PH: 0417 632 464
Ross Walter Nutritionist & Naturopath
  • About
  • Contact
  • Treatments
  • Seminars
  • Programs
  • Articles
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Partners
  • Mentoring
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • Pathology
  • Bookings

ABS data shows 75% drop in birth rates since COVID-19 vaccines being approved and recommended for pregnant women

14/11/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
One of the most controversial and tragic in all of the events over the past 3 years, despite assurances of the so-called health experts and government officials, is the effects of the "CV-19 carrot" (the so-called "prevention/treatment") on pregnant women and foetuses.

In 2021 I reported on a CDC-funded study which showed an extremely high rate of miscarriages and stillbirths in pregnant women who had the mRNA shots, at approximately 82% (Shimabukuro et al., 2021). But the authors of the study ignored the data and still claimed the carrots were perfectly safe! An independent study reviewed their data some months later and reported issues with their data and explicitly concluded an 82-92% pregnancy loss that was ignored in the original study (Brock & Thornley, 2021). This finding was dismissed by the mRNA carrot manufacturers, and medical professionals, and any posts warning people on this (including mine) were fact-checked as "false" by the social media platforms, and anyone posting such information were censored and thrown in FB jail.

Given a bit more time and the truth always comes out, or becomes harder to hide...

The most current statistics of birth rates from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), shows the tragic results of the mRNA carrots that were mandated/forced/coerced to pregnant women, despite no safety testing every being done, as pregnant women are not allowed to be used in medical trials.

Australias's birth rates have been steadily increasing from 18,000-20,000 in 1975 to approximately 22,000-25,000 in 2019-2020. Until the mRNA carrots were introduced in February 2021... (ABS, 2022).

Since May 2021, being 3 months from the start of the carrot program, the birth rates have dropped EVERY MONTH from 25,669 to just over 23,000 in October 2021... to just over 18,000 in November 2021, the lowest since well before 1975...

To just 6,659 in December 2021.

That's an approximately 75% DROP in birth rates in 6 months, or in just 10 months since the carrots were introduced, which is coincidentally the same as the duration of a human pregnancy at approximately 40 weeks or 10 months.

The data is not just about the drop in birth rates, but the approximate 20,000 babies who died from the the effects of the mRNA carrots injected during pregnancy.

The 2022 ABS data has not yet been released.

I heard of so many anecdotal stories of mothers losing their babies in pregnancy, from spontaneous abortions and miscarriages in 2021 and 2022. But some people believe that anecdotal evidence bears no scientific merit, but anecdotal evidence is ALWAYS seen first, before published studies. In new situations, anecdotal evidence MUST always be seen as the highest form of scientific evidence.

So it appears that the abovementioned 2 studies on the dangers of the carrots in pregnant women were tragically right. The heads of some companies, health officials, employers and others responsible, need to be held accountable for this, with compensation for the women affected, fines for the companies and directors, and perhaps even jail time for health officials who said the carrots were "safe and effective".
 
Stay healthy.
 

References:

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2022). Births, by year and month of occurrence, by state. Retrieved 14th November 2022 from https://explore.data.abs.gov.au/vis?tm=births&pg=0&df[ds]=ABS_ABS_TOPICS&df[id]=BIRTHS_MONTH_OCCURRENCE&df[ag]=ABS&df[vs]=1.0.0&hc[Measure]=Births&pd=1975%2C&dq=1..AUS.A&ly[cl]=TIME_PERIOD&ly[rw]=MONTH_OCCUR&fbclid=IwAR1TND3_bpZfe84RWBXD6BNqZfliOUlQzIQUtWUQWT9tbuVD_1chAHOwCGM

Brock, A.R., & Thornley. S. (2021). Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy. Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law, 4. 130–143

Shimabukuro, T.T., Kim, S.Y., Myers, T.R., Moro, P.L., Oduyebo, T., Panagiotakopoulos, L., Marquez, P.L., Olson, C.K., Liu,  R., Chang, K.T., Ellington, S.R., Burkel, V.K., Smoots, A.N., Green,  C.J., Licata, C., Zhang, B.C., Alimchandani, M., Mba-Jonas, A., Martin, S.W., Gee, K.M., & Meaney-Delman, D.M. (2021). Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons, New England Journal of Medicine, 384 (24), 2273–2282. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983

0 Comments

Renowned Cardiologist calls it a pandemic of misinformation

30/9/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Hindsight is always amazing... When you look back at decisions or choices made and reflect on whether that was the right thing to do, or did it work, or were there in fact issues that could be corrected or avoided for next time.

