Ross Walter Nutritionist and Naturopath health articles and blog

ABS data shows 75% drop in birth rates since COVID-19 vaccines being approved and recommended for pregnant women

14/11/2022

One of the most controversial and tragic in all of the events over the past 3 years, despite assurances of the so-called health experts and government officials, is the effects of the "CV-19 carrot" (the so-called "prevention/treatment") on pregnant women and foetuses.

In 2021 I reported on a CDC-funded study which showed an extremely high rate of miscarriages and stillbirths in pregnant women who had the mRNA shots, at approximately 82% (Shimabukuro et al., 2021). But the authors of the study ignored the data and still claimed the carrots were perfectly safe! An independent study reviewed their data some months later and reported issues with their data and explicitly concluded an 82-92% pregnancy loss that was ignored in the original study (Brock & Thornley, 2021). This finding was dismissed by the mRNA carrot manufacturers, and medical professionals, and any posts warning people on this (including mine) were fact-checked as "false" by the social media platforms, and anyone posting such information were censored and thrown in FB jail.

Given a bit more time and the truth always comes out, or becomes harder to hide...

The most current statistics of birth rates from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), shows the tragic results of the mRNA carrots that were mandated/forced/coerced to pregnant women, despite no safety testing every being done, as pregnant women are not allowed to be used in medical trials.

Australias's birth rates have been steadily increasing from 18,000-20,000 in 1975 to approximately 22,000-25,000 in 2019-2020. Until the mRNA carrots were introduced in February 2021... (ABS, 2022).

Since May 2021, being 3 months from the start of the carrot program, the birth rates have dropped EVERY MONTH from 25,669 to just over 23,000 in October 2021... to just over 18,000 in November 2021, the lowest since well before 1975...

To just 6,659 in December 2021.

That's an approximately 75% DROP in birth rates in 6 months, or in just 10 months since the carrots were introduced, which is coincidentally the same as the duration of a human pregnancy at approximately 40 weeks or 10 months.

The data is not just about the drop in birth rates, but the approximate 20,000 babies who died from the the effects of the mRNA carrots injected during pregnancy.

The 2022 ABS data has not yet been released.

I heard of so many anecdotal stories of mothers losing their babies in pregnancy, from spontaneous abortions and miscarriages in 2021 and 2022. But some people believe that anecdotal evidence bears no scientific merit, but anecdotal evidence is ALWAYS seen first, before published studies. In new situations, anecdotal evidence MUST always be seen as the highest form of scientific evidence.

So it appears that the abovementioned 2 studies on the dangers of the carrots in pregnant women were tragically right. The heads of some companies, health officials, employers and others responsible, need to be held accountable for this, with compensation for the women affected, fines for the companies and directors, and perhaps even jail time for health officials who said the carrots were "safe and effective".

Stay healthy.

References:

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2022). Births, by year and month of occurrence, by state. Retrieved 14th November 2022 from https://explore.data.abs.gov.au/vis?tm=births&pg=0&df[ds]=ABS_ABS_TOPICS&df[id]=BIRTHS_MONTH_OCCURRENCE&df[ag]=ABS&df[vs]=1.0.0&hc[Measure]=Births&pd=1975%2C&dq=1..AUS.A&ly[cl]=TIME_PERIOD&ly[rw]=MONTH_OCCUR&fbclid=IwAR1TND3_bpZfe84RWBXD6BNqZfliOUlQzIQUtWUQWT9tbuVD_1chAHOwCGM

Brock, A.R., & Thornley. S. (2021). Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy. Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law, 4. 130–143

Shimabukuro, T.T., Kim, S.Y., Myers, T.R., Moro, P.L., Oduyebo, T., Panagiotakopoulos, L., Marquez, P.L., Olson, C.K., Liu, R., Chang, K.T., Ellington, S.R., Burkel, V.K., Smoots, A.N., Green, C.J., Licata, C., Zhang, B.C., Alimchandani, M., Mba-Jonas, A., Martin, S.W., Gee, K.M., & Meaney-Delman, D.M. (2021). Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons, New England Journal of Medicine, 384 (24), 2273–2282. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983

0 Comments

New study finds no benefit from wearing masks for preventing coronavirus infection, but they cause many issues

9/4/2021

0 Comments

The heavily debated topic of wearing masks as a preventative against the SARS-2 coronavirus is still an issue. On one hand it may appear to the media, the general public and politicians that wearing of masks makes sense to reducing your risks of this or other respiratory infections. But many published studies actually show that the wearing of masks has very limited scientific evidence, despite what you may have heard in the media or from health authorities.

A new study published in January 2021 has investigated and summarised many other studies on the use of different types of masks (or no masks) on the prevention of transmission of the SARS-2 coronavirus, as well as the health risks and complications that the wearing of masks may cause (Vainshelboim, 2021). This new study is very appropriate, with many people currently affected by governmental mask mandates.

Some interesting points in this new study, found these observations (which were found in other studies too):

N95 respirator masks are tight-fitting commercial masks which have a filter for the incoming air to reduce exposure to infectious or damaging particles. The filter makes breathing more difficult. However N95 respirator masks offer NO protection to other people, if the wearer has any respiratory infection, as there is no filter on exhaled breath, hence can INCREASE the transmission of infections to others!
Surgical masks are designed to be used in STERILE environments (such as in hospitals) more as a barrier against splashes, spit and other body fluids to prevent contaminating the wearer. As they are very loose fitting, they offer very little protection from infections to other people
Fabric and cloth masks offer the most minimal protection or filtration
The majority of COVID deaths were in the elderly with chronic health conditions already. The SARS-2 virus may exacerbate existing conditions but rarely causes death by itself
Masks can restrict breathing, to cause hypoxemia (low oxygen pressure in the blood), hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide in the blood), increased respiratory complications, self-contamination (from repeated touching of surfaces and the mask, or breathing in contaminated air), and exacerbation of existing chronic conditions
Conversely, increasing breathing and especially oxygen intake levels has been used for medical treatments for hospitalised patients and especially those with COVID-19 symptoms
Mild or moderate hypoxemia or hypercapnia from wearing masks can change energy metabolism, decrease pH levels (towards acidic) in cells and blood, and cause toxicity, oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, immunosuppression (poor immune function, at a time you really need it working!), and health deterioration
Severe hypoxemia and hypercapnia can cause cardiopulmonary and neurological conditions, including heart attacks, arrhythmias, dizziness, high or low blood pressure, fainting, fatigue, headaches, and other issues including death
Using surgical masks for a longer time (60 mins) can reduce the blood oxygen saturation by more than 1%
Masks are ineffective at blocking viral particles that are much smaller than the gaps in the threads of the masks, and filtration of masks is very poor
Breathing through masks increases the temperature and humidity of the mask and respiratory tracts, causing the release of toxic chemicals from the mask's materials, increasing the risks of breathing in other pathogens and toxic contaminants
There have been studies looking at the effects that masks have on reducing transmission or infectivity between people infected with SARS-2. There was no difference in transmission rates between those who wore masks or not.
Another study found no transmissions from an asymptomatic SARS-2 carrier to 445 others, even in a shared quarantine space for an average of 4-5 days
Even amongst healthcare workers, masks and respirators were not effective against transmission of viral infections, in many studies
One RCT study looking at cloth masks found a 13-times higher risk of flu-like illness, compared to those wearing a surgical mask or no mask
More studies comparing N95 respirators and surgical masks found no reduction in virus transmissions in the community (even with over 33,000 participants)
The World Health Organisation (WHO) changed their guidance on wearing masks from early 2020 to say that "masks were not required as no evidence was available for their benefit", to a few months later say that even cloth masks "can prevent the infected wearer transmitting the virus to others, and offer protection to the HEALTHY wearer against infection", but based on limited or no evidence
The CDC has stated that only people with symptoms should consider wearing a mask, and in asymptomatic people the wearing of masks was not recommended
There are many possible physical facial harms to the wearer of masks, such as lesions, dermatitis, worsening acne, and other discomfort
People with mental health disorders, developmental disabilities, hearing problems, or living in humid environments, children, or those with respiratory conditions, are at SIGNIFICANT health risk for complications and harm
Wearing of masks remove self-identity and affects social interactions and relationships, resulting in poor mental and physical health
Wearing of masks was associated with a 50% increase in mortality due to depression, anxiety, and suicide
The fear associated with the pandemic and effects of wearing masks activates the "flight or fight" response of higher cortisol (stress hormone) and its effects on the body - reduced brain function, and greatly reduced immune system function, being the natural and fundamental body system that is needed at this time to protect you from infections or to fight them
The long-term consequences of wearing masks can be severe and devastating, as a result of physiological and psychological stresses and the hypoxemia and hypercapnia effects - including increased risks of heart disease and cancers, due to effects on the blood and a reduced function of the immune system.

The study concludes with the following points:

Scientific evidence is lacking for the wearing of masks to reduce mortality or morbidity from infectious or viral diseases including the SARS-2 coronavirus
Both medical and non-medical masks are ineffective to reduce human-to-human transmission and infectivity of SARS-2 and COVID-19
Wearing of masks has adverse physiological and psychological effects
Long-term consequences of wearing of masks on health are severely detrimental.

Local, state and federal governments, businesses and companies, public health advisors, doctors, and other healthcare practitioners MUST give quality advice based on the scientific evidence, NOT on what may appear to be common sense (that the wearing of masks in this alleged pandemic may appear to be). There is very little scientific evidence (or none that I have seen) that shows that wearing of any type of mask offers protection to the wearer or to others, for the prevention of transmission of viral respiratory infections, including the SARS-2 coronavirus.

All health authorities should reconsider the mask mandates in light of this study, and many others. There are other better ways to reduce the risks of this virus, and improve immune system function and overall health, to prevent infections or protect you from them. That is what they have NOT done thus far in this pandemic and this has to change.

Sadly you can't quote this and other studies as a reason to not wear a mask. But you can and should use the available medical exemptions to not wear one, especially for children, or those with respiratory conditions, mental health conditions, disabilities, or other valid reasons.

Stay healthy!

