent), and working for the people, to reduce risks of vaccine damage in pregnant women and their babies?

The CDC is also recommending that women who are trying to get pregnant or who may be pregnant, to NOT test for pregnancy before getting the COVID-19 vaccine!

In the UK, they are being a little more open and saying that the COVID vaccines have not yet been tested in pregnancy, and those who are pregnant should not have this vaccine (Public Health England, 2021). They also say if you get pregnant after the first vaccine, to delay the second vaccine until after the pregnancy. Similar with breastfeeding, as there is again no evidence, they recommend to delay the vaccine until after breastfeeding.

In the European Union, there is less advice than from the above other countries. They simply say that animal studies show no effects in pregnancy. But that doesn't mean anything unless you are a mouse, rat or hamster. They say that the decision to get the COVID vaccine should be a personal one made in conjunction with a healthcare professional. No details of risks or the lack of any studies in pregnancy, or informed consent.

In Australia, the situation is quite dire. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists is calling for pregnant and breastfeeding women to be included in clinical trials, with a view to making the vaccine available to them (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021a)!

The Australian government are also planning to spend $24 million of taxpayer money on a marketing campaign, targeting women in their 30s, as well as migrants and indigenous people, and pregnant women too, to get the COVID vaccine (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021b).

There have already been some reports of spontaneous premature birth immediately after a COVID vaccine, spontaneous miscarriages, and foetal deaths recorded in the US database of vaccine adverse events. This is why pregnant women are not supposed to be tested in clinical trials, and why they should NOT be given these new vaccines.

These "health" organisations and government health departments who are not giving you full informed consent of the risks of the COVID vaccines, or are recommending these vaccines to pregnant women are giving dangerous advice which is unscientific, immoral, unconscionable, and illegal. The individuals and organisations giving this advice will be held accountable in time. Pregnant women are vulnerable physically, mentally and emotionally, and obviously want the best for their health and their baby. They MUST be given the correct advice from authorities who are supposed to protect them, but sadly we cannot trust these authorities anymore, and they must seek expert advice from elsewhere instead. Pregnant women must NOT be used as guinea pigs in a worldwide Nazi-like medical experiment that we are currently experiencing.

Stay healthy!

References:

Centres for Disease Control (CDC). (2021). Vaccination Considerations for People who are Pregnant or Breastfeeding. Retrieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.cdc.gov/.../recommendations/pregnancy.html....

European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2021). COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna. Retieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.ema.europa.eu/.../covid-19-vaccine-moderna

Lupton, M.G.F., & Williams, D.J. (2004). The ethics of research on pregnant women: is maternal consent sufficient? BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111, 1307 –1312. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00342.x

Public Health England. (2021). COVID-19 vaccination: a guide for women of childbearing age, pregnant or breastfeeding. Retrieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.gov.uk/.../covid-19-vaccination-a-guide-for....

Sydney Morning Herald. (2021a). Australian government experts mull over COVID vaccine in pregnancy. Retrieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.smh.com.au/.../australian-government-experts...

Sydney Morning Herald. (2021b). COVID-19 vaccine advertising campaign to target 'specific fears'. Retrieved 17th January 2021 from https://www.smh.com.au/.../covid-19-vaccine-advertising...

Taylor, M.M, Kobeissi, L., Kim, C., Amin, A., Thorson, A.E., Bellare, N.B., Brizuela, V., Bonet, M., Kara, E., Thwin, S.S., Kuganantham, H., Ali, M., Oladapo, O.T., & Broutet, N. (2020). Inclusion of pregnant women in COVID-19 treatment trials: a review and global call to action. The Lancet. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30484-8

New UK strain of coronavirus is not as contagious as we are being told

8/2/2021

The recent and allegedly new UK strain of the coronavirus, which caused the lockdown of Brisbane for 3 days when just ONE case was found, is said to be 70% more contagious than before. Except that this was based on a lie... or at least, very poor research.

A colleague of mine located the study which "found" that the new UK strain was allegedly more contagious is not even a published study, and has not even been peer-reviewed (verified and approved) by other scientists. It's not worth the paper it's printed on.

Scientific studies are not all they seem to be in the media. There are many different types of scientific studies of differing quality of evidence. Many studies are very poorly designed, make terrible assumptions or conclusions which don't match their data, or they can be completely made up or fraudulent. It happens. To make things worse, many research studies (or the scientists performing the study) are funded by the very company that sets to profit from a positive outcome, and they design the study for that particular outcome. And then the media often takes an exaggerated and sensationalist story of the study outcomes, because reporters don't know how to read the study in full or how to critically analyse it. And many people still believe what they are told in the media. This is why one week coffee is bad for you, or chocolate, or red meat, or red wine... and the next week comes out with another study showing the opposite! We've all seen this again and again!

You cannot believe the media. You need to read the real source - the study itself. Or get unbiased and independent experts to analyse the studies for you. It seems that Queensland Health and other governments and media have jumped all over the media story that the new UK strain of coronavirus being much more contagious is worthy of scaring everyone, not reading the real study, and then informing clueless politicians take this poor advice and make poorer decisions, based on a lie. Qld Health officials responsible for the recent lockdown should be sacked.

The unpublished study (Davies et al., 2020) which points to the UK strain being so dangerous found:

1. That the new strain was ESTIMATED (yes, their words) to be about 56% more transmissible (NOT 70%!), based on a MATHEMETICAL MODEL, not from real statistics
2. They were unable to find evidence that the new strain results in greater or lesser severity of disease
3. Even if the tiered restrictions in the UK were maintained, these will not bring down the rate of transmission, unless schools and universities are closed
4. The new UK strain has increased incidences despite all the lockdown measures in place (or in other words, the lockdown measures are NOT working)
5. The UK strain has multiple mutations compared to the original strain
6. The study looked at vaccine effectiveness in their modelling, and recommended more vaccinations to attempt to slow the incidence rate. But as I already wrote about recently, the 95% effectiveness of the 2 available COVID vaccines is also a lie, so this modelling cannot be believed
7. Increased transmission of the virus will increase the percentage of herd immunity. The authors then recommend increasing the vaccine coverage to increase herd immunity, but that's a faulty concept, as her immunity ONLY occurs in natural infections not from vaccinations which may only give a temporary immunity before wearing off and you are no longer immune...