Dr Aseem Malhotra is an experienced and renowned heart surgeon and Cardiologist in London, UK. In a very recent interview to promote his two new published studies, he reflected on what has happened with regard to the COVID-19 vaccine program and was there a cost-benefit outcome from this worldwide clinical trial on (almost) every man, woman and child? His two studies may be seen as controversially titled, but I think is very fair and accurate - entitled "Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine", parts 1 and 2 (Malhotra, 2022a; Malhotra, 2022b).

In the interview about these 2 new studies (Youtube, 2022), Dr Malhotra said he was very pro-vaccine, and got the two Pfizer shots early in their promotion, and he was even on TV shows promoting and recommending people to get them, and even attacking those who had "vaccine hesitancy" (those who didn't want to get the shots because of their lack of testing and having major risks). He said he got the shots and was promoting them as he said "I didn't conceive even the possibility, even though he had some scepticism of the benefit, I didn't think it would cause any significant harm at all". He then said that information changed and evolved, and he started looking at the data on the benefits vs side effects of the COVID-19 shots more critically because his father suffered a sudden heart attack and passed away in July 2021 and his post-mortem findings didn't make sense to him, with critical heart issues showing, despite being fit and healthy and having no family history of heart disease. His father's health and lifestyle, he said, was much better in recent years after getting a coronary calcium score test and other good test results.

Dr Malhotra then started seeing more information on the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) showing that they cause coronary inflammation and increase heart attack risk, and huge 25% increase in heart attacks in 16-39 year olds which was explicitly linked to the mRNA vaccines and not to the COVID-19 infection as such. And the icing on the cake with clear potential harms of these vaccines, which isn't being discussed, based in a published study in the Vaccine journal, re-evaluating the original randomised controlled data from the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials, of the data which lead to their being approved for use, showing that someone is more likely to suffer a SERIOUS adverse event (such as a life-changing disability, hospitalisation etc) from the mRNA vaccines at a rate of one in 800 vaccines given. The risk of a serious vaccine reaction was higher than the risk of being hospitalised from the COVID-19 infection. Other studies of real-world data shows similar rates confirming the side effect risks of the mRNA vaccines is higher than being hospitalised from COVID-19, with Norway data showing a risk of one in 926 vaccines. This data is still based on the official REPORTED cases to government adverse events databases. The risk of the most vulnerable group, being the over-80s being hospitalised from COVID-19 is just one in 7000. True numbers of mRNA vaccine side effects are likely to be MUCH higher, with 90+% of adverse events not being reported at all.

Based on this data and his findings, Dr Malhotra recommends that the mRNA vaccines must be stopped while further investigations are done.

Another issue that Dr Malhotra has about the COVID-19 vaccine program is the right of "informed consent", being that people have an absolute right to decide for themselves on their health choices and their body, being based on good quality "evidence" from studies and data and "health officials" giving people that good quality information as risks vs benefits of the shots.

The second part of the two studies that Dr Malhotra has just published is about looking at "how we got it wrong, why we got it wrong, and what are the solutions moving forward". He has previously on three occasions called for public enquiries into excess deaths from prescribed medications, as deaths from doctors prescribing drugs is the THIRD most common cause of death behind heart disease and cancer.

Dr Malhotra says one of the biggest problems in health and medicine is "big pharma", referring to the major pharmaceutical companies with their "unchecked power", and "who function in ways which are anti-human, and they are profit-making machines, and they function like a psychopath, and have a history of deceiving people for profit and causing unnecessary harm".

Moving forward he says we need to:
  1. Make sure that the medicines regulator isn't funded by the pharmaceutical industry, as the UK, US and Australian regulators certainly are, and in many other countries too
  2. Disassociate medical education from pharmaceutical company sponsorship
  3. Have independent testing of pharmaceutical drugs, and not relying on the pharma companies to do this (and manipulate their data).