References:
Vainshelboim, B. (2021). Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis. Medical Hypotheses, 146, 110411. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110411

0 Comments

a one world diet attempts to save the planet and feed the world but will cause more nutrient deficiencies and disease

16/3/2021

0 Comments

In 2019, I wrote a series of articles to critique the EAT-Lancet Commission report, on a proposed new "one world diet" which alleged to save the environment as well as feeding the world. It sounds like a great plan, except it had some massive holes and wouldn't work to achieve either goal. You can read my earlier articles on this plan here:

http://www.rosswalter.com.au/art.../category/eat-lancet-diet

The initial report received wide media coverage and praise until some independent investigations (including from me) found the the proposed new diet was woefully deficient in multiple nutrients (include vitamin B12, vitamin D, vitamin K, sodium, potassium, calcium, iron, omega-3 fats, protein and amino acids, and more!) which was not sustainable for anyone to avoid health conditions.

The EAT-Lancet diet was in effect an optional-almost-no-meat, plant-based diet, but included manufactured or highly processed plant-based foods. The extremely low animal products would comprise 1/5 of an egg, 2/3 of a fish finger, 1/4 of a rasher of bacon, 1/16 of a burger pattie, or 1.5 chicken nuggets! And even then, animal-based foods are optional! No wonder it was so nutrient deficient! A subsequent investigation into the financial requirements of the EAT-Lancet diet concluded that approximately 1.5 BILLION of the world's 7 billion population today would not be able to afford the EAT-Lancet diet! (Hirvonen, Bai, Headey & Masters, 2019). The EAT-Lancet new world diet was a failure.

EAT-Lancet is an interesting collaboration of the EAT Foundation Group, founded by a billionnaire vegan couple, and The Lancet, a medical and scientific journal. The EAT-Lancet Commission and report was funded by The Wellcome Trust, a charity with pharmaceutical company roots (Eat Forum, 2019). Almost all of the report's authors and contributors were vegans - it was a highly biased group, and their report showed this. The group is attempting to meet the Umited Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement (for climate change) (EAT-Lancet Commission, 2021).

Recently, EAT-Lancet group is back with a new report, full of wonderful quotes and proposals, which deserve to be investigated again, so here are some key points:

• They make many unsubstantiated claims why the future of the planet is dire if we don't all make huge changes to the food supply system and improving nutrition for everyone. They claim that a diet rich in plant-based foods and fewer animal sources will improve health and environmental benefits. But offers no scientific references to back this claim.
• They make no differentiation between organic or grass-fed animal sources of food, versus factory-raised (and grain-fed and other garbage-fed) animals or processed meats, which can give significant differences in health.
• They forget that animals IMPROVE the soil with nutrients and bacteria, and even sequester more "carbon" into the soil (and meat) from the air than what they give out. They also forget that roaming animals do not need vast clearing of native forests, unlike mass mono-plant agriculture (ie, plant farming is more damaging to the environment, than animal farming).
• They make no differentiation between highly processed factory-produced plant sources of food (ie plant protein, soy, GMOs etc) and fresh, whole plant foods.
• They make no mention of the huge transportation issues of getting plant foods to people, or encouraging many people with gardens to grow their own foods!
• Their dietary recommendations are still based on useless calories, but it can be used as a good comparison, for example they recommend 811 calories PER DAY from grains (wow! An epidemic of Diabetes here we come), 78 calories from vegetables, 153 calories from dairy (and never mind the many cultures who traditionally haven't accessed or consumed dairy, and shouldn't), just 30 calories from beef, lamb and pork, 62 from chicken, 19 from eggs (remember just 1/5 of one!), a huge 284 calories from legumes (and again many can't tolerate these or the pea protein powder it mostly comes from), and a whopping 354 from unsaturated plant-based oils, and even 120 calories PER DAY from sugar.
• Their aim is to double the consumption of plant-based foods (except starchy vegetables which are to be limited, despite them being rich source of fibre...), limit red meat (highly nutrient-dense), and with eggs, chicken and dairy being optional.
• Reducing food waste is a goal too, and a good one as up to 45% of food produced is wasted or thrown out because of picky choosing by supermarkets and other food companies, limited resources for picking or processing, not being consumed quickly enough, or other causes. However reducing waste is a much later goal, when it should be done first...

The EAT-Lancet Commission haven't learnt from their earlier failure - no change has been done to their original plan to fix the issues with their "new world diet", to correct the obvious and highly damaging nutrient deficiencies that are present in it. On one hand the report says it is about trying to improve food quality and quantity to feed everyone in a sustainable way, but doesn't actually provide the nutrients it claims.

With all the other political and health agendas going on at the moment and for the past 12 months, this is another part of it. A committee of a few people cannot realistically come up with a plan that will address or fix the entire planet or improve the health of the entire population. These co-called experts did a terrible job of putting together the original report and the "study" of their proposed "one world diet" being the EAT-Lancet diet, with massive issues that were found by independent investigations, but still haven't been fixed 2 years later. I'm sure these experts won't personally be relying on 1/5 of an egg for their daily animal-based protein intake...

This is a plan for CAUSING chronic nutrient deficiencies and disease in the ENTIRE population, while pretending to save the planet and improve health. Pretty much the same as another agenda going on at the moment...

Yes the food supply needs improving in many ways, but this diet or plan is not the way it can be done.

Stay healthy!

#foodcanfixit #fktheEATLancetdiet #fkthenewworlddiet

References:

EAT Forum. (2019). How was the EAT-Lancet Commission funded? Retrieved 8th March 2021 from https://eatforum.org/eat-lancet.../eat-lancet-funding/

EAT-Lancet Commission. (2021). Healthy Diets From Sustainable Food Systems: Summary Report from the EAT-Lancet Commission. Retrieved 6th March 2021 from https://eatforum.org/content/uploads/2019/01/EAT-Lancet_Commission_Summary_Report.pdf

Hirvonen, K., Bai, Y., Headey, D., & Masters, W.A. (2019). Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis. The Lancet, 8 (1), E59-E66. Doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4

0 Comments

Australia's TGA bans doctors from telling you which COVID-19 vaccine you will get

27/2/2021

7 Comments

Australia's medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), being a government organisation and therefore they do what the government tells them to do, has announced that they are banning health providers, doctors and pharmacists from revealing which COVID vaccine that people will get (News.com.au, 2021; TGA, 2021c).

The TGA are supposed to be responsible for ensuring that medicines etc are safe and effective, and protecting the Australian population from unsafe products. They are supposed to work for US.

Sadly the TGA have shown their true colours in this pandemic, starting back in early February 2020, when they released a warning to all health practitioners (medical and alternative) to not recommend any treatments or preventions for the coronavirus, unless there was specific published evidence for their use against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (TGA, 2020). They ignored and effectively banned many existing and effective antiviral and immune supporting preventions and treatments from being used, thus potentially killing many Australians as a result.

As the federal government promised to buy tens of millions of doses of COVID vaccines from different suppliers, all of them before those companies actually completed their clinical trials, the TGA recently granted PROVISIONAL approval for the use of the Pfizer and AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccines. This was despite the limited and pathetic testing done, and no independent testing being done by the TGA, the current vaccine rollout is still part of the TGA's ongoing investigations into the vaccines. Basically, the vaccine rollout is STILL part of the clinical trial (ie, experiment or testing) of the vaccines! And we are the lab rats.

The TGA also recently announced an unusual relaxing of labelling requirements to the COVID vaccines and packaging, to remove the vaccine name and manufacturer, as well as other warning and "POISON" notices that normally apply to vaccines (TGA, 2021a). We were told that this was because the initial vaccines would be imported into Australia wouldn't meet the TGA's requirements of labelling. That could have been easily fixed by the manufacturers printing new labels, but with their latest announcement of hiding the vaccine name from patients, it makes more sense that they were planning to hide the vaccine name all along.

I heard a RACGP (professional association for GPs) representative in a TV interview last week saying that health professionals in NSW would get the Pfizer vaccine, and everyone else will get the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine. But according to official government statistics from the UK, the Oxford/AZ vaccine is causing over 67% more serious adverse reactions and deaths than the Pfizer vaccine (UK Government, 2021a; UK Government, 2021b). Hands up if you want to get the more dangerous one? No-one? That's why they don't want you to know which one you will get...

The Pfizer vaccine is available in Australia but only in limited numbers - 10 million doses, compared to over 50 million doses each for the Oxford/AZ and Novavax vaccines (Australian Government Department of Health, 2021). It seems that the Pfizer vaccine is for the "special" people, but the far more dangerous Oxford/AZ vaccine will be for everyone else.

The TGA are now threatening doctors and medical clinics with huge fines and jail to prevent them from advertising which vaccine they have, the brand name, the ingredients (ie mRNA or other vaccine) or other information which may enable consumers to identify the particular vaccine.

Even worse is that the TGA have also banned health clinics and pharmacies from implying that the vaccines can cause harm (News.com.au, 2021). So they are banning "informed consent" to people to actually help them decide if they should get this vaccine or not? The human right of informed consent for medical treatments (in the Australian Constitution) says that informed consent MUST be given for someone to make a voluntary decision without coercion, to decide on any medical treatment or therapy. The TGA are (again) acting illegally here.

The TGA have a database for recording vaccine reactions and side effects, called the Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN). Actually they have TWO adverse events databases, with one internal system called AEMS (Adverse Event Management System) which records adverse event reports, but only after a period of 3 months does this internal-only data get transferred to the publicly-available DAEN database (TGA 2021b). Luckily other countries make their vaccine adverse reactions and deaths data available immediately so we can see how bad they are - although only a fraction of adverse events or deaths are reported, as the process is voluntary and doctors don't often add to it. Also, if you don't know which vaccine you get, how can you report an adverse event? Was this part of their plan all along?

Does this sound like the TGA are acting for the benefit of the Australian public and their health? Do you think that your government really cares about you or your health? Of course not. Are you still keen to line up for your Russian roulette shot of the more dangerous version of the COVID vaccine?

Stay healthy!