Whether a virus is contagious is one thing, but whether it is deadly is another. A mathematical model used in this study cannot factor in all the variables to come up with an accurate outcome that matches reality. They admit that their results are just "estimates", yet they make major recommendations regarding closing down more services, and vaccinating more people (with unproven and experimental vaccines). The recent lockdown in Brisbane, or the tightening restrictions in the UK or other countries isn't working, and isn't justified - a different approach is needed.

Break the incidence and infection cycle - look after your immune system, so that even if you encounter any strain or mutation of this (or any other) virus, your immune system will know what to do to fight it and get rid of it. If you want more information on how to do this, see me!

Stay healthy!

References:
Davies, N.G., Barnard, R.C., Jarvis, C.I., Kucharski, A.J., Munday, J., Pearson, C.A.B., Russell, T.W., Tully, D.C., Abbott, S., Gimma, A., Waites, W., Wong, K.K.M., van Zandvoort, K., Eggo, R.M., Funk, S., Jit, M., Atkins, K.E., & W.J. Edmunds. (2020). Estimated transmissibility and severity of novel SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern 202012/01 in England. medRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.24.20248822

LoCKDOWN IN BRISBANE and MANDATORY MASKS REQUIRED

8/2/2021

So we have a 3-day COVID lockdown in Brisbane again, as a result of ONE case, but stricter restrictions than before with mandatory wearing of masks when you leave your home.

Masks are even required when driving your car, alone! There have been car accidents in other countries when mandatory masks were introduced, from people suffering hypoxia (low oxygen) causing poor judgment (from low oxygen to the brain) and blacking out.

Masks are even required when exercising, which is even more stupid, as you need to exhale and inhale faster to get more oxygen, and masks make that more difficult. Again people have collapsed and even died while exercising while wearing masks.

If children are not required to wear a mask, you have to ask why - because they NEED more oxygen, and masks can reduce that. If masks reduce oxygen and can affect children, then surely by the same logic, masks also reduce oxygen in adults?! Maybe not as much in healthy adults, but adults with chronic health issues, lung conditions, heart conditions, mental health conditions, or other reasons, will be more affected by having to wear a mask.

Luckily you can claim a medical exemption for not wearing a mask, if you are stopped and questioned by police. Just say you have a medical exemption. Government websites confirm that you do not need to have or provide proof of this. Police are not doctors and cannot ask you what your medical reason is - that is private information between you and your doctor.

One of the attached pics to the article was taken from the Qld Health website in March 2020, when they were saying that there was "no evidence" of masks being effective outside of a hospital environment to prevent a COVID infection or reduce transmission. They recommended to NOT wear a mask!

Another of the attached pics is a screenshot of another government website, showing that there is very little evidence for wearing of masks to reduce respiratory infections such as COVID! The website can only refer to a HAMSTER study showing a reduced incidence of COVID in hamsters separated by a surgical mask material! But COVID doesn't affect hamsters...

Another much better quality and HUMAN study, the "Danish mask study" conducted in over 3000 people, found that wearing surgical masks specifically for protection against COVID and for reducing transmission to others, that there was no statistical significance of any benefit in wearing such masks. The study also concluded that wearing of surgical masks in addition to other public health measures DID NOT reduce the incidence rate of COVID infections (Bundgaard et al, 2020).

I have written articles in 2020 with full references showing that many published studies of using masks for preventing respiratory infections including COVID, simply do not work. This is because:

1) People wear them incorrectly
2) People wear them for too long, and they become moist, which becomes a breeding ground for bacteria, causing more respiratory and/or skin infections
3) People keep touching the mask to adjust them, and "infecting" the mask
4) People use the wrong types of mask, or made from useless materials that won't prevent anything, such as from fabric, paper, old socks... etc
I won't repeat the details of the previous article and research on masks, but you can read that here - http://www.rosswalter.com.au/.../do-masks-protect-you-or...
I'm also appalled again (and have been since Feb 2020) that the government "health" departments are still not telling you how you can better reduce your risks of the coronavirus other than washing your hands and wearing a mask... There is a LOT more you can do! And I've continually been saying this and giving advice since Feb 2020!
At least the NHS (National Health Service, the national government health department) in the UK which has a service of offering free vitamin D supplements to those who are at high risk of coronavirus! (NHS, 2021). Testing for and/or making sure your vitamin D levels is one of the best things you can do to reduce your risks, as vitamin D is a massive immune system booster, and low vitamin D is the main cause of all respiratory infections during the colder months (when you don't get outside in the sun, because it's so cold!).

Other things you can do to reduce your risks are to:
1) eat a healthy and real food diet
2) get good quality and quantity sleep
3) reduce your stress exposure or improve how you handle stress, or use stress reduction techniques
4) use supplements and/or herbal medicines to help with the above, or to improve immune system function and for their antiviral actions
5) get outside more for fresh air, exercise, socialising, and sun time! Sadly, the current restrictions and lockdowns prevent you from doing these.

The ONLY reason you "get" an infection is because your immune defences were down. NOT because you weren't wearing a mask, or were in close proximity of someone else, or because the virus is SOOO contagious (it isn't!), or because the government said so... You only get infected when your immune system isn't working well, so do something about that with the above preventions!

Another way to reduce these restrictions and lockdowns is to not get tested, perhaps unless you are actually feeling unwell or your symptoms match that of COVID. Really, what's the point of getting tested when you are healthy and feeling well?! Because of major issues of accuracy with the PCR used for COVID testing, all you are possible going to do is get a false positive result, which the government will use to further tighten restrictions on everyone.

We are all in a massive medical and social experiment, where the people we elect or are supposed to be our health advisors do not have a clue what they are doing, and making decisions which are illogical, dangerous, and unscientific, and making all of our lives worst for it.