Dr Malhotra agreed with the interviewer that the lack of any evidence of the COVID-19 vaccines preventing transmission made the vaccine mandates were absurd, unethical and criminal. He said that instead, the focus should have been on open discussions of the risks vs benefits and helping the most vulnerable, which would have likely given better outcomes with less harm, rather than the vaccines causing more harm than good in most people. The only benefit of the vaccine mandates was to the profit line of the pharma companies, despite the "extremely poor efficacy and unprecedented harm" they caused, and they are not interested in your health. He said we have to rebuild (the medical and health system) and move forward, by fixing the problems with "root cause analysis". All problems can be truly fixed by finding and fixing the root causes of the problem, not just symptom relief. He said even Doctors do not realise that the government medical regulators are part of the problem, with no independent testing being done on vaccines or medications.

His words of "root cause analysis" caught my attention, as this is what I do! I've known for a long time that this is what is needed to resolve health issues, but this is not the medical way that only "manages" the symptoms by hiding them with medications designed to suppress them, or surgeries to remove the symptom, but never to find and fix the causes. Because there was no training in root cause analysis in our education, and the same for Doctors, I've had to invent a process to help find all the root causes in each person. This helps me greatly with each client, and helps them to get better much more quickly and for long-term resolution of all symptoms and conditions.

Are we going heading toward oblivion, or should we start changing track to Utopia? His words.

Please see his full interview (12 minutes long) in this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Spau8UwRwZs

Stay healthy!
 
References:

Malhotra, A. (2022a). Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1. Journal of Insulin Resistance, 5 (1), a71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jir.v5i1.71

Malhotra, A. (2022b). Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 2. Journal of Insulin Resistance, 5 (1), a72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jir.v5i1.72


Youtube. (2022). Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Short Sharp Chat on his Vaccine Cost Benefit Paper! Retrieved 30th September 2022 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Spau8UwRwZs
0 Comments

Authorities censor and silence scientists who publish study finding issues with COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women

28/3/2022

1 Comment

 
Picture
I wrote an article based on 2 published studies relating to the alleged safety (or otherwise) of the CV-19 vaxes being given to pregnant women:
  1. The first study was poorly designed, with a bad methodology, and the authors found issues with the mRNA shots causing spontaneous abortions and miscarriages which was clear in the data, and yet they concluded that there were NO issues of safety in pregnant women.
  2. The second study repeated the first study by reviewing the same data, and was more explicit in its findings, and concluded that the original study was badly designed, the original authors misinterpreted their data, and ignored the 82-92% pregnancy loss when the mRNA shots were given in trimestes 1 or 2, or 12.9% in trimester 3.
Obviously with these findings being truly tragic, I had to make them more known, and to prevent others from having the same outcomes.

The authors of the original study initially got a lot of positive publicity as it was what the authorities wanted to hear, but later turned into negative publicity because of their poor study and their deliberate hiding of the facts, and their study conclusion which was a lie - but then the fact-checking began.

But instead the authors of the second study got even more negative response, but only because their findings went against the "scientific" vax agenda. The authors who work as professors at a NZ university, were demanded to retract their review of the original study by their employer... no doubt a threat of their job was made, which is all too familiar at the moment. Not because of a poor study, but because of WHAT they said in it, despite the data being there as clear as day, and their study being peer-reviewed and approved for publishing in a major medical journal...
​
Sadly this is an all too familiar situation, and another very poor reflection of "science" at the moment:
  • That the purpose of science is to question everything, especially the popular opinion of the day, to test whether the current believe is actually true, or to come up with new truths.
  • Just because a study is published doesn't mean that it is actually true... Sadly the scientific community are not immune to corruption, bias, poor methodologies, corporate funding in return for favourable study outcomes, hoax studies being published, misinterpretation of data, manipulation of data, rubber stamp peer reviews (or none at all) and many other issues
  • I've yet to see any any real quality science being used, recommended or mentioned by the authoprities in almost 2 years of this pandemic circus
  • Many proven preventions or treatments (from quality studies) have been ignored, suppressed or banned by the authorities when these could have improved health and prevented cases and deaths
  • There is good quality science and bad quality science too
  • Social media "fact-checkers" are being paid by their relevant platforms to follow the government and medical agenda, and to discredit, censor and remove any posts, memes or studies which question the agenda
  • Even good quality studies have been forcibly retracted or pulled, even after being peer-reviewed (for quality and acceptance of the data) because of outrage in the media or in medical circles, because the authors of the studies dared to question the accepted belief and published findings which showed that the current vax agenda has serious issues of concern or safety
  • Even when I fully reference my articles with the published studies or data, this still isn't good enough for FB and the "fact-checkers". Their opposing "science" doesn't negate mine...
Hence if we cannot question the current beliefs, then this is not science but propaganda, dogma or scientific censorship, and this needs to end. This current situation is about peoples' lives, not about playing politics, taking control of other people, or abusing or suppressing science for some agenda that they have... The people in authority who are pushing this anti-science or misinformation message (under the guise of it being "science") have blood on their hands and need to be stopped and dealt with accordingly.