References:

Australian Government Department of Health (2021). Australia’s vaccine agreements. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.health.gov.au/node/18777/australias-vaccine-agreements

Newscorp. (2021). TGA bans pharmacies from revealing which COVID-19 vaccine they offer. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/tga-bans-pharmacies-from-revealing-which-covid19-vaccine-they-offer/news-story/8bcf3dea974537050600d7f87eb8e13c

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2020). Warning about products claiming to treat or prevent the novel coronavirus. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/warning-about-products-claiming-treat-or-prevent-novel-coronavirus

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021a). Therapeutic Goods (Poisons Standard) (COVID-19 Vaccine-Pfizer) Labelling Exemption 2021.
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021b). Reporting Adverse Events. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/reporting-adverse-events
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021c). Advertising COVID-19 vaccines to the Australian public. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/advertising-covid-19-vaccines-australian-public?fbclid=IwAR0pl0FqOjRLM0eQwaZV5GiVLJen_2V1gVwo9RmCld5pJO7KCVVJrw-sMlc
UK Government. (2021a). COVID-19 mRNA PfizerBioNTech vaccine analysis print. Retrieved 9th February 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/964207/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print__1_.pdf
UK Government. (2021b). COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print. Retrieved 9th February 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/964208/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print__2_.pdf

7 Comments

This is not a real pandemic (Part 2)

27/2/2021

1 Comment

I wrote my list of "This isn't a real pandemic" observations of events some months ago, which can be found here: http://www.rosswalter.com.au/articles/this-is-not-a-real-pandemic. A lot has changed since then but some things are still the same, that this still isn't a real pandemic. Because:

A real pandemic doesn't need social media platforms to censor posts that are repeating official news sources, or published research studies or statistical analyses that question the official narrative (ABC News, 2021)
A real pandemic doesn't require Police to visit the homes of people who question the official narrative on social media to silence them
A real pandemic doesn't need to give lessons in schools to brainwash children into not believing any anti-government information such as anti-vax beliefs (Ilford Recorder News, 2021)
A real pandemic doesn't need a marketing plan and advertising blitzes (also known as propaganda) to encourage people to get the vaccine, such as Australia's $24 million media campaign (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021a)
A real pandemic doesn't need to give medical clinics and doctors financial incentives to encourage their patients (with coercion, which is illegal) to get vaccinated, with Australia's doctors set to make up to $49.50 per person (plus $10 per person to the medical clinic) for a total of $ 1,528,006,886 (over $1.5 BILLION) to vaccinate every Australian (Australian Government, 2021)
A real pandemic doesn't need to offer financial incentives to encourage the general public (aka, "bribes") to get the vaccine
A real pandemic doesn't need to pay celebrities to appeal to people in marketing campaigns to get the vaccine
A real pandemic doesn't have nurses, doctors, celebrities or politicians needing to fake getting the vaccine live on TV, to encourage people to think it's safe and to get it too (yes we saw the needle was empty, or the plunger not pushed in, or the needle cap was on...)
A real pandemic doesn't cover up the death of a nurse who got the vaccine live on TV then collapsed shortly afterwards when interviewed, because you weren't supposed to see that happen and they still want you to get the vaccine
A real pandemic doesn't need to call sudden lockdowns and restrictions based on ONE random case after weeks or months without any cases or deaths
A real pandemic doesn't need to mandate wearing of masks suddenly across a state or nation, again when one case is identified after weeks or longer without incidences, especially when wearing of masks was actively discouraged at the height of incidences and deaths in the early months of the pandemic
A real pandemic doesn't need restrictions being placed on everyone, to protect the 0.1% who are at risk - being elderly people with more than one health chronic health condition
A real pandemic doesn't allow tens of thousands of people to congregate at large scheduled sporting matches (football, cricket, tennis etc) but not allow more than a few people at your home or in a shop at the same time
A real pandemic doesn't need you to scan a QR code and enter your real or fake contact details so your movements can be traced, in order to enter shops, buy food, or use services
A real pandemic doesn't require a "vaccine passport" to prove you had the vaccine, in order to travel, attend school, attend work, use government services, eat at a cafe or get money from your own account at a bank...
A real pandemic doesn't need governments to indemnify pharmaceutical companies from legal liability and lawsuits, from adverse reactions or deaths that the vaccines are known to cause (Sydney Morning Herald, 2021b)
A real pandemic doesn't need insurance companies to indemnify doctors and other health professionals from legal liability and lawsuits from adverse reactions or deaths that the vaccines can cause
A real pandemic doesn't need deliberate fear-mongering by politicians or the media, for a virus with more than a 99% survival rate (remember the early videos in China of people just collapsing in the street and dying?! That only happened there, as the start of the fear campaign)
A real pandemic would have governments and health officials telling people the truth and giving more practical advice to prevent and treat the infection by improve the immune systems of everyone, which can be done naturally, easily, and cheaply. Improving the strength and function of your immune system is the major factor which will protect you from this virus..

Hence this still isn't a real pandemic. It is a PLANdemic.
Be informed. Be empowered. Question everything. And stay healthy!

References:
ABC News. (2021). Facebook to take down all false vaccine claims, not just those related to coronavirus. Retrieved 12th February 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-09/facebook-to-take-down-false-vaccine-claims/13134828

Australian Government. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Retrieved 12th February 2021 from https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/01/covid-19-vaccine-rollout-expression-of-interest-for-primary-care-participation-in-phase-1b_1.pdf

Ilford Recorder News. (2021). Lessons in schools to counter the anti-vaxxers. Retrieved 12th February 2021 from https://www.ilfordrecorder.co.uk/news/education/school-lesson-designed-to-explain-vaccine-7320540

Sydney Morning Herald. (2021a). COVID-19 vaccine advertising campaign to target specific fears. Retrieved 12th February from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/covid-19-vaccine-advertising-campaign-to-target-specific-fears-20210109-p56svi.html

Sydney Morning Herald. (2021a). Vaccine suppliers given indemnity for 'inevitable' side effects. Retrieved 12th February from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/morrison-government-grants-indemnity-for-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-20201008-p5636o.html

1 Comment

Body autonomy rights - your body your decision your health

8/2/2021

0 Comments

Body autonomy is the right of every person to make their own decisions about their body without external influence or coercion.

Body Autonomy particularly relates to health and medical decisions, and is incredibly relevant today in this alleged mandatory vaccine environment.

The constitutions of many countries or laws of many states or countries support body autonomy, and especially so in Australia where our constitution specifically makes it illegal for any medical treatment to be mandated, forced or even coerced without voluntary choice based on full informed consent of the risks vs benefits.

Some politicians have stated that COVID vaccinations will be mandatory, and others have said that restrictions will be placed on those who choose not to take the vaccine. Such restrictions have said to include the ability to travel, work in government services, access government services and benefits, attending government buildings, being able to work in private companies, get healthcare, attend movies or even eat in restaurants or drink in bars.

I warned about "digital COVID passports" being developed in early 2020, and now many companies are jumping on board to develop this technology, to track and monitor everyone, everywhere. This coronavirus plandemic is just the excuse to bring in these new laws that ignore and trample all over your rights.

You cannot let politicians make illegal decisions like this that ignore the constitutions and laws of countries. You must stand up against this tyranny.

It's your body, your decision, your rights, and your health. And someone else's body is their decision too.

0 Comments

The coronavirus is a killer, of human rights

8/2/2021

0 Comments

COVID-19 is a killer.

Mainly of older people with existing chronic health conditions, sadly.

But COVID-19 is also a killer of:

- the common cold and flu
- heart disease
- cancer.

Due to incidences from these conditions being classified as "COVID-19" or deaths from these being classified as a "COVID death".

COVID-19 is also a killer of:
- common sense
- thinking
- logic
- science. Science died in 2020. RIP.

In the wider community, COVID-19 has killed:

- the working class
- millions of businesses and jobs
- many world economies.

Between people, COVID-19 has killed:

- human connections
- socialisation
- relationships and friendships
- compassion
- free speech
- autonomy
- trust in the media, governments and medicine
- human rights
- hope
- love.

But these can be turned around! Look after yourself, your health and your family. Stand up for yourself, and do what is or feels right for YOU.
We can get our lives and world back again, and it will be better than before!

0 Comments

The COVID-19 vaccine won't be mandatory, but illegal coercion will be used to try and make you get it

4/12/2020

0 Comments

If you haven't figured it out already, the whole coronavirus political agenda and resulting restrictions, lockdowns and infringements on your daily lives, is NOT about a virus. It's about governments implementing new laws for controlling the population and implementing a mass vaccination program, for a virus which affects next to no-one under 50 years of age or who has no existing chronic health conditions. Or in other words, the virus does NOT affect 99.999% of people.

The Australian Government, and other governments worldwide, have said that they would like everyone to get the coronavirus vaccine when it becomes available. Many stoopid politicians (yes, you Dan Andrews and others) have said that we can't go back to "normal" (I really hate that word now!) until a vaccine is available and the whole population gets it.

Unfortunately the Australian constitution (section 51, xxiii) states that the government cannot make any medical treatment mandatory or to use coercion to enforce a mandate, and medical treatments can only be given lawfully with the individual's full informed consent. This includes vaccinations. Various state laws in Australia also have a charter of human rights that similarly prevent medical treatments without full consent.

So instead the state and federal governments and politicians have already been warning us that a COVID vaccination will be "as close to mandatory as possible", which the Prime Minister has said recently (ABC news, 2020). But that means using coercion, which is also illegal. Never mind a few broken laws from hypocritical and lying politicians... it wouldn't be the first time.

If you decide that the new, untested, and unproven, and even unnecessary COVID vaccination is not your cup of tea, and you quite rightly want to decline it because you have read the research on the lack of safety testing or the lack of inert placebo-controlled trials (some COVID vaccine tests are using the dangerous meningococcal vaccine as the "control" group!) or you simply want to exercise your right to not have a "medical treatment" or be coerced into some government-sponsored propaganda... then you might be in for a shock.

The Australian government updated many laws during the alleged pandemic, including the Biosecurity Act (2015). It now states that (Hart, 2020):
• If an individual is required to comply with a biosecurity measure (wearing of a mask or vaccination), they can only do so if the individual consents to the measure, BUT
• An individual failing to comply with a biosecurity measure may be committing an offence, and
• The penalty for failing to comply with a biosecurity measure is 5 years in jail, or a 300-unit penalty, or both.
• Under Commonwealth Law, a "penalty unit" implies a fine of $222.
Hence a 300-unit penalty for not complying with a directive to get the COVID vaccine, which is legally voluntary (!), IF such a vaccine can actually be developed, can be $66,600! Or 5 years jail, or both.