Stay healthy!

References:
Bundgaard, H., Bundgaard, J.S., Raaschou-Pedersen, D.E.T., von Buchwald, C., Todsen, T., Norsk, J.B., Pries-Heje, M.M., Vissing, C.R.,. Nielsen, P.B., Winsløw, U.C., Fogh, K., Hasselbalch, R., Kristensen, J.H., Ringgaard, A., Andersen, M.P., Goecke, M.B., Trebbien, R., Skovgaard, K., Benfield, T., Ullum, H., Torp-Pedersen, C., & Iversen, K. (2020). Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers. Annals of Internal Medicine. DOI: 10.7326/M20-6817

NHS. (2020). Get vitamin D supplements. Retrieved 9th January 2021 from https://www.nhs.uk/.../people.../get-vitamin-d-supplements/

What is an mRNA vaccine, how does it work, and what are the issues with this new mRNA vaccine technology?

13/12/2020

One of the new vaccine delivery systems being used by some of the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer and Moderna), is the "messenger RNA" or mRNA type vaccines. But what are these, how do they work, are there any issues with these technologies?

Messenger RNA are produced naturally in your cells. mRNA is a single-stranded RNA molecule that is created in the nucleus based on a subset of your DNA, being a particular gene. The mRNA is basically a complementary copy of a specific gene which moves out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm of the cell (Brody, 2020). Within the cytoplasm of a cell are ribosomes, tiny organelles which can be found floating or attached to the Endoplasmic Reticulum, both being protein-making factories to make a type of protein, being copies of the mRNA or gene, for use in the body (British Society for Cell Biology, 2020; Moderna, 2020).

mRNA vaccines are a new technology that tries to simulate a coronavirus infection, without actually having an infection, to train the immune system cells (the white blood cells) to recognise a coronavirus infection in the in the future and to respond more quickly to the infection. The mRNA in the vaccine is injected into the body, somehow gets into cells, which trains the cells to produce a piece of protein which matches the "spike protein" on the surface of the coronavirus, which the cells release and this stimulates an immune system response and trains the immune system to recognise and destroy the virus in a future infection (Pfizer, 2020). Allegedly.

The mRNA vaccines may be seen as having some advantages over other types of vaccines, which typically contain a dead form of the virus or bacteria, or a live (but weakened) form of pathogens. In many cases, as has been shown in many published studies, the live viruses in vaccines can become re-activated to cause the actual infection to which you are supposedly being "immunised" against. The mRNA vaccines do not actually contain the coronavirus, but a portion of the "spike protein", there is a very low risk of actually contracting COVID-19 from the vaccine (European Commission Research and Innovation, 2020).

mRNA vaccines are a very new development and not used or approved for use in vaccines before. Hence their testing for safety and efficacy MUST be done thoroughly and properly, and not rushed or fast-tracked because of some perceived emergency. The USA has an "Emergency Use Authorisation" or EUA which allows medical devices, which includes vaccines, to be fast-tracked (ie, where testing requirements are reduced) to speed up the development and delivery of such devices where there is no other option for treatment (FDA, 2020). But there is another option, it's called "your immune system"!

One possible reason why we have seen so much opposition to the drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) being recommended for its antiviral effects by governments and health departments or organisations or medicine regulators, is that if HCQ was recommended officially by the authorities, it would negate and stop the EUA requirements for any fast-tracked vaccine for COVID-19! In such a scenario, the COVID vaccine manufacturers would have to stick to the full and proper testing protocol for their products, which would take on average 7 years or more to complete in order to test, apply for approval and then produce their products. In our current COVID situation we have seen vaccine manufacturers skip standard testing processes, use unscientific testing protocols, announce a fraudulently-derived effectiveness percentage of their products, and PRODUCE tens of millions of vaccine doses, while they are still testing their product, with the regulator approval seeming to be a mere rubber stamp formality without the usual thorough investigations or analyses done to confirm the safety and effectiveness before being approved for public use.

The mRNA vaccines will not prevent COVID-19 infections. They MAY (or may not) prime your immune system to more quickly recognise a future pathogen displaying the same coronavirus spike proteins and this MAY (or may not) result in the production of antibodies. In some published studies, having a level of antibodies does not mean that you are "immune" to that infection! Multiple doses of the mRNA vaccines are needed, as the first dose does not always cause production of antibodies, leading to an initial low efficacy rate.

The mRNA vaccines will not prevent the transmission of the virus to others. It takes time (approximately 2 weeks) from the start of an infection for the immune system to ramp up its production of white blood cells to fight the infection. During this time, you can be infecting other people around you.

The mRNA vaccines will not stop an active COVID-19 infection in someone.

I still have some questions about the mRNA vaccines which need investigating and answering, because I am far from satisfied with the (lack of) thorough testing being done on these new vaccines:

1) How do the mRNA molecules in the vaccine get INTO a cell to produce the coronavirus spike proteins, when the mRMA molecules are normally only RELEASED from a cell?
2) For how long will a cell continue to make and release the COVID mRNA to stimulate the immune system?
3) How many cells are likely to become COVID mRNA protein producing factories, and how much mRNA will be produced by these "infected" cells?
4) Will the immune system see your cells with the COVID mRNA in them as being "infected" and destroy them, thus effectively stopping the vaccine from working?
5) What is the true "seroconversion" rate (the % of people who develop antibodies) after each vaccine dose for different age groups?
6) How long will the "immunity" from the COVID-19 vaccines last?
7) What is the true effectiveness rate of these mRNA vaccines in preventing COVID-19 infections?
8) What are the long-term potential adverse effects of these mRNA vaccines? (No-one knows as they are very new, and there have been NO long-term trials done).

We don't know the answer to ANY of these questions, which we really should know, especially for this new vaccine technology.

mRNA vaccines have been experimented with before, but none have been successful. Using mRNA vaccines in animal trials have suggested that the technique wasn't as safe as hoped (Chemical and Engineering News, 2018).