Believe nothing. Question everything. Speak your truth. Stay healthy.

1 Comment

Shocking findings of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women

28/3/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
In April 2021 the CDC funded a published study which investigated the many reported cases of spontaneous abortions (ie, miscarriages) in pregnant women who had received the mRNA vaxes.

The study (Shimabukuro et al., 2021) investigated 35,691 data records of women from a vaccination database and the US VAERS adverse events database. Despite 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, and finding that the most frequently reported pregnancy event was spontaneous abortion (of 46 cases), the study was generally positive for the use of the CV-19 vaxes in pregnant women. Never mind that none of the manufacturers tested their vaxes on pregnant women in their clinical trials, as that is banned for safety and ethical reasons. The study concluded that "Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines." but that was not entirely accurate.

This study had a bad and biased design, and you needed to look into the details as they deliberately hid or did not report the very high pregnancy loss rate. Firstly, they loaded the study with dissimilar numbers of pregnant women in the 3 trimesters, with 700 included in T3, but 127 across T1 and T2. That is bad study design. The authors claim "miscarriage" numbers across all 3 trimesters, when medically this only occurs in T1 and T2 and only up to 20 weeks. After that is called a "stillbirth". The study explicitly states (in Table 4 of the referenced study) that 104 spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) occurred within 20 weeks of pregnancy, yet they included the 700 women who had the shot in the third trimester in this calculation - 104 losses / 827 births = 12.6% pregnancy loss. BUT the calculation should have been 104/127 births (losses vs births from vaccines given in the T1 and T2, as it's not clear how many vaccines were given just in the first 20 weeks). More accurately that means an 81.9% pregnancy loss. From the mRNA vaccines being given to pregnant women. 81.9%.

To make things worse for CV-19 vaccines in pregnancy, the same Table 4 states: "A total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred BEFORE 13 WEEKS of gestation". That is all within Trimester 1 plus 1 week. Yet this major detail was just a side note to one of the tables, and completely contradicted the study's conclusions but was not mentioned again in the rest of the paper.

A new study has been published (Brock & Thornley, 2021) which reviews the data and conclusions of the original Shimabukuro study. The authors of this new study confirm the statistical errors and that the true incidences of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women who had the mRNA shots was 82% (within 20 weeks of start of pregnancy) to 92.3% (within 13 weeks). 7-8 times higher than the original study found. A truly shocking and tragic finding. This study found many other faults or missing data, such as not reporting on which mRNA shot was used) or not reporting pregnancy losses between the first and second shots, and other incorrect interpretations or omissions of the data.

​This new study also investigated the use of Pfizer's own clinical trials of their mRNA vaxes on pregnant rats, which claimed no pregnancy losses. But the authors of this study reviewed their data to again find poor study design or incorrect interpretations of their data, which in fact did show increased losses and many types of foetal abnormalities (birth defects).

The study also said there are other causes of concern of getting the mRNA vaxes in pregnancy or breastfeeding, from other studies and VAERS records, including skin rashes caused from clotting issues (TTP), gastrointestinal upsets, anaphylactic reactions, and deaths in babies from exposure to breastmilk in a recently vaccinated mother. Other issues of concern include production of auto-antibodies, indicating the development of autoimmune conditions (found in all pregnant women in one study), destruction of red blood cells, elevated liver enzymes (indicating liver damage), low platelet count (causing poor clotting and blood loss), reduced placenta development, impaired male fertility, and more.