I don't think there are enough spaces in jail for everyone who is likely to tell the government where to go with a COVID vaccine requirement, or enough court time to process all the cases. There are a couple of legal firms around Australia who are challenging many of the ridiculous fines being handed out by over-zealous police around the country, based on illegal "laws".

The potential penalties of 5 years in jail or a $66,600 fine, or both, is ridiculous, excessive, and just plain stupid - for a virus that is found only after testing people who have no symptoms, where only 0.3% of those who are tested are given a "positive" test result, based on a PCR test that reports up to 80% of results as false positives, which only causes issues in people over 50 years of age who have one or more existing chronic health issues, and when 99.9% of them still survive...

If these penalties are so excessive, to attempt to coerce you into a non-existent vaccine, while claiming that this is "voluntary" or "not mandatory", you have to wonder why does the government want to force this onto you, your family and you kids? Do you think this is fair?

Stay informed, and stay healthy!

References:
ABC News. (2020). COVID vaccine likely to be mandatory in Australia, Scott Morrison says after signing deal with Oxford University. Retrieved 4th November 2020 from https://www.abc.net.au/.../morrison-coronavirus.../12572992
Hart, E. (2020). Covid-19: Less haste, more safety. British Medical Journal, 370. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3258

0 Comments

Australian government says COVID vaccine will be mandatory

23/8/2020

2 Comments

On 19th August 2020 the Australian Prime Minister, Scott Morrison, announced that the government had a deal with pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca and would supply 25 million doses of their new Oxford COVID-19 vaccine, and it would be free and mandatory to all Australians (Prime Minister of Australia, 2020).

Social media channels and groups went crazy... accusing the PM of making illegal or unconstitutional decisions, or not taking into account personal choice or medical or other reasons why some people cannot or should not get this vaccination.

Then 2 interesting developments happened later that same day:

1. The PM backflipped on his decision to make the new COVID vaccine mandatory, saying in a later interview that people would be "encouraged" to get the vaccine, but it wouldn't be made mandatory

2. Representatives of AstraZeneca gave their own press release to say that they did not actually have an agreement with the Australian government to supply so many vaccines, or when (or if) that might happen, or where the vaccines would be made.

The government will "encourage" people to get the COVID vaccine will no doubt be done with major coercion tactics, which is still highly unconstitutional and illegal. Much like the new rule (note, NOT a law) in NSW schools, that any student displaying ANY symptoms of COVID, will be excluded from the school immediately, and will not be able to return until having been tested for COVID and returning a negative test result. What if a kid sneezes from dust, or has hayfever (spring is coming very soon, being hayfever season), or coughs just ONCE from a dry throat? There goes their schooling for week or so EACH time this happens?

Meanwhile in Wuhan, China, being the centre of the outbreak, people were attending parties and a water park in their thousands, and with no social distancing or masks, or a vaccine in sight...

Some of my thoughts on the PM's decision:

The PM's announcement was extremely premature, as the AZ/Oxford vaccine is only in Phase 3 trials, with no guarantee at all that it will a) work, or b) be safe, or c) not cause more infections or side effects than the actual infection (as other vaccines do)
Vaccine development and testing normally takes 7-10 years. The Oxford vaccine has been only several months in development and fast-tracked testing. This doesn't exactly fill me with confidence about their product
Speaking of testing, the Oxford vaccine has not been done properly so far - they have not used an inert placebo in their clinical trials! They used a completely different vaccine as the "control" or placebo group, being the dangerous Meningitis vaccine (Folegatti et al. 2020). This ploy is done deliberately by the manufacturer to hide the side effects and reactions to make the vaccine appear "safer" than if it were actually tested against a true inert placebo such as saline
Will COVID be the excuse to bring in the new "No jab, no social security benefits", "no jab, no travel", "no jab, no work", "no jab, no money" or "no jab, no food" plan for control of the adult population in Australia? Many have predicted this earlier in the plandemic, and it is seemingly coming true. Is this ok with you?
Why didn't the PM support one of the several Australian companies performing vaccine trials?!
Why do we even need a vaccine at all, when the virus only causes issues in those who already have chronic health issues? For example, there are no child, teen, adolescent or young adult deaths in Australia at all. In fact no women under the age of 50 have died from COVID! NONE! Those who have sadly died all had one or more chronic health conditions
Why do 100% of the population need such a vaccine when 99.9% of people who allegedly have it, SURVIVE and without any vaccine?!
Why is a vaccine needed when incidence rates and death rates all over the world are at their lowest levels after just a few months? The SARS and MERS coronavirus pandemics died out on their own, similarly after a few months, and without any vaccine
If masks are allegedly effective, then why do we need a vaccine?
If there is a risk from taking a vaccine, then it cannot be made mandatory, and must not be done via coercion. As all vaccines have a risk of side effects or adverse events, any vaccine cannot and must not be mandated. Accepting side effects or even death from a vaccine (which DOES happen) for "the greater good of others", is a BS concept, and is not acceptable
Since there is a risk with every vaccine, but more so with a fast-tracked vaccine (ie, less safety testing being done), why are the vaccine manufacturers granted indemnity to lawsuits where their product may injure, maim or kill someone? Is this a risk you are willing to take?
Why should everything in the future be linked to getting the COVID vaccine? As I wrote about months ago, there are many future plans being implemented that the coronavirus is simply the excuse to enable them. More people started to see this when the PM made his recent ridiculous announcement.

People who have expressed opinions or concerns in social media groups, or in public against the PM's decision are not "anti-vaxers". They are simply concerned about a questionable vaccine that still doesn't exist, and all future plans of their lives being controlled and linked to an exaggerated virus epidemic and being forced to have an untested and (at this point) unsafe and unnecessary vaccine, for an infection that is no worse than the flu, based on a dodgy PCR test and manipulated statistics of incidences and deaths, where people are allegedly dying in droves from a virus, but really dying of one or more chronic health conditions instead.

People are becoming more awake to the fact that we cannot trust the media, and cannot trust their elected representatives in government, to actually tell the truth. This whole plandemic is a farce, with an attempt to bring in mandatory vaccinations, control over your lives in every way. Don't let this happen.

We should all be questioning every government minister's decision, to keep them honest and knowing that they represent us and are supposed to make positive decisions FOR us, and not what their corporate masters or globalists want. Write and complain to your local and federal member, to express your concerns, and tell them what you will do with your vote in the next state or federal election. You MUST tell your representatives, or they will get away with this, and your life, and that of your kids will never be the same again.

Stay healthy, and question everything.

References:
Folegatti, P.M., Ewer, K.J., Aley, P.K., Angus, B., Becker, S., Belij-Rammerstorfer, S., Bellamy, D., Bibi, S., Bittaye, M., Clutterbuck, E.A., Dold, C., Faust, S.N., Finn, A., Flaxman, A.L., Hallis, B., Heath, P., Jenkin, D., Lazarus, R., Makinson, R., Minassian, A.M., Pollock, K.M., Ramasamy, M., Robinson, H., Snape, M., Tarrant, R., Voysey, M., Green, C., Douglas, A.D., Hill, A.V.S., Lambe, T., Gilbert, S.C., Pollard, A.J. (2020). Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 396 (10249), 467-478. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31604-4

Prime Minister of Australia. (2020) . Media Release: COVID-19 vaccine for all Australians. Retrieved 20th August 2020 from https://www.pm.gov.au/media/new-deal-secures-potential-covid-19-vaccine-every-australian

2 Comments

A brief history of the COVID-19 saga, what might be yet to come, and recommendations to prevent this happening again

3/6/2020

0 Comments

Just in case you arrived on earth from a distant planet in the last few weeks, you might notice that things are have been a little weird, crazy, or absolutely dumbfoundingly stupid of late. We have had a little issue with a little bug called the "coronavirus", or "SARS-CoV-2" (aka "SARS version 2") which causes an infection called "COVID-19" which you are statistically unlikely to get, suffer from (directly at least), or die from. Yet the entire planet is suffering from a "we're all gonna die" media campaign.

Here is a summary of observations and learnings from the coronavirus pandemic thus far:

The virus is man-made, as shown from multiple studies of the genetic code of the virus
Studies have not found an animal host source of the virus, and other studies have found no close relative to the coronavirus, based on genetic analysis and comparison to similar strains
Scientists in various biowarfare labs around the world (China, USA, UK, Australia and perhaps more countries) are complicit in the development of the genetically-modified man-made coronavirus at the centre of this pandemic, through years of repeated genetic manipulation of other coronavirus types to increase their ability to infect human cells. The main lab responsible for much of the genetic modification of the coronavirus, based on their published studies of their work, was based in Wuhan, China
The initial statistics of incidences and mortality rates from the country of origin, China, cannot and should not have been believed, being a communist country with a secretive government with a history of suppressing the media and inaccurate information being told
The PCR testing of the coronavirus, used to determine incidences of infection, is inaccurate
Statistics of coronavirus incidences therefore are inaccurate and should be ignored
The WHO have directed countries (and their medical systems) to classify deaths (by "falsifying" death records) as being from COVID-19 based on an inaccurate test, and/or assumptions of infection without testing, or deaths from chronic diseases, suicides, shootings, flu and pneumonia and other respiratory conditions, and other deaths as being from the virus
Statistics of coronavirus mortality rates therefore are inaccurate and should be ignored
The media are experts in manipulating the inaccurate statistics to create an environment of fear throughout the world during this alleged pandemic
The fear from the media has caused major divisions in families, workplaces, friends and communities, between those who believe the media scare campaigns and those who have done their own research or who have personal experience, or who are "free thinkers"
Governments and authorities have recommended people to "report" those who do not appear to be believing or following the recommended guidelines, thus further dividing communities in a time they keep broadcasting "we are all in this together"
Governments and their health authorities and even the WHO have not recommended simple, cheap, effective and proven ways to prevent or treat people from the coronavirus. They have deliberately withheld information, lied about effectiveness (or non-effectiveness) of preventative strategies and treatments, and instead promoting hygiene and isolation until medications or a vaccine are available (for which there are still none available)
Governments and their health authorities and even the WHO, have ignored the many natural preventions and treatments that have past evidence of effectiveness against other viruses, thus contributing to more infections and deaths
There is plenty of quality published evidence of the effectiveness of natural therapies such as therapeutic doses of vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, selenium, to support or improve one's immune system function against any infections, as well as lifestyle improvements of regular exercise, reducing stress, improving sleep, and eating a nutritious diet and low processed food to reduce blood sugar levels. However this advice and recommendations have not been suggested by the WHO or government health authorities - why?
The WHO, governments and health regulators, such as Australia's TGA, have effectively banned and gagged all health practitioners (both medical and complementary/alternative) from making any recommendations to prevent or treat the coronavirus, and have actively prosecuted companies and individuals who have spoken out against the government or defied these regulatory guidelines
It is well known in many published studies of the seasonal nature of respiratory infections around the world, for the common cold, flu, pneumonia, and even asthma. Such respiratory infections occur at much higher rates in the colder months of the year, in this case the northern hemisphere countries being far more affected being their winter and autumn during the early months of the pandemic
The seasonal effect of all respiratory infections occurs when the sun is further away from one hemisphere of the earth, which receives less solar radiation, resulting in low sun exposure and low vitamin D levels. Vitamin D is a potent anti-inflammatory compound, and immune system strengthening hormone. A vitamin D deficiency is a key causative factor in respiratory infections as shown in many published studies. Yet the government health authorities have not mentioned preventative advice to get safe sun exposure or vitamin D supplementation to reduce incidences or mortality rates
The media and government health authorities have focussed on the virus itself - to try and avoid the virus through unproven mass isolations, lockdowns and shutdowns, and hygiene practices, still being based on old 1800s "germ theory" practices that an exposure to a germ will mean an infection with the virus
The "germ theory" of old has been disproved, as not everyone who is exposed to an infective pathogen will actually "catch" the infection or show symptoms. Whether someone exposed to a virus will develop symptoms, and how quickly (or not) they get over the infection is due to the effectiveness and strength of their immune system, NOT the effectiveness and strength of the virus
Humans cannot avoid a virus or other pathogens, but we can improve our immune system effectiveness and strength to find and deal with infections such as the coronavirus
Some countries such as Sweden, Taiwan, Japan and others did not implement nationwide lockdowns, business shutdowns or "preventative" isolations for their populations. They did, however, recommend voluntary isolation of those at risk, with chronic health conditions, respiratory and cardiac conditions or the aged. The rest of the population could carry on as usual. If they were exposed to or become infected with the coronavirus, they would then develop a personal immunity and community herd immunity to the virus into the future
Herd immunity is a theory that if a certain percentage of a population are immune from an infection, they can "protect" or reduce incidences amongst those who are not immune, and the infection can die out in time. However herd immunity is only possible through a reasonable percentage of the population actually contracting the infection and developing antibodies to it. Antibodies produced from a natural infection last a lifetime. Unlike from vaccines which simulate a forced infection - antibodies may not be produced at all, hence why multiple boosters are required, or if they are produced, only last a few months to a few years at most. Hence herd immunity cannot occur even in 100% vaccinated populations. Mandating a flu vaccine or coronavirus vaccine (if it can ever be produced) will not allow a herd immunity to occur
The WHO is open to corruption through large private donations of alleged philanthropy, but in reality being for influence of the world's health organisation. The Gates Foundation are the second largest donor to the WHO, behind the USA, which suggests a huge conflict of interest especially given the foundation's many other investments in this pandemic. Such influence over the WHO must stop
The Gates Foundation are major investors in every part of this pandemic - from funding biowarfare labs who perform genetic modification of coronaviruses, to funding many pharmaceutical companies to develop untested fast-tracked vaccines or medications, to funding the reuse of existing medications that have no proven evidence of effectiveness against this virus, to developing virus test kits, to pretending to being an alleged health advocate or expert on this virus pandemic, to funding a company developing RFID tracking chips being injected at the same time of the vaccine, funding a worldwide technology platform to track people using their implanted ID chips in real time, and many other conflicts of interest with other companies
The UN have aligned with a UK cyber security firm to produce an electronic COVID-19 identification and health status passport called COVI-PASS. Plans have been made to record the coronavirus pathology testing results, virus immunity status, and vaccination status, and more, to be recorded and needing to be held by every person. Intentions are for this system to be used for other tracking and identification purposes for travel, workplaces, and many other locations, and potential restrictions imposed on those who do not meet certain eligibility criteria
Deeper investigations of mortality rates and published studies suggest a mortality rate from COVID-19 at just 0.1%, being on par with a severe seasonal influenza (Fauci, 2020)
With such a small mortality rate, based on corrected and proven statistics resulting in a survival rate of 99.9%, the massive worldwide disruptions were completely unnecessary
A mandated worldwide vaccine, as frequently being promoted by Bill Gates and many governments, based on these corrected mortality rates, is completely unnecessary given a 99.9% survival rate in those who have the coronavirus infection
The worldwide shutdowns, lockdowns, isolations, and their resulting effects on families, businesses, companies, stock markets, investments, and the economy, were completely unnecessary
Educated and expert scientists and medical/health commentators on social media platforms have provided a more balanced and even more accurate source of information during the pandemic, and those working in hospitals giving their first-hand personal and proven accounts of their experiences which are the opposite of the government information being given
Social media platforms have increased censorship of many aspects of the pandemic, to suppress sharing of information and even deleting entire accounts from knowledgeable experts, scientists, doctors, virologists, and more, because their expert scientific opinion differs from the approved government narrative or the opinion of the platform owners and their advisors. Luckily Trump has very recently banned social media platforms from censoring personal opinions and even expert advice that didn't fit the beliefs of the platform owners - freedom of speech is to reign again!

Recommendations that are needed in the aftermath of this plandemic:

There needs to be an independent investigation of the recommendations by the WHO to all governments on how to classify COVID-19 deaths, and investigations into every classified death and adjustments to statistics made accordingly to make them accurate
Investigations by the media authorities in all countries, to improve the accuracy of news information, as much of it has been a fear-based scare campaign, highlighted by opinionated and biased TV hosts who do not have a clue of what is really going on in this plandemic
The genetic modification of dangerous pathogens, to increase their ability to infect human cells, or any other "gain of function" testing or manipulation MUST be banned worldwide from now and forever
The WHO need to be completely disbanded and a new and independent government-only funded health organisation created, for the benefit of every person. There should be no corporate or private sponsorships or funding allowed, no conflicts of interest allowed, and equal opportunities being given for proven natural therapies to be recommended for prevention and treatment options, along with safe and effective medical treatments as needed
Many more people of the world have awoken to the massive manipulation of them during this plandemic. People are now aware of the corruption and conflicts of interest in the WHO, state and federal governments, and the media, to lie, to cause fear, to divide communities, and implement new laws to restrict movements, interactions, and lifestyle choices. Any further restrictions or mandates related to this plandemic, because of the abovementioned manipulations of incidence and death rates, corruption and conflicts of interest, are unnecessary and will not be tolerated by the people.

Keep aware. Keep disbelieving. Keep researching. Keep informed. And keep healthy.

(References provided in previous posts on this topic on this page)

0 Comments

a new digital passport is needed to return to life after the coronavirus

25/5/2020

0 Comments

There have been a lot of accusations of conspiracy theories, fear-mongering and pseudoscience being used against those who have posted contrary information, links, articles and videos through this coronavirus pandemic, and theories of what might be coming in the future.

Slowly, more of the alleged theories are appearing to be coming true. More studies are showing the virus was man-made in a lab in Wuhan, China. Studies are showing the PCR testing for coronavirus is inaccurate but being used by the WHO and world governments to make radical changes to restrict our way of life. Classifying COVID-19 deaths is a complete scam, orchestrated by the WHO to cause fear amongst populations, by classifying deaths by any chronic disease, shooting, suicide, or other cause as being from the virus, and the mortality statistics then promoted by a biased and alarmist media.

More accurate statistics of the plandemic are emerging, of a survival rate of 99.9% on average, with very little to no medical treatments available and no coronavirus vaccine. So why all the fuss?

Despite having many less incidences and deaths now, or nearly none at all now, we are seeing tighter restrictions in workplaces, having to give names and contact details prior to entry into shops or cafes, being recommended to wear masks when we go out now (but not earlier in the plandemic when there were more cases!)... what other restrictions do the authorities have in mind?

Well, here's a new one. Are you ready and wanting to travel, access various services or enter your workplace, when restrictions are allegedly "reduced"? Well, make sure you have your "COVI-PASS" digital passport ready to show the authorities, to prove who you are and that you have been a good and faithful citizen with up-to-date coronavirus vaccination, immunity test status to the coronavirus, and a good health rating. This is highly reminiscent of Nazi Germany...

The COVI-PASS is developed and available from a UK cyber security firm (VST Enterprises), and has now been accepted under contract by the United Nations for "various projects", including the post-coronavirus situation. VST say on their website that the digital passport will be expanded to be a much broader personal ID and health passport to cover all personal identification, financial transactions, health testing and history, and proof of vaccinations. Their clients and users of the digital health passport include private companies, airlines, hotel chains and leisure organisations. They say that the COVI-PASS will facilitate safe return to work and life. Why, when cases have dropped almost to nothing, naturally? More details here - https://v-healthpassport.co.uk/

The COVI-PASS is the implementation of the outcomes of the world-wide digital ID plans from the ID2020 summit in 2018. The ID2020 alliance believes it is a human right to "prove one's identity". No, a right to PRIVACY is an essential human right. Bill Gates and Microsoft are an alliance partner to the ID2020 project. More on this alliance can be read here - https://id2020.org/

If you value your right to privacy and right to choose your health options, I guess these services, and maybe more, might be limited to you in the near future. Unless you send a clear message to your governments, employers and companies that you will not be a part of their New World Order of authoritarian control of your health and your life.