Contrary to many social media posts and memes, mRNA vaccines do not change your DNA! mRNA does not need to nor can enter the nucleus of the cell to change your DNA or your genes. mRNA is only used by cells outside of the nucleus... It is important to make sure that in any scientific debate or opposition to this new vaccine technology that both sides have their facts correct.

Despite the fact that mRNA vaccines cannot change your DNA, there are still MANY concerns for these new vaccines, and many questions still need to be asked and answered. MUCH more scientific testing must be done over a longer period, to truly show their safety and efficacy. And whenever there is a risk of side effects, especially in something new like this, and more so when the infection is not serious in 99.99% of the population (who quickly recover), there MUST be a choice for getting this vaccine or not.

References:

British Society for Cell Biology (2020). Ribosome. Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://bscb.org/learning-resources/softcell-e-learning/ribosome/

Brody, L.C. (2020). Messenger RNA (mRNA). Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/messenger-rna

Chemical and Engineering News. (2018). Can mRNA disrupt the drug industry? Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://cen.acs.org/business/start-ups/mRNA-disrupt-drug-industry/96/i35

European Commission Research and Innovation. (2020). Five things you need to know about: mRNA vaccines. Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://horizon-magazine.eu/article/five-things-you-need-know-about-mrna-vaccines.html

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2020). Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs). Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization

Moderna. (2020). The Science and Fundamentals of mRNA Technology. Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/science-and-fundamentals-mrna-technology

December 04th, 2020

4/12/2020

Several of the major pharmaceutical companies who are close to finishing their clinical trials of their COVID-19 vaccines have announced some very impressive results of their effectiveness, at around 95%.

Considering that no vaccine in history has come close to being 95% effective in allegedly preventing an infection, and many vaccines have never been able to be produced despite huge budgets and years of trying (such as the common cold virus, HIV, and the SARS and MERS coronavirus vaccines) how are these companies getting such results just in a few months after the outbreak? Let's look into this in more detail...

Some of the major pharmaceutical companies close to finishing their trials and producing COVID vaccines include AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna. I'll look into each of them in turn.

AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca have been running multiple trials together with Oxford University, in the UK, USA, India, Brazil, Japan, and South Africa (AstraZeneca, 2020).

AstraZeneca are being very secretive about the details of their clinical trials and their results, and not releasing the data which allegedly shows positive results (The Guardian, 2020b). After some of their competitors released their trial protocols, AstraZeneca finally released their trial protocol, but not their data. They aim to develop a vaccine with 50% effectiveness (being the FDA requirement for vaccine approval) (Becker's Hospital Review, 2020).

AstraZeneca are creating a genetically-modified vaccine using a defective modified chimpanzee adenovirus with the coronavirus spike protein. The vaccine attempts to stimulate an immune response to the coronavirus spike protein, so that the immune system will recognise the spike protein in a future infection (AstraZeneca, 2020).

Pfizer
Pfizer are developing a new "messenger RNA" (mRNA) vaccine, which does not actually contain the COVID-19 virus. Instead, the mRNA vaccine trains cells to produce a piece of protein which matches the "spike protein" on the surface of the coronavirus, which the cells release and this stimulates an immune response and trains the immune system to recognise and destroy the virus (Pfizer, 2020). Allegedly.

Pfizer is testing their mRNA vaccine on 44,000 volunteers. They reported 170 COVID-19 cases in the volunteers, with 162 in the placebo group and 8 in the vaccine group.

They get their 95% effectiveness by comparing the COVID cases between the placebo group against the vaccine group, as (8/162) * 100% = 4.9% or rounded up to 5% COVID cases in the vaccinated group compared to 95% in the non-vaccinated group. Therefore, they say their vaccine is 95% effective!

Moderna
Moderna are producing a very different mRNA based vaccine, and currently testing on 30,000 volunteers. In this trial, 95 people still contracted COVID-19, with 90 of them in the placebo group and 5 in the vaccine group.

Moderna claim their 95% vaccine effectiveness using the same method as Pfizer: (5/90) * 100% = 5.5%, hence 94.5% effectiveness or rounded up to 95%.

The COIVID vaccine clinical trials are supposed to be about:

1) Testing for efficacy (ie, effectiveness) of the vaccine to PREVENT infections, to prime the immune system and produce ANTIBODIES against the infection, to prevent TRANSMISSION of the infection, and prevent DEATHS!
2) Testing for safety, to make sure that those receiving the vaccine do not get any serious adverse effects (or ANY adverse effects, which is actually impossible), and that the vaccine is not worse than the actual infection in the short term or in the long term.

But none of the major clinical trials of the COVID-19 vaccines have been designed to record or test for these 2 critical elements of safety or efficacy! None of the current vaccine trials have been setup to detect that the vaccine will result in a reduction of infections, a reduction of symptoms, the production of antibodies, a reduction of serious outcomes such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths, or a reduction in transmissions (Doshi, 2020). Then what the hell are they actually testing?! It seems they are "testing" NOTHING at all. Other than perhaps some basic maths, which they have no real evidence for...

The vaccine companies are in fact just committing FRAUD, to deceive the regulators, the media, politicians, doctors, and YOU, for their personal financial gain. The "testing" of their vaccines is simply a race to the finish line - to be the first to be able to mass-produce billions of vaccines, while fudging the paperwork to make it look like it works, when it doesn't. As shown above, they aren't even testing their vaccines properly.

And the vaccine companies are committing FRAUD by skipping over the usual test phases (ie, animal trials, which have typically found a lot of problems in past vaccines) as well as ignoring proper safety and efficacy outcomes that they are supposed to be testing for (British Medical Journal, 2020).

They also have no idea of the long-term implications of the COVID vaccines in 3 or 6 or 12 months, or years after vaccination, as no long-term testing will be done before being released to the public. The manufacturers are also not looking at testing specific age groups - for children who have had next to no effects or deaths from the virus, or the elderly with their reduced immune response to all other vaccines, or pregnant women, or those with comorbid conditions. There will be no testing done on these factors, and people in these groups have actually been excluded from the vaccine trials (Doshi, 2020). See the attached table showing all these groups being excluded from the major vaccine trials (Doshi, 2020).