This info shows that you cannot just read the title, the abstract or even just the conclusions of studies, as little details are hidden that they sometimes don't want you to see... The Shimabukuro study concluded that it was safe for CV-19 vaxes in pregnancy and said they found no adverse issues, which was clearly incorrect from their poor study design, incorrect interpretations and likely deliberate hiding of their findings. Newer studies show some major issues of these new vaxes in pregnancy or breastfeeding, including up to 92% pregnancy loss. Recommending the mRNA vaxes in pregnant and breastfeeding women is criminal and immoral, and recommendations for these vaxes in pregnancy must be stopped. The study authors recommend withdrawal of the mRNA vaxes in pregnancy and breastfeeding, as well as in children, until better and long-term safety studies are available in these groups.

Stay healthy.
 
References:
Brock, A.R., & Thornley. S. (2021). Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy. Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law, 4. 130–143
 
Shimabukuro, T.T., Kim, S.Y., Myers, T.R., Moro, P.L., Oduyebo, T., Panagiotakopoulos, L., Marquez, P.L., Olson, C.K., Liu,  R., Chang, K.T., Ellington, S.R., Burkel, V.K., Smoots, A.N., Green,  C.J., Licata, C., Zhang, B.C., Alimchandani, M., Mba-Jonas, A., Martin, S.W., Gee, K.M., & Meaney-Delman, D.M. (2021). Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons, New England Journal of Medicine, 384 (24), 2273–2282. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983

0 Comments

Authorities find links to AZ vaccine causing blood clots and platelet issues, and increased risks of these in women

10/4/2021

2 Comments

 
Picture
More and more incidences of post-COVID-19 vaccine side effects are being reported in international adverse events databases, particularly of blood clotting issues, but many other issues, including deaths...
​
The authorities keep saying that there is no link to the vaccine, until very recently (9th April 2021) with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) reporting links between the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and the blood clots and low platelet counts in many people who have had this vaccine (TGA, 2021). These findings fully justify the concerns that many countries (approximately 25) who have either banned, suspended or restricted the use of the AZ vaccine. Perhaps, based on the new findings and new research, the restrictions should be expanded or even having the AZ vaccine completely banned, to protect everyone from this and other side effects - which are much higher than the other COVID-19 vaccines.

The TGA also notes that while any specific links to gender are not known, but there have been many more adverse clotting events in women than men. This is a concern as there are more female health-care workers (TGA, 2021).

The Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) has recently (8th April 2021) changed its recommendation for the AZ vaccine to be used in adults under 50 years of age, because of the increasing risks of clotting issues in older adults.

The TGA recommends reporting any side effects from the AZ or other vaccines to your country's adverse events database, so these issues can be monitored and investigated. If you know of anyone who has any side effects from any of the COVID-19 vaccines, make sure they report the issues to their country's adverse events register.

References:

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021). AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 vaccine: Updated safety advisory – rare and unusual blood clotting syndrome (thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia). Retrieved 9th April 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/astrazeneca-chadox1-s-covid-19-vaccine
​
2 Comments

Astra-Zeneca vaccine banned or suspended from many countries due to safety concerns and severe adverse reactions

16/3/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
More countries are suspending the AstraZeneca (AZ) COVID-19 vaccine due to serious adverse reactions. It has just been announced that Denmark, Norway and Iceland have suspended the rollout of the AZ vaccine due to many cases of blood clots occurring in patients after their vaccine (BBC News, 2021). While there is no proof yet of how the vaccine causes this, it is a known side effect of this vaccine.
​
Some people have even died after developing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) after receiving a dose of the AZ vaccine (BBC News, 2021). The UK's adverse events database also shows over 41 cases of strokes caused by blood clots, with 6 of them being fatal, after receiving the AZ vaccine. The same database shows another 13 cases of blood clots in the lungs, causing another death, and another 2 dozen cases of other types of blood clots also (UK Government, 2021b).

The AZ vaccine is also the one that Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt had on the weekend, and 2 days later he was in hospital with cellulitis, a serious and potentially life-threatening skin infection. Again, cellulitis is a known serious side effect of the AZ vaccine (see attached table, taken from the UK's adverse events register) (UK Government, 2021b).

Other countries have also banned or suspended the AZ vaccine due to safety concerns, now including Italy and Austria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Luxembourg (BBC News, 2021).
​
Previously, Switzerland banned the AZ vaccine due to safety concerns, and Germany banned it for similar reasons on being used for people over 65 years old.