0 Comments

Proof that the coronavirus is a man-made, genetically-modified virus, and not the result of a natural mutation

16/5/2020

0 Comments

In the very early days of the coronavirus making the news (late January 2020), a study was pre-published (awaiting official publishing and peer-review) which suggested that the coronavirus may be man-made (Pradhan et al. 2020). The authors of the study performed an analysis of the genome of the virus, and found it was mostly based on the 2002 SARS virus, but also allegedly found to have 4x insertions of the HIV virus in its genetic code. Such genetic differences could not have happened naturally. This caused a major stir at the time, and the scientists were criticised as perhaps mocking the seriousness of the new epidemic (as a pandemic hadn't been announced at that time), and the authors of the study withdrew it from publishing due to pressure from the scientific community. The authors intended to revise the study and perhaps republish it.

Many rumours and debates have persisted as to the origins of the virus - did it come from bats or another animal, how did it cross over into humans, and was this a natural process or man-made?

A few months have passed and more studies have been published on many aspects of the coronavirus. The official line from the WHO and our governments is that the coronavirus was a natural development or mutation, from a still-unknown animal source, and some studies have published these findings.

But governments and their agencies lie. They all do. All the time.

I've not believed a lot of the scary information in the media since day 1 of this infection. I've looked into the statistics of it and why they do not make any sense and cannot be believed. The testing of the virus is questionable and inaccurate, and the classification of deaths is a rort - a process recommended by the WHO to falsely inflate death rates, which has so many people unnecessarily scared of this virus, leading to politicians making disruptive and damaging policy changes which have affected us all. For what intents and purposes we still do not fully understand, but a lot of things in this pandemic stink of untruths. Especially on the issue of whether the virus is man-made or not.

A pivotal new study was published in the prestigious Nature Medicine journal (Andersen et al., 2020). The authors investigated the genetic code of a key part of the coronavirus and compared this to other known coronaviruses, to come to a conclusion that the new coronavirus was a natural mutation from one of several possible animal sources, of which still has not been identified. Their conclusion was pretty definitive. Except their conclusion and theories were not supported by their own results, but it helped negate many "conspiracy-theory" social media posts and instead supported the narrative of the media and governments and their health departments.

The figure (shown above) from the Andersen study clearly shows the genetic code differences between the different animal coronavirus types and the 2002 SARS coronavirus too. The marked and different coloured areas show the genetic differences. A major problem with the scientists' conclusions is the INSERTION of a 12-nucleotide section in the "Human-SARS-CoV-2" coronavirus sequence (notes with a star in the figure) which is COMPLETELY MISSING from every other coronavirus type known. Such a large genetic difference cannot happen randomly or naturally. It's not even in the alleged bat coronavirus as the source of this pandemic. The coronavirus didn't come from bats. Such an insertion can only come from a lab.

The scientists claim the impact of this inserted sequence is unknown but that it appears to enhance infection in human cells. But they still claim that the virus is of natural origin!

The details of one study is not be enough proof to make an assertion that the coronavirus is man-made...

In a another recent pre-published study (Wu et al., 2020), the scientists compared the genetic code of the new coronavirus with the earlier SARS and MERS pandemic viruses, and a bat coronavirus too. They also looked at the equivalent of the genetic family tree of the coronavirus, with respect to a major component of the virus - its spike protein that is used to attach to and infect a cell. It was found that the coronavirus was closest to the 2002 SARS virus and the bat coronavirus, with some major differences. Some minor mutations were found to exist between the current coronavirus and SARS coronavirus, and the virus binds more strongly to ACE-2 receptors (and other receptors) on human cells than SARS, hence why it can infect more people. See the phylogenic tree diagram above.

The phylogenic tree diagram (a genetic evolutionary family tree) for the coronaviruses starts in the 12 o'clock position and is progresses clockwise to newer generations of coronaviruses. Notice that the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is more recent. Early coronaviruses are highlighted in pink, as containing a particular location or sequence, called a "furin cleavage site", in its spike protein. The furin cleavage site disappeared several generations ago in the coronavirus family tree, but somehow magically reappears again in this new coronavirus genetic code. The ACE-2 and furin binding sites on cells throughout the body (not just in the lungs) increases the infection of this virus throughout the body to affect more organs as has been seen. This study also noted the addition of the same 12-nucleotide section of genetic code noted in the previous study that was missing from other coronavirus strains. This insertion is thought to be a reason why this virus is stronger than SARS. The study also found and recommended many medications, nutrients and herbals which would be effective against the furin site of the virus - including 4 HIV medications which is significant given the earlier finding of the alleged HIV insertions in the coronavirus genetic code. The WHO have announced trials of HIV drugs to determine their effectiveness against this virus (Kupferschmidt & Cohen, 2020).

The above finding of the coronavirus specifically using the ACE-2 receptors on cell walls to infect cells is very important. Several studies have been published in recent years by scientists performing genetic modification on the SARS coronavirus and others, and even creating a chimera virus - containing genes from multiple viruses, even from different animals. In one such study by Menachery et al. (2015), genes from a bat coronavirus spike protein were added to a mouse coronavirus genome and tested for its ability to infect human airway cells through their ACE-2 receptors. The man-made virus was tested in mice AND HUMANS with significant infections occurring. The study concluded that there was "a significant risk of a SARS coronavirus re-emergence". The fact that scientists are deliberately manipulating (ie, "playing with") the genetics of deadly viruses, and testing them for their ability to cause human disease, is a major concern.

This study included a Chinese Virologist, Shi Zhengli (or Zheng-Li Shi), who just happens to be the team leader of the researchers in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a BSL-4 biowarfare lab where this study was conducted, just a few miles from the alleged epicentre of the pandemic in the Wuhan seafood market... And the study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), a US government agency.

The Chinese virologist and world expert on bat coronaviruses, Shi Zhengli, has been a part of several other published studies on coronavirus research. In another study published in 2008, Shi Zhengli and colleagues created new chimera coronavirus by "inserting different genetic sequences of the SARS coronavirus into different animal coronaviruses", to investigate how well the man-made virus could infect the ACE-2 receptors of human and animal cells (Ren et al., 2008). They found that the chimeric virus initially didn't infect human cells, so the scientists then combined a human HIV virus with it, which then DID enable it to infect human cells. Their work was to deliberately get the genetically modified virus to infect human cells. The authors wrote that this was the first time that a virus was proven to cross over from animals into humans - but was only done through deliberate genetic modification in a lab (in Wuhan).

The above studies compared a bat coronavirus to the new virus, and found a high genetic similarity of up to 96% (Xiao and Xiao, 2020), but more importantly are the differences. The bat coronavirus lacks the furin binding site, and lacks the huge gene insertion that is responsible for its infective ability in humans. According to testimonies by local Wuhan residents and those who frequented the seafood market, the bats which were found to host the bat coronavirus lived 900 kilometres away in caves, and bat was NOT traded or ever a food source in the Wuhan market (Xiao and Xiao, 2020).

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) have an online tool called BLAST (NIH, 2020) for logging, comparing and researching the genetic code of organisms. After my earlier research articles on the coronavirus topic when I questioned the government and media narrative, a follower sent me details on how to use the BLAST tool to check on the genetic code of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus for similarities with the genetic code of other viruses. Using the BLAST tool, it reported 4 similar gene sequences in the coronavirus that matched other viruses - or more accurately, 4 matching gene sequences from 1 other virus. The Human Immunodeficiency Virus, HIV type 1.

See the BLAST results in the figure above.

Two of the 4 HIV sequences in the SARS-CoV-2 virus code matched 100%, one matched at 94%, and another at 79%, still being very significant. See screenshot for results. This finding does seem to confirm the finding in the original study by Pradhan and colleagues (2020), and confirm the study by Ren, Shi Zhengli and colleagues that they inserted HIV genes into a genetically-modified SARS virus to increase its ability to infect human cells. Somehow, somewhere and by someone, accidently or deliberately we cannot determine at this time, this genetically-modified lab-made chimeric virus escaped into the wild to infect humans. It is almost beyond any possibility that the current coronavirus was a natural mutation and animal crossover event.

Is there evidence of knowledge and technology for scientists to CREATE a virus - YES.

Is there evidence of the SARS and other animal coronaviruses being genetically modified - YES.

Is there evidence of deliberate experimentation of coronaviruses to increase their ability to infect human cells - YES.

Is there evidence of the HIV virus being used in coronavirus experiments and being found in people infected with coronavirus - YES.

Is there evidence that the coronavirus was the result of a natural mutation and crossover into humans - based on these studies and evidence, it is highly unlikely at best. I'd say NO.

Based on the evidence here, this would lead to an uncomfortable conclusion that the coronavirus is not a natural mutation of any known coronavirus strain, but in fact a man-made strain. And if it is indeed man-made, as it appears, then more uncomfortable questions need to be asked - was it released accidentally or deliberately, by whom, and for what purposes?

There have been a lot of theories labelled as "conspiracies" in this pandemic. As more evidence is found, more of those conspiracies are becoming fact.
If the virus is man-made, then anything which comes afterwards, in the form of new laws, restrictions, recommendations and mandates, must seriously be questioned and stopped.

An independent worldwide and open investigation MUST be conducted NOW to find out who is responsible for this pandemic - how the man-made coronavirus escaped from a lab, why, and for what or whose benefit. This cannot be conducted by the WHO, UN, CDC, FDA or other government or world health agencies as they are already suspiciously involved in this pandemic or involved in the suppression of scientific studies or educated voices who have questioned their actions (or lack thereof) in recent times.
Also, the genetic modification of all infective viruses and bacteria MUST STOP NOW. These dangerous practices cannot be allowed to happen again.

(Full PDF document with graphics and references is available from the link below. Feel free to download and share this!)

References:
Andersen, K.G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W.I., Holmes, E.C., & Garry, R.F. (2020). The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Medicine, 26, 450–452. Doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9

Kupferschmidt, K., & Cohen, J. (2020). WHO launches global megatrial of the four most promising coronavirus treatments. Science Magazine. Retrieved 14th May 2020 from https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03/who-launches-global-megatrial-four-most-promising-coronavirus-treatments

Menachery, V.D., Yount, B.L Jr, Debbink, K., Agnihothram, S., Gralinski, L.E., Plante, J.A., Graham, R.L., Scobey, T., Ge, X-Y., Donaldson, E.F., Randell, S.H., Lanzavecchia, A., Marasco, W.A., Shi, Z-L., & Baric, R.S. (2015). A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence. Nature Medicine, 21, 1508–1513. Doi: 10.1038/nm.3985

National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2020).