Many governments and health regulators have said that they would approve "safe and effective" COVID vaccines. I hope they will read far more into the manufacturer's testing data than the fudged effectiveness figures they are already quoting... UPDATE: I was confident that the regulators would do the right thing, but then this is 2020 and common sense and science has completely gone out the window. The UK health regulator has today (2nd Dec, 2020) approved the Pfizer COVID vaccine based on their fraudulent 95% effectiveness claims. The UK will begin rolling out this vaccine within days). (The Guardian, 2020). Also, if the Pfizer vaccine has only recently been completed and only just approved, how can they start rolling out millions of doses within days, as the company and government have said, unless it had already been producing that many vaccines for months?! So they have been producing an untested and unapproved vaccine for months, and just doing the paperwork (ie, "testing" and data manipulation) as a formality...

Most governments, such as in the USA and Australia, have already exempted the vaccine manufacturers from any liability from lawsuits due to any side effects, adverse reactions, or deaths that may result from their COVID vaccines. This isn't helping those companies to keep them honest or to test for or make a safe or effective product, as we have just seen.

Some of these concerns, and more, have been raised by other doctors and scientists, including Peter Doshi, an associate editor of the British Medical Journal, who I have referenced in this article (Doshi, 2020). He has been calling for independence and transparency in the COVID-19 clinical trials and their data and findings.

And the worst thing is... the government, and your favourite airline, cafe or restaurant, and even your job, are ready to stop you using any of these services, based on a BS pathology test which doesn't work, and a BS vaccine which also hasn't been tested properly, not likely to work or be as effective as the manufacturers say, or even be safe (as it has not been tested for this!)... All of our future lives are likely to depend on the outcomes of these vaccines, the lobbying from the pharmaceutical companies, and the stupid politicians that implement new laws based on all these fraudulent and untested vaccines.

If you make more people aware of this information and that our lives cannot and must not be dependent on these vaccines, we can stop this madness.

My next article will be on other findings of theses vaccine trials...

References:
AstraZeneca. (2020). Clinical Study Protocol - Amendment 2 -A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study in Adults to Determine the Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of AZD1222, a Non-replicating ChAdOx1 Vector Vaccine, for the Prevention of COVID-19. Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://s3.amazonaws.com/ctr-med-7111/D8110C00001/52bec400-80f6-4c1b-8791-0483923d0867/c8070a4e-6a9d-46f9-8c32-cece903592b9/D8110C00001_CSP-v2.pdf

Becker's Hospital Review. (2020). AstraZeneca releases COVID-19 vaccine protocol. Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/pharmacy/astrazeneca-releases-covid-19-vaccine-protocol.html

Doshi, P. (2020). Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us? British Medical Journal, 371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4037

Pfizer. (2020a). mRNA - Technology at the forefront during a global pandemic. Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://www.pfizer.com/news/hot-topics/mrna_technology_at_the_forefront_during_a_global_pandemic

Pfizer. (2020b). A Phase 1/2/3, placebo-controlled, randomized, observer-blind, dose-finding study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of SARS_COV-2 RNA vaccine candidates against COVID-19 in healthy individuals. Pfizer.

The Guardian. (2020a). UK approves Pfizer/BioNTech Covid vaccine for rollout next week. Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/dec/02/pfizer-biontech-covid-vaccine-wins-licence-for-use-in-the-uk

The Guardian. (2020b). Oxford Covid vaccine works in all ages, trials suggest. Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/27/covid-vaccine-uk-oxford-university-astrazeneca-works-in-all-ages-trials-suggest

Modern medicine is JUST an experiment of using toxic chemicals into malnourished people

4/12/2020

Modern medicine is just an experiment of what happens when you put toxic chemicals into malnourished bodies...

Medications don't fix anything. They just trick the body into hiding your symptoms, to make you feel better. Take for instance pain-killing medications - they perform clever things to your biochemical pathways to stop the pain-causing neurotransmitters and/or the cellular receptors from responding to the neurotransmitters, so you don't FEEL the pain. Even though the root causes of the pain are still there, still triggering the pain, and still triggering the pain neurotransmitters...

Or cough medicines which stop you coughing. Never mind that the coughing is a natural mechanism to get the infected mucus and wastes out of your body! Hence you stay more infected and sicker for longer...

Or anti-inflammatory medications which reduce inflammation. Never mind that inflammation is your immune system's natural healing process, so you are in fact prolonging your injury, preventing healing and preventing your immune system from working, which in turn can lead to more infections and over time, cancer.

Or medications to reduce indigestion, reflux, or heartburn etc, by reducing the amount of stomach acid that your stomach produces, to reduce your symptoms. Never mind that your stomach is supposed to be acidic in order to digest your food and release all the nutrients that you eat! If you aren't digesting your foods, you won't be absorbing the nutrients from your foods, and you will quickly become deficient in a large number of nutrients, which in turn cause many more symptoms and conditions, which you may likely reach for more medications to try to hide.... and never actually fix anything. All the while, your health gets worse and worse.

Medications can't fix a poor diet. Medications can't correct nutrient deficiencies. What you need instead is to fix the root causes of your symptoms, which WILL give you long-term resolution and prevention of recurrence!

Sadly, this is not what doctors or the medical system do. They "treat" symptoms (really, they just "manage" symptoms) with medications or surgery.
I instead, as a Clinical Nutritionist, Naturopath and Herbalist, focus on finding all the root causes of all your symptoms and putting together a plan to treating and fixing those root causes, as well as using better and safer options to reduce symptoms and make you feel better, while fixing the causes.

Finding and fixing any nutrient deficiencies is also a very important aspect of what I do, which can be done through signs and symptoms and/or pathology testing. It is also interesting to note that most medications actually CAUSE many nutrient deficiencies, which is also something I check that your medications are doing...