None of this is entirely surprising really, as the AZ vaccine is causing over 60% more adverse reactions and deaths than the Pfizer vaccine, on a per dose comparison (UK Government, 2021a; UK Government, 2021b).

The media and health authorities have been quick to point out that there is "no evidence" of the COVID vaccines causing these adverse events. But, vaccines are the leading cause of coincidences!

Stay healthy!


References:

BBC News. (2021). Oxford-AstraZeneca: EU says 'no indication' vaccine linked to clots. Retrieved 12th March 2021 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56357760

UK Government. (2021a). COVID-19 mRNA PfizerBioNTech vaccine analysis print. Retrieved 9th February 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/.../COVID-19...

UK Government. (2021b). COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print. Retrieved 12th March 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/.../COVID-19...
0 Comments

COVID-19 vaccinations started in Australia

27/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
So the COVID vaccinations started here in Australia this week...
 
I have tried over the past 12 months to show you that there are many factors which can lead to an increased risk of this infection, and what you can do about preventing and treating it. The main risk factor is a low functioning immune system, which is the result of many possible factors too. I've been saying all along - improve your immune system function to prevent the coronavirus infection and also reduce any risks of complications and to reduce severity.
 
If you aren't at least a little bit suspicious of the goings-on over the past 12 months, then there's not a lot more that I can do to help you! Let's just review some important questions and answers about the new COVID vaccines:
 
Will getting the COVID shot be safe? NO! (thousands have died from the vaccine, especially in the elderly and other age groups that have no mortality from the virus itself)
Will getting the COVID shot get rid of the virus? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot reduce COVID incidence rates? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot improve the herd immunity rate? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot improve your immune system? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot stop you from getting the coronavirus infection? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot stop you from passing it onto others? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot stop you from dying? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot remove the need to wear a mask? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot remove the need to social distance? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot remove the need for lockdowns? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot get rid of the need to use QR codes to check in everywhere? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot reduce business closures (or enable businesses to open again)? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot get rid of the travel bans? NO!
Will getting the COVID shot improve the survival rate from COVID of 99.9%? NO!
 
If you are still keen on the vaccine after reading this (and my many other articles) then all I can say is "Good luck!". Ideally you should undertake a preparation period before this (or any) vaccine of at least 2 weeks to improve immune system function and detox pathways, and continue a post-vax protocol for about 4 weeks afterwards, to reduce any risks of complications. 
 
So why are we being told to put all our faith in these new and experimental vaccines, if nothing else will change? Because the pandemic is not about a virus, (which has a 99.9% survival rate of the very few who actually get it) but an excuse to implement social changes and total control and monitoring.
 
Why would you want to get this experimental (ie "untested to normal scientific standards") vacine when NOTHING will change after getting it? (Yes I really want to know!)
 
Stay healthy!

0 Comments

Coronavirus pandemic update on COVID-19 vaccines - Wk1 FEb 2021

8/2/2021

2 Comments

 
Picture
Here's a summary on the COVID-19 vaccine situation around the world...
​
The pharmaceutical giant Merck has abandoned its two COVID-19 vaccine trials, after studies showed very little effectiveness of their vaccine (Merck, 2021). The manufacturer, in their news release, said that the vaccines produced LESS immune responses than compared to a NATURAL infection, and less than other COVID-19 vaccines, leading to their decision to scrap their trials and vaccine production.

The Oxford University/Astra Zeneca vaccine is undergoing human trials in the UK. While most of the other COVID vaccine manufacturers saved a lot of time in vaccine development by skipping the typically-required animal testing, the Oxford vaccine has been doing animal trials anyway.

The Oxford vaccine animal trials found that ALL of the monkeys became infected with COVID-19 when challenged after the vaccination. There was no difference in the viral load or symptoms between the vaccinated group and the un-vaccinated group. The antibody levels produced from the vaccine was very low, hence the vaccine did not prevent animals catching the virus. The vaccine did NOT work (van Doremalen et al., 2020). More of a concern was that the study, by the Oxford scientists themselves, was that "viral shedding" of the coronavirus was NOT reduced in the vaccinated animals. This is proof that the Oxford vaccine actually "sheds" in mucus which can then infect other people to spread the genetically-modified virus - from the vaccine.

The scientists performing the animal trial suggested that if similar results were found in human trials, "the vaccine would be unlikely to reduce transmission in the wider community".