Pradhan, P., Pandey, A.K., Mishra, A., Gupta, P., Tripathi, P.K., Menon, M.B., Gomes, J., Vivekanandan, P., & Kundu, B. (2020). Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag. BioRxiv (preprint). Doi: 10.1101/2020.01.30.927871

Ren, W., Qu, X., Li, W., Han, Z., Yu, M., Zhou, P., Zhang, S-Y., Wang, L-F., Deng, H., & Shi, Z. (2008). Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARS-Like Coronavirus of Bat Origin. Journal of Virology, 82 (4), 1899-1907: doi:10.1128/JVI.01085-07
Wu, C., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, P., Wang, Y., Wang, Q., Xu, Y., Li, M., Zheng, M., Chen, L., & Li, H. (2020). Furin, a potential therapeutic target for COVID-19. Retrieved 14th May 2020 from http://chinaxiv.org/user/download.htm?id=30223

Xiao, B., & Xiao, L. (2020). The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus. Retrieved 14th May 2020 from https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128_The_possible_origins_of_2019-nCoV_coronavirus

proof_that_the_coronavirus_is_man-made_gmo_virus.pdf
File Size:	959 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

0 Comments

The most dangerous and unqualified doctor in the world is Bill Gates

6/4/2020

38 Comments

An unlikely organisation has emerged from the coronavirus pandemic fires of doom, which the media have been feverishly stoking about the current outbreak, in an attempt to be the hero and saviour of us all. Are they really going to save us, or what might their real intentions be?

I'm talking about the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, started by Bill Gates, the founder of the Microsoft Corporation, but of late he has mostly been working through his family foundation as an apparent philanthropist. The foundation aims to “ensure that more young people survive and thrive”, by being able to “access quality healthcare and education”. In reality the major aim and funding of the foundation is for the prevention of common infectious diseases through drugs and vaccinations.

Sorry this is long, but there's a LOT of evidence of too many coincidences and pre-planned projects in place leading to this pandemic and this current situation that we are all in.

The trouble is that the foundation may not be as as innocent or as generous as they try to portray. The reasons for this are as follows:

The World Health Organisation (WHO) used to receive all their funding for health programs from the governments of the world. Now they also allow private "donations" from organisations such as the Gates Foundation, which are actually one of the largest sponsors of the WHO, second only to the US government. Such large donations, especially from a private organisation, carry a lot of political weight, or in other words "favours" or influence over decisions and outcomes. A published study in 2015 specifically mentioned the Gates Foundation as having a huge influence over world governments in their decision-making. The study suggests that "big philanthropy" is actually good for the donor's business, and warns world governments and large organisations that such philanthropy can overly influence political decisions and needs to be analysed for risks and side effects on the development or decisions of these countries and organisations. Details of this study is here: https://www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/GPFEurope/Philanthropic_Power_online.pdf
The Gates Foundation also has major shareholdings in many pharmaceutical companies, after investing many hundreds of millions of dollars with them. The purpose of this, of course, is to make money from the increasing share price and dividends paid out on the shares owned. There’s nothing wrong with making money, but given the rest of the points here, it starts to get a little suspicious.
Bill has been hinting or warning several times in recent years about a worldwide pandemic which will kill a large percentage of the population (he has estimated about 30 million people will die in a pandemic). Even as recently as 2017 and 2018, Gates was giving speeches to large audiences and warning world leaders, medical professionals and scientists that we need to be prepared for pandemics and bioterror attacks. He said “because history has taught us there will be another deadly global pandemic". No, history only tells us what happened in the past! It was like he KNEW a pandemic was about to happen! He also said "And, as biological weapons of mass destruction become easier to create in the lab, there is an increasing risk of a bioterror attack". Well, that's what you get when you give your Foundation's money to BSL-4 biowarfare labs for research, Bill! Here's a website link of his which details a speech he gave (which includes the above quote) on this issue in full: https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/Shattuck-Lecture
Again in 2019, Bill Gates featured in and produced a Netflix documentary series called "Explained", and in an episode called "The Next Pandemic", he said in an interview that he predicted a coronavirus-style pandemic which would kill millions of people. He even warned of such a virus coming from a "wet market" (a market selling fresh meat, fish or produce, often associated with live animals) in China! He said it would take years to find a cure for a new virus outbreak. Just months later, it happened - is Bill psychic too?! Details of the documentary featuring Bill Gates and his prediction can be found here: https://metro.co.uk/2020/01/31/bill-gates-predicted-coronavirus-type-pandemic-kill-millions-2019-netflix-documentary-12159314/

On October 18th, 2019, a high-level pandemic planning exercise called "Event 201" was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum, to plan for a global viral pandemic. By pure coincidence (again!) this meeting was simulating a pandemic caused by a new coronavirus outbreak! None other than the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were a major sponsor of this event. Just 6 weeks after this planning event the first known cases of a new coronavirus started appearing in Wuhan, China. Coincidence?! The odds would be nearly impossible for this to happen... In an official John Hopkins University press release (on Nov 6, 2019), the coronavirus pandemic simulation estimated a death toll of 65 million people within 18 months. Various social media "fact-checking" (ie "censorship") has confirmed that this Event 201 took place, but they have been denying that the simulation actually predicted the number of deaths. However, information from the University shows that they actually DID include predictions of death rates of approximately 65 million people, and their predictions can be read here: https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/11/06/event-201-health-security/
In 2015, the Pirbright Institute, a biotechnology research organisation in the UK, filed a patent for a live attenuated coronavirus to be used in the production of coronavirus vaccines. The Pirbright Institute is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Very recently (in November 2019, just before the coronavirus outbreak and another coincidence?!) the institute received $5.5 million dollars (their largest funding donation) from the Gates Foundation for research into human diseases and vaccine development. Details here: https://www.pirbright.ac.uk/news/2019/11/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-funds-development-pirbright%E2%80%99s-livestock-antibody-hub
Another type of coronavirus was responsible for the SARS pandemic in 2002. Luckily this one fizzled out with only 800 deaths. In the aftermath of this infection, many institutions and research organisations rushed to patent the SARS virus and its genetic sequence. This was apparently to prevent other scientists from working on the virus. Natural things and organisms are not meant to be patented, as patents are supposed to be for inventions or futuristic ideas. The Gates Foundation funded Pirbright Institute owns the SARS coronavirus patent. And this patent expired the day before the first case of the new SARS-CoV-2 infection was announced.
The Gates Foundation have funded another vaccine research and drug production company, called Moderna. Within a few weeks of the coronavirus outbreak starting, Moderna was apparently ready for human testing of their coronavirus vaccine! The timing of this is unheard of, being a world record by several orders of magnitude over past vaccine development times. It’s almost as if they already had a vaccine ready and waiting! Moderna announced on 25th February 2020 (just a few weeks after the outbreak became known), that they have not only created a coronavirus vaccine in record time, but have tested it on animals, and now is ready for human testing. This process normally takes many months to years to get to this stage. No vaccine company managed to develop a vaccine for the SARS or MERS coronavirus outbreaks in 2003 or 2013 respectively, or since, so how could Moderna do this within days?! What about all the other communicable diseases for which there is no vaccine for, such as malaria, the common cold, and HIV? If this company can somehow create a new vaccine and have it ready in weeks, then why haven’t they done the same for other infections? Had they already been working on this one for some time, as planned? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronavirus-vaccine-moderna-human-testing/?fbclid=IwAR27_MQ7ySGwnWPg4HCpBLCznt4vbgbh8yn8ALhhZ8CCvWPJ_pML7DlyQHg#
The Gates Foundation also very recently funded another pharmaceutical company (Inovio Pharmaceuticals) with $5 million for work on a portable "drug delivery device" for a DNA-based coronavirus vaccine. What is a DNA-based vaccine? No idea, but we will find out shortly, as the company is starting human trials in April 2020. Details here: https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/biotech/story/2020-03-12/inovio-pharm-gets-5m-from-gates-foundation-to-further-covid-19-vaccine-project
Bill has said publicly several times in interviews or presentations that the world population is too high, and needs to be reduced. In a 2010 TEDx talk he said, ”The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent”. A segment of his public talk when he said this statement is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNmj6Ug-a4A. Some people have said that his words have been taken out of context, and that he was talking about reducing population growth, rather than reducing the actual population. But note that was not what he said in this video.
It is interesting that Bill Gates and his Foundation are huge promoters of vaccines to developing countries. I personally think people in these countries preferentially need 1) improved nutrition, 2) clean water, and 3) better sanitation and modern utilities such as electricity and waste processing (ie sewerage systems) to reduce infections, illnesses and deaths. But not the Gates Foundation, as their priority is just vaccines for population control. It was these 3 improvements to our lives that massively slowed the incidences and deaths from infections, decades before vaccines were made available.
On 28th February, 2020, Bill Gates actually had an article published in the New England Medical Journal, one of the major scientific and medical journals! In his article, he was talking about the coronavirus, which he again referred to as the "once-in-a-century" pandemic, to urge governments to help poorer countries in this outbreak, and to fund vaccines and treatments, and strengthen their healthcare. Where will a lot of this government (ie, taxpayer) funding go to - to companies funded by the Gates Foundation! Details of his published article is found here: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2003762
On 29th February 2020 (one day after the last point), Bill Gates announced to the world that the coronavirus IS a pandemic and should be announced as such, over a week before the WHO officially did announce the pandemic. In his announcement, he claims that the coronavirus is a "once-in-a-century pathogen" which may kill up to 50 million people. Bill was generously offering solutions to the pandemic through his Foundation – obviously, as he appears to have planned well for such a situation! Of course one of his solutions is a fast-tracked vaccine, using techniques from one of the companies his Foundation has funded, that apparently make it possible to produce vaccines within weeks. Never mind the testing process which is supposed to take years before they can be made available to the public. Bill’s pre-emptive announcement that this is a pandemic is found here: https://www.businessinsider.com.au/bill-gates-coronavirus-pandemic-solutions-2020-2?r=US&IR=T
Microsoft, with Bill Gates still on the board of directors at the time (in January 2018) were a founding partner of a summit named ID2020. This summit was held at the United Nations, and attended by and formed alliances between governments, the UN, non-government organisations and private companies. This event's objectives are to "improve lives through digital identity", and "accelerating access to digital ID... to vulnerable populations", and more. Their manifesto lists a number of points, one being "the ability to prove one's identity is a fundamental and universal right". No, the right to privacy, and being free to roam and not being tracked 24/7 is a fundamental and universal human right. Microsoft have pledged financial and technology resources to this project. Details of the ID2020 Summit and its purpose can be found here: https://id2020.org/manifesto and here: https://www.teleinfotoday.com/enterprise-it/digital-transformation/accenture-microsoft-create-blockchain-solution-to-support-id2020
In a recent interview (24th March 2020) with Chris Anderson (the Curator of TED Talks), Bill suggested that there should be a system of "certificates" that people will need to carry around to show who has recovered from the COVID-19 infection, and who is vaccinated (when the COVID-19 vaccine is made available), as he doesn't want people moving around the world who haven't been vaccinated for this infection. This is sounding like restrictions of movement or travel, unless you have been vaccinated and have identification papers to prove it - much like everyone having to carry ID papers with them at all times in Nazi Germany. France is using such movement certificates now for people to be able to leave their houses. However the "certificates" being considered by Bill are in a digital form, of either a microchip being inserted under the skin, or a "quantum-dot tattoo". A segment of this interview can be viewed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGsqtF0MhlI&fbclid=IwAR2cLpYvlYHCXfFYEaROYb0qRlOpRotjIRCAibjY-v1cr6vt8j36QnJIyG0
The Gates Foundation have also funded a project with MIT in December 2019, to develop a digital form of vaccination certificate, by storing data in encapsulated microparticles stored under the skin. These particles are injected at the same time as the vaccine using a microneedle patch, rather than a typical needle and syringe. More details about this technology, a related published study, and the Gates Foundation funding of it can be found here: http://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218
In an interview with CBS on 2nd April 2020, Bill was giving advice on health policy and strategies on the current pandemic. He was also giving estimates of how long this issue will last. Again he was promoting his vaccine companies and vaccines being the key to stopping this pandemic, before we can go back to our normal lives. Note the hint that you may not be able to go back to your normal life without a vaccine (and a fast-tracked vaccine which won't go through all the usual tests for safety). As he is not a doctor or health expert, he should not be interviewed or having a say on this topic, because of all of his conflcts of interest here. He did also suggest that there could be more pandemics in the future. His interview can be viewed here: https://www.cbsnews.com/video/extended-interview-bill-gates-on-coronavirus-pandemic/
In a recent online Q&A session on Reddit (March 2020), Bill called for a "national tracking system similar to South Korea" to monitor people with an infection to "understand where the disease is". Again, more monitoring, tracking and control of the population. Details of this can bre read here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattperez/2020/03/18/bill-gates-calls-for-national-tracking-system-for-coronavirus-during-reddit-ama/
On 28th March 2020, The Gates Foundation announced an alliance with the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (run by Facebook Founder, Mark Zuckerberg and his wife) and Mastercard and the Wellcome charity for finding affordable treatments for COVID-19. They announced they were working together with the WHO on a "COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator" to evaluate and repurpose existing drugs for treating this infection. They claim that since these existing medications have completed clinical trials, it would make them quicker to make them more available in this pandemic. I don't think so, as these medications won't have ANY clinical trials for safety or efficacy against this specific virus, and clinical trials will still need to be done. If they are looking for affordable and effective solutions, then why not look at natural substances like vitamin and mineral supplements, which have been proven to be safe and effective against all other viruses including other coronavirus types? But that won't make them any profits though. Details of this alliance can be read here: https://www.businessinsider.com.au/bill-gates-mark-zuckerberg-find-covid-19-treatment-coronavirus-pandemic-2020-3?r=US&IR=T
In 2018, Bill Gates funded a US-based satellite company and together with a Japanese software company were planning to launch a $1bn network of satellites to provide "live and unfiltered" coverage of the earth. Another backer of the project said. "our objective is simple, we want to connect you visually with Earth in real-time". Services on the satellites will be able to track people and transport as it happens, watching weather systems and migrations. The tracking of people is a particularly interesting use of this technology, when you take into account the other factors listed here. Details of this project can be read here: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/04/19/bill-gates-backs-1bn-plan-cover-earth-video-surveillance-satellites/?fbclid=IwAR0_-X58VmBURKOEHevga-1cS9eM4vqVfOvzYrZS2K18m5C4wI6Cpzj6RME and here: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/25/bill-gates-backed-earthnow-will-provide-real-time-video-of-planet.html