Don't just hide your symptoms! Get rid of them forever, by finding and fixing the root causes. That is what I can help you with!

Eating eggs found to be linked to causing diabetes, or do they? (Why you shouldn't believe all you read in the media!)

4/12/2020

Just because you see a new "science" article in the news or media, or even in a published study, doesn't mean it is true, accurate or believable.

Here's yet another example...

Just days before World Diabetes Awareness Day, a new study has been published linking the consumption of eggs to diabetes!

The very first line in the study states "the association between egg consumption and diabetes is inconclusive"! So they set about trying to find an association between eggs and diabetes. They performed this "study" by looking at one to seven 3-day diet diary in Chinese adults only.

The researchers and authors didn't even elaborate on which type of diabetes they were talking about in the study! No mention if it was Type 1, Type 2, Type 3 or others...

Their results found a higher egg consumption was associated with an increased risk of diabetes. Note that NO cause was actually proven! They provided no scientific basis or biochemistry to prove that eggs cause diabetes.

The study found:
• Chinese people are having a higher than global average incidence of diabetes at 10.9% of the population, as compared to 9.3% globally
• The costs of diabetes-related health expenditure in the US alone is $760 billion, and $109 billion in China
• Prevention of diabetes is very important - they got that bit right!
• Eggs provide protein, carotenoids (vitamin A compounds), arginine (an amino acid) and folate. What about all the healthy fats they missed, or the complete amino profile?!
• The authors were concerned about the high amount of cholesterol in eggs, being linked to an increased risk of diabetes by impairing insulin secretion (!). Many other studies show tha cholesterol is not the cause of heart disease or diabetes at all!
• Other studies of egg consumption being linked to diabetes had mixed results - some showing no association, some showing a small association and others were inconclusive
• A higher intake of eggs is accompanied by higher red meat consumption in US studies, which is associated with diabetes (!). No it's not...
• The study found that there was also a higher risk of diabetes due to age, being female, living in an urban area, having a higher income, having a higher weight or obesity, high blood pressure, eating "modern" meals (fast food, milk, egg, and deep fried food). Yet the authors lay the blame entirely on eggs!
• Diabetes was not associated with eating traditional meals (rice, meat and vegetables), smoking, alcohol consumption (!), vegetable consumption, or protein consumption!
• The study looked at other studies of egg consumption with diabetes and found a higher egg intake was associated with a higher intake of modern foods (as opposed to traditional foods), snacks, sweets, desserts, and refined grain products. They said that these high carbohydrate foods can increase the workload on the pancreas and cause insulin resistance (which is diabetes!).

This is a good example of a study going out to hunt for a particular biased conclusion and finding one. In scientific terms this is called a "confirmation bias" - finding an outcome that support one's prior opinions. And also a good example of the same study ignoring other more obvious conclusions or causes, and not actually proving any biochemical causation of eggs causing any health issues. Studies based on food questionnaires or surveys, especially about what one ate years ago, are highly inaccurate and no meaningful scientific outcome should be read from studies like this.

Eggs are a health food! They contain 35% protein and all amino acids, together with 63% healthy fats of a variety of types, and just 2% carbohydrates (Nutrition Data, 2020). Considering that type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease of excess carbohydrate intake, causing insulin resistance, high blood glucose (ie sugar!) levels, and inflammation, eating a food like eggs that is just 2% carbohydrates is NOT going to cause diabetes!

This study ignored all the other high carbohydrate causes of diabetes, and lifestyle factors too, such as stress. Don't blame eggs for what the toast, bread, grains, sugar, juices, sugary drinks, and alcohol (all being high carbohydrate foods) are doing to cause type 2 diabetes!

Don't get your nutrition advice from the media! Speak to a professional who can see through the bias in many studies and other poor nutrition advice. And keep eating eggs!

Stay healthy!

References:
Nutrition Data. (2020). Egg whole raw fresh; Nutrition facts and calories. Retrieved 16th November 2020 from https://nutritiondata.self.com/.../dairy-and-egg.../111/2

Yue Wang, Ming Li, Zumin Shi. (2020). Higher egg consumption associated with increased risk of diabetes in Chinese adults – China Health and Nutrition Survey. British Journal of Nutrition, 1. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114520003955

World diabetes day 2020 - Diabetes can be reduced naturally

4/12/2020

Today is apparently World Diabetes Day (November 14, 2020), to raise awareness of the condition of diabetes, and to get more funding for the diabetes associations for research into this condition.

Why? When we already know what causes the main form of diabetes (being Type 2), and how to reverse it! (Type 1 symptoms and effects can be greatly reduced and insulin requirements reduced).

Type 2 Diabetes is a metabolic condition where blood sugar levels are constantly high due to dysfunctional hormones such as insulin, leptin, and ghrelin and others. The body no longer responds correctly to these hormones. High blood glucose is very inflammatory and damaging to the body, especially to the blood vessels (causing atherosclerosis, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, skin ulcers and loss of blood supply to lower extremities, poor wound healing), damaging the nerves (causing loss of sensitivity and feeling in extremities), eye conditions, kidney damage, liver damage and more.

The Diabetes associations worldwide and most dietitians are in denial about what causes diabetes! They blame dietary fat for making people fat, which can lead to diabetes, so they claim. So they tell diabetics to eat more carbohydrates - mainly grains and grain products (breads, cereals, muesli bars, pasta), rice, oats, fruit juice etc.

But it's these CARBS which cause high blood sugars! It's the constant intake of high carbohydrate foods which maintains, prolongs and worsens the symptoms of diabetes, NOT dietary fats! Healthy fats in your diet do NOT raise your blood sugars, nor cause in insulin response. Hence fats do not cause insulin resistance, nor cause diabetes!

But diabetics are told to eat more of the very thing which causes high blood sugar - carbs! Why? Because the diabetes associations around the world are sponsored by food industry companies, such as grain companies, cereal producers, and other packaged and processed foods, to maintain their profits. The same food industry companies also sponsor the dietitians' associations around the world, so those associations will promote their products. In some countries, such as in Australia, the Dietitians Association of Australia actually wrote the government food guidelines, again favouring food industry companies' products. This is why these mostly high carb foods are promoted for everyone, and especially for diabetics. Such advice will make your health worse. See some of the attached pics fpr examples of high carb foods being promoted for diabetics.