Animal trials often show problems with vaccines (or medications) well before they get to human trials. Many vaccines and medications never make it to human trial stage, because of poor efficacy or from causing too many problems (ie, side effects) in animals.

The lack of animal trials is a massive safety issue when very new vaccines or medications are being developed. Animal trials are also contentious and perceived as unethical or cruel, but then again so is trialling such new vaccines or medications in humans.

The Oxford/AZ vaccine was meant to be one of the major vaccines being offered, so much so that the Australian government bought a huge number of doses... well before trials had finished (ABC, 2020a).

Switzerland, however, has now banned (or "not authorised") the Oxford/AZ COVID vaccine because of a lack of evidence of effectiveness (Express, 2021). This was confirmed with the German vaccine committee research team finding that it is only 8% effective in those over 65 years of age, and therefore the Oxford/AZ vaccine will not be recommended to adults over 65 years in Germany (Tio, 2021; ABC, 2021b).

Pfizer has been having issues with their vaccine too... Pfizer applied for "emergency use authorisation" for its mRNA vaccine to be given in India, after the country's medicines regulator requested further information and a local trial to confirm the vaccine's safety and efficacy. Pfizer declined to undertake these further investigations into their vaccine and withdrew their application (CNBC, 2021).

The Centres of Disease Control (CDC) in the US on their own website report a published study that Israel had a surge in coronavirus incidences at the same time as the Pfizer vaccine was approved and being given to people. Many people working in healthcare in Israel developed COVID-19 from 1-10 days after vaccination. At the start of the Pfizer vaccine rollout, Israel have a COVID-19 positive test rate of 4.4% of the population (Times of Israel, 2020), but this nearly doubled to 7% of the population just over 1 month later as more people got the Pfizer vaccine (CDC, 2021; World of Meters, 2021). Clearly the Pfizer vaccine is NOT working! The Israeli study found that the Pfizer vaccine efficacy is only 52%, not their reported 95%! Hence they say that even immunised persons can still develop COVID-19.

Ironically, China are also developing their own vaccine. The Chinese COVID vaccine from CanSino Biologics showed 81% adverse events in their clinical trials, with 17% of them being classified as "serious" adverse reactions. This is a different type of vaccine, similar to the AZ/Oxford type and using a genetically-modified adenovirus type 5 virus (Corvelva, 2021). The very high amount of adverse events is very concerning.

That concludes the roundup of the world's COVID vaccine news. With not a lot being positive news (unless you count the various countries stopping some of the vaccines being used on their populations). There's no evidence yet of any slowing of COVID incidences or deaths from any country, despite many millions of vaccines being given. Will wait and see for more studies or statistics to come out... In the meantime, support your immune system!

Stay healthy!

References:

Amit, S., Beni, S.A., Biber, A., Grinberg, A., Leshem, E., & Regev-Yochay, G. (2021). Post-Vaccination COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers, Israel.
 
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2020a). Australia orders 84 million doses of coronavirus vaccine for massive free roll-out next year. Retrieved 7th February 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-06/free-coronavirus-vaccine-to-be-made-available-throughout-20212/12635174
 
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2020b). Germany questions efficacy of AstraZeneca vaccine in the elderly. Retrieved 7th February 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-29/germany-questions-efficacy-of-astrazeneca-vaccine-in-the-elderly/13101658
 
CNBC. (2021). Pfizer withdraws application for emergency use of its Covid-19 vaccine in India. Retrieved 7th February from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/05/pfizer-withdraws-application-for-emergency-use-of-its-covid-19-vaccine-in-india.html
 
Corvelva. (2021). Covid-19 vaccine: 81% of the clinical trial volunteers had reactions to the vaccine. Retrieved 7th February 2020 from https://www.corvelva.it/en/approfondimenti/notizie/covid19/vaccino-covid-19-l-81-dei-volontari-della-sperimentazione-clinica-ha-avuto-reazioni-al-vaccino.html

 
Express. (2021). Switzerland bans AstraZeneca vaccine for ALL citizens as Europe declares war on UK jab. Retrieved 5th February 2021 from https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1392962/eu-vaccine-latest-astrazeneca-switzerland-ban-oxford-vaccine-uk-latest
 