Each point above perhaps isn't so suspicious on its own, but taken together as a whole it reeks of conflicts of interest, influence over the UN and WHO and world governments, and wanting to exert his beliefs of reducing the population, mandatory vaccinations with digital proof, and monitoring and tracking of the world's population. The timing of all of the above points is significant, with all taking place since November 2019. Everything is linked for one purpose - to create a pandemic and then benefit in every possible way from it. As the saying goes, "follow the money trail", to find out who really benefits from any situation. The money trail seems to be end up at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation at every single step in this pandemic.

This is why I believe something truly stinks about the entire coronavirus situation - it's pretty clear that it is man-made, and extremely suspicious (or convenient?) that the epicentre of the outbreak was in Wuhan, China, which has a BSL-4 biowarfare lab where scientists have been developing coronavirus strains and publishing studies on this work. We could not ever believe the communist Chinese government and their "official" coronavirus statistics on incidences and mortality rates, but now that the virus is spreading around the world, we might see some slightly more realistic statistics. But can we really believe any statistics, as per my previous article on this topic?

It is also very suspicious that the man who has been warning about a viral pandemic for years is the very same person who believes that population control is needed, whose Foundation funds biotechnology research companies (who manipulate dangerous pathogens to make them more virulent), funds pharmaceutical companies, funds a company which is currently already testing a miraculously fast-tracked coronavirus vaccine, funds technology projects for tracking the global population, and who also has a huge influence with the WHO. This is a huge conflict of interest through his Foundation's massive sponsorships at every step of the way in this crisis. His pre-emptive decision to call the outbreak as a pandemic ahead of the WHO decision, was premature and way out of line, but the WHO did announce the pandemic a short time afterwards. Keep en eye on which company or companies are approved for the coronavirus vaccines - will they coincidentally be funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation? Bill Gates admits that he is a big fan of vaccines, but has also said vaccines can be used to reduce the world's population by 10-15%. Yet he wants to SAVE everyone with a coronavirus vaccine?! Is he doing all of this for altruistic humanitarian purposes? Or is he is a business-man with a dangerous and selfish agenda?

The Gates Foundation appear to have their fingers in every single pie linked to this outbreak, and their involvement in everything here is highly suspicious at best. The Gates Foundation are trying to be the apparent knight in shining armour who will deliver alleged treatments and a miracle vaccine. At the very least, the Gates Foundation has a huge conflict of interest, but the above information also suggests to me that the Foundation is involved a lot more in this entire operation and for their own benefit.

There are too many coincidences here, and too many things having been planned and developed, just at the right time, for the COVID-19 pandemic to be anything other an a planned project.

If you put all of the above facts together, you get a fairly good picture of the intended outcome of this pandemic, and a possible look at a future with mandated vaccines, digital certificates of vaccination status, restricted movements based on vaccination status, constant monitoring and tracking of your movements, limiting informed consent, and more totalitarian measures that I dread to think about.

I'm not buying into the fear that the coronavirus will cause the predicted number of deaths that the Event 201 participants suggested. That was based on assumptions and estimates and computer modelling. I know that the virus can be defeated - that's what your immune system is for! It knows how to deal with any known or unknown infection, hence all the more reason you need to support your immune system to do its job and protect you! As there is currently no vaccine for this infection, there is no other option for you, other then to rely on your immune system! This is how humans as a species have survived for millenia without vaccines! Over 98% of people ARE surviving this infection, because of their immune systems! See my other articles on this topic for more information.

There are many more daily deaths from many other infections such as influenza, tuberculosis, malaria and AIDS, or from modern chronic health conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer, or simply from hunger in developing countries. Yet the media scare campaigns on this topic is disproportionate, while health departments simply say to "wash your hands" and "stay away from others", your governments tighten up laws to restrict your rights and freedoms, and social media platforms censor the truth even more.

Is Bill Gates the most unqualified, but most powerful and dangerous doctor in the world? Or is he incredibly psychic in being able to predict the pandemic and have all of his investments in place at the right time - being in the weeks before the event occurred?

See my other articles for more information on protecting yourself and your family from this rapidly-spreading infection. Washing your hands isn't going to be enough to prevent this infection. And there's more you need to do to treat it, other than isolation and staying at home.

Stay Healthy!

NB - a downloadable PDF file of this article is available below! Feel free to save and share this as desired.

coronavirus_links_to_bill_gates_exposed.pdf
File Size:	521 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

38 Comments

ABS data shows 75% drop in birth rates since COVID-19 vaccines being approved and recommended for pregnant women

New study finds no benefit from wearing masks for preventing coronavirus infection, but they cause many issues

a one world diet attempts to save the planet and feed the world but will cause more nutrient deficiencies and disease

Australia's TGA bans doctors from telling you which COVID-19 vaccine you will get

This is not a real pandemic (Part 2)

Body autonomy rights - your body your decision your health

The coronavirus is a killer, of human rights

The COVID-19 vaccine won't be mandatory, but illegal coercion will be used to try and make you get it

Australian government says COVID vaccine will be mandatory

A brief history of the COVID-19 saga, what might be yet to come, and recommendations to prevent this happening again

a new digital passport is needed to return to life after the coronavirus

Proof that the coronavirus is a man-made, genetically-modified virus, and not the result of a natural mutation

The most dangerous and unqualified doctor in the world is Bill Gates

COPYRIGHT

Archives

Categories