I have reversed type 2 diabetes in people who have had the condition for years, often in a few weeks! In some, their fasting blood sugar readings dropped into the normal range within a few days! All because of getting the right scientifically proven nutrition advice and some lifestyle changes, in an easy to follow treatment plan.

If you have diabetes or someone you know does and hasn't been able to improve their symptoms in a few weeks, then I would love to help! Type 2 Diabetes is completely reversible! But it needs to be treated by someone who understands the condition and who focuses on the root causes, and not by someone who wants to just "manage" the symptoms. Make a decision to reverse type 2 diabetes today, and improve your quality of life!

The COVID-19 vaccine won't be mandatory, but illegal coercion will be used to try and make you get it

4/12/2020

If you haven't figured it out already, the whole coronavirus political agenda and resulting restrictions, lockdowns and infringements on your daily lives, is NOT about a virus. It's about governments implementing new laws for controlling the population and implementing a mass vaccination program, for a virus which affects next to no-one under 50 years of age or who has no existing chronic health conditions. Or in other words, the virus does NOT affect 99.999% of people.

The Australian Government, and other governments worldwide, have said that they would like everyone to get the coronavirus vaccine when it becomes available. Many stoopid politicians (yes, you Dan Andrews and others) have said that we can't go back to "normal" (I really hate that word now!) until a vaccine is available and the whole population gets it.

Unfortunately the Australian constitution (section 51, xxiii) states that the government cannot make any medical treatment mandatory or to use coercion to enforce a mandate, and medical treatments can only be given lawfully with the individual's full informed consent. This includes vaccinations. Various state laws in Australia also have a charter of human rights that similarly prevent medical treatments without full consent.

So instead the state and federal governments and politicians have already been warning us that a COVID vaccination will be "as close to mandatory as possible", which the Prime Minister has said recently (ABC news, 2020). But that means using coercion, which is also illegal. Never mind a few broken laws from hypocritical and lying politicians... it wouldn't be the first time.

If you decide that the new, untested, and unproven, and even unnecessary COVID vaccination is not your cup of tea, and you quite rightly want to decline it because you have read the research on the lack of safety testing or the lack of inert placebo-controlled trials (some COVID vaccine tests are using the dangerous meningococcal vaccine as the "control" group!) or you simply want to exercise your right to not have a "medical treatment" or be coerced into some government-sponsored propaganda... then you might be in for a shock.

The Australian government updated many laws during the alleged pandemic, including the Biosecurity Act (2015). It now states that (Hart, 2020):
• If an individual is required to comply with a biosecurity measure (wearing of a mask or vaccination), they can only do so if the individual consents to the measure, BUT
• An individual failing to comply with a biosecurity measure may be committing an offence, and
• The penalty for failing to comply with a biosecurity measure is 5 years in jail, or a 300-unit penalty, or both.
• Under Commonwealth Law, a "penalty unit" implies a fine of $222.
Hence a 300-unit penalty for not complying with a directive to get the COVID vaccine, which is legally voluntary (!), IF such a vaccine can actually be developed, can be $66,600! Or 5 years jail, or both.

I don't think there are enough spaces in jail for everyone who is likely to tell the government where to go with a COVID vaccine requirement, or enough court time to process all the cases. There are a couple of legal firms around Australia who are challenging many of the ridiculous fines being handed out by over-zealous police around the country, based on illegal "laws".

The potential penalties of 5 years in jail or a $66,600 fine, or both, is ridiculous, excessive, and just plain stupid - for a virus that is found only after testing people who have no symptoms, where only 0.3% of those who are tested are given a "positive" test result, based on a PCR test that reports up to 80% of results as false positives, which only causes issues in people over 50 years of age who have one or more existing chronic health issues, and when 99.9% of them still survive...

If these penalties are so excessive, to attempt to coerce you into a non-existent vaccine, while claiming that this is "voluntary" or "not mandatory", you have to wonder why does the government want to force this onto you, your family and you kids? Do you think this is fair?

Stay informed, and stay healthy!

References:
ABC News. (2020). COVID vaccine likely to be mandatory in Australia, Scott Morrison says after signing deal with Oxford University. Retrieved 4th November 2020 from https://www.abc.net.au/.../morrison-coronavirus.../12572992
Hart, E. (2020). Covid-19: Less haste, more safety. British Medical Journal, 370. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3258

Why we should not rely on PCR testing for COVID-19

4/12/2020

I've written about the PCR testing being used for testing COVID incidences in the past, in detail. Here's just a quick summary and reminder:

The PCR testing process used for COVID and other viruses was never invented for or intended to be used for diagnostic purposes! It was only designed to generate an increasing amount of genetic material (DNA or RNA) given a subset of some existing DNA/RNA.

The rt-PCR test being used for COVID testing involces a cycling function of a number of rounds that the test is repeated to generate enough DNA/RNA or genetic material from a sample to determine an alleged positive or negative result. The more cycles or rounds done in the lab, the more DNA/RNA material is generated, giving more genetic material, and therefore more people test positive for COVID.

If you cycle the test sample material 60 times, EVERY sample will generate a high amount of genetic material which is interpreted as a positive test result!
If you cycle the test sample material 30 times, SOME samples will generate a moderate amount of genetic material which can be interpreted as a positive test result, or a negative result!

If you cycle the test sample material just 10 times, every sample will have a low result of genetic material and NO-ONE tests positive!

There is no "gold standard" rule or recommendation by the WHO or anyone for how many PCR cycles are used for COVID testing. Different countries have a different number of cycles! Hence very different results of alleged incidences...

This means that the governments and labs have full control of how many people test positive or negative to COVID. And the results can be manipulated as needed...

We all should be very concerned by this abuse of science, being used to create fear of a pandemic that doesn't really exist. There MAY be a virus, but in many people who test positive but don't have or get any symptoms, there is something else going on - with the major issue being the PCR testing and interpretation of the results.

New COVID-19 vaccines may increase the risks of HIV infection

4/12/2020

In a troubling article published today (31st October 2020) in the prestigious The Lancet medical journal, and scarily ironic being Halloween, the authors of the article express concern that several of the current COVID-19 vaccines in testing may actually increase the risk of acquiring HIV, the Human Immuno-deficiency Virus linked to causing AIDS (Buchbinder, McElrath, Dieffenbach & Corey, 2020).

The COVID vaccines being developed and tested are based on new technologies, rather than tried and tested techniques of vaccine development and delivery in the past. Several of the current COVID vaccines underway are using a genetically-modified type of virus called adenovirus type-5 (Ad5) with parts of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, in an attempt to stimulate an immune response and therefore immunity to the virus. An article in the Science journal (Cohen, 2020) shows 4 of the current COVID vaccines being tested are using the Ad5 vector that raised these concerns 10 years ago.

The authors of the Lancet article published today were involved in the attempted development and testing of an HIV vaccine over 10 years ago, using the same genetically-modified Ad5 virus, but all studies during testing found that the HIV vaccine actually INCREASED the risks of acquiring HIV. This finding confirms similar studies in monkeys (Buchbinder, McElrath, Dieffenbach & Corey, 2020).

A strange finding in several studies earlier in the coronavirus pandemic, which I wrote about at the time, found that the coronavirus was a genetically-modified mix of several viruses, including the 2003 SARS coronavirus AND the HIV type 1 virus... Coincidence?! I think not.

Considering that it is the strength and good functioning of your immune system that is the ONLY thing that can prevent and protect you from any infection, and also assist you in overcoming the infection and get you back to health, the findings from the old HIV vaccine testing, and in the published Lancet article, are very concerning. The alleged purpose of any vaccine is to IMPROVE your immune system function and prevent a future infection of that pathogen. But these studies and many more show this not to be true. Some of the new COVID vaccines may INCREASE your risk of getting HIV, which reduces your immune system function (as allegedly HIV infects your immune system's white blood cells), and can then lead you to be more susceptible to COVID or ANY other infection in future.

The authors of the Lancet paper suggest that some of the new COVID vaccines will increase the risks of acquiring HIV, and they recommend testing should be done more thoroughly to prevent this. They also recommend people getting this vaccine be given full informed consent documents so they can weigh up the considerable risk of HIV based on a large amount of published studies showing this risk using the modified Ad5 virus in the COVID vaccines. Wishful thinking perhaps, as sadly, "informed consent" is never given by doctors who administer any vaccine, and the repercussions of not getting the COVID vaccine based on government warnings (despite the 99.9% survival rate of those who get it) will be severe.

Stay informed, and stay healthy!

References:
Buchbinder, S.P., McElrath, M.J., Dieffenbach, C., & Corey, L. (2020). Use of adenovirus type-5 vectored vaccines: a cautionary tale. The Lancet, 396 (10260), E68-69. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32156-5

Cohen, J. (2020). Could certain COVID-19 vaccines leave people more vulnerable to the AIDS virus? Science. Retrieved 31st October 2020 from https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/10/could-certain-covid-19-vaccines-leave-people-more-vulnerable-aids-virus. Doi:10.1126/science.abf3359

Psoriasis can be treated naturally!

4/12/2020

Today is World Psoriasis Day (October 29, 2020), to raise awareness of this autoimmune skin condition which causes unsightly skin lesions along with stress-related psychological and mental health side effects in those with the condition.
Psoriasis is one of approximately 80 health conditions which are classified as autoimmune conditions, but what does this mean, and how can naturopathy help?

Autoimmune conditions are health issues where your immune system attacks your normal cells instead of bacteria, viruses, and cancer cells, which is what they should be protecting you against. Autoimmune conditions are normally called a different name, depending on which organs or tissues are being attacked by the immune system. Such conditions cause a lot of inflammation in your body, which can cause many other symptoms other than just in the area being affected.

Examples of a few more common autoimmune conditions and the organs or regions which are affected can include type 1 diabetes (pancreas), Coeliac and Crohn's disease (digestive tract), Multiple Sclerosis (nervous system), Grave's and Hashimoto's disease (thyroid), Rheumatoid arthritis (joints), psoriasis (skin), lupus (connective tissue all over the body), and many others.

The typical medical approach to autoimmune conditions is to suppress the immune system with anti-inflammatory medications, immunosuppressives, corticosteroids, chemotherapy and other medications to try and slow down the damage. But this is a bandaid approach in that it covers up the symptoms and lessens them, but doesn't do anything for the cause or any real treatment. Suppressing the immune system is never a good idea as it can lead to a greater risk of other infections and even cancer.

The cause of autoimmune conditions is from lifestyle and dietary factors. Stress and nutrition always influences every disease, especially autoimmune conditions. There are other factors involved too, with some triggers being alleries and food/chemical intolerances, microbes and parasites, and toxic chemicals. Another major factor influencing autoimmune conditions is how well your digestive system is functioning, or the integrity of the instestinal wall.

Naturopaths are the best practitioners to help with autoimmune conditions as we do look at the bigger holistic (whole body) picture of your food intake, lifestyle, digestive system, food intolerances and all the other factors involved! With a treatment plan which treats all factors, autoimmune condtions can be slowed, prevented and even reversed!

I have treated many cases of psoriasis in the past, and some have responded very quickly to treatments, with some skin areas clearing within a few weeks, and some taking a little longer. But in many with psoriasis who have suffered for years or decades, seeing the skin improve within weeks gives a great sense of relief! Symptoms will continue to reduce over time, and the skin can clear, without the need for dangerous medications. All because the root causes are being identified and treated, along with symptom relief.

If you or someone you knows has psoriasis, or any another autoimmune condition, and your treatment isn't getting better, I'd love to help!