Merck. (2021). Merck Discontinues Development of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates; Continues Development of Two Investigational Therapeutic Candidates. Retrieved 3rd February 2021 from https://www.merck.com/news/merck-discontinues-development-of-sars-cov-2-covid-19-vaccine-candidates-continues-development-of-two-investigational-therapeutic-candidates/
 
Times of Israel. (2020). Daily virus cases surpassed 3,000 on Sunday, with 4.4% of tests positive. Retrieved 7th February 2020 from https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog-december-21-2020/
 
Tio. (2021). Dubbi sul vaccino di AstraZeneca: «Efficacia solo dell'8% sugli over 65». Retrieved 7th February from https://www.tio.ch/dal-mondo/attualita/1488779/vaccino-astrazeneca-dubbi-over-efficacia
 
van Doremalen, M., Lambe, T., Spencer, A., Belij-Rammerstorfer, S., Purushotham, J.N. Port, J.R., Avanzato, V., Bushmaker, T., Flaxman, A., Ulaszewska, M., Feldmann, F., Allen, E.R., Sharpe, H., Schulz, J., Holbrook, M., Okumura, A., Meade-White, K., Pérez-Pérez, L., Bissett, C., Gilbride, C., Williamson, B.N., Rosenke, R., Long, D., Ishwarbhai, A., Kailath, R., Rose, L., Morris, S., Powers, C., Lovaglio, J., Hanley, P.W., Scott, D., Saturday, G., de Wit,  E., Gilbert,  S.C., Munster, V.J. (2020). ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques, bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.13.093195
 
World of Meters. (2020) Coronavirus cases. Retrieved 6th February 2021 from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
 
2 Comments

Body autonomy rights - your body your decision your health

8/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Body autonomy is the right of every person to make their own decisions about their body without external influence or coercion.
​
Body Autonomy particularly relates to health and medical decisions, and is incredibly relevant today in this alleged mandatory vaccine environment.

The constitutions of many countries or laws of many states or countries support body autonomy, and especially so in Australia where our constitution specifically makes it illegal for any medical treatment to be mandated, forced or even coerced without voluntary choice based on full informed consent of the risks vs benefits.

Some politicians have stated that COVID vaccinations will be mandatory, and others have said that restrictions will be placed on those who choose not to take the vaccine. Such restrictions have said to include the ability to travel, work in government services, access government services and benefits, attending government buildings, being able to work in private companies, get healthcare, attend movies or even eat in restaurants or drink in bars.

I warned about "digital COVID passports" being developed in early 2020, and now many companies are jumping on board to develop this technology, to track and monitor everyone, everywhere. This coronavirus plandemic is just the excuse to bring in these new laws that ignore and trample all over your rights.

You cannot let politicians make illegal decisions like this that ignore the constitutions and laws of countries. You must stand up against this tyranny.

It's your body, your decision, your rights, and your health. And someone else's body is their decision too.
0 Comments

Far more people die from starvation than the coronavirus

8/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Over 4 million people in 2020 died from hunger (twice as many as COVID-19, but nothing being done about this), with around 9 million dying every year from a lack of food (Global Nutrition Report, 2015). There’s a vaxxine for starvation. It’s called food.

Ironically, improved nutrition is also the vaxxine against COVID-19, helping the immune system work better against this infection, as it does for any new infection that the body hasn't seen before.

The trillions of dollars spent on COVID-1984 could feed all humans for hundreds of years. Yet, millions of people are being thrown into abject poverty, hunger, malnutrition and destitution because of this pandemic BS. All to develop an unnecessary vaxxine which is injuring and killing more people than the virus truly is.

COVID-19 is a respiratory condition with a mortality rate of 0.01% - 0.03% of those who actually get sick from it. And only 0.3% of the total population who get tested are deemed as "positive", and many don't get any symptoms due to a high false positive rate. Hence the actual true mortality rate is very, very low. In Australia it is just 0.0003% of the population (World of Meters, 2021). Even that result is based on dodgy PCR testing and ridiculous death classifications.

What a pathetic joke.

Wake Up.
​

0 Comments

What is an mRNA vaccine, how does it work, and what are the issues with this new mRNA vaccine technology?

13/12/2020

1 Comment

 
Picture
One of the new vaccine delivery systems being used by some of the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer and Moderna), is the "messenger RNA" or mRNA type vaccines. But what are these, how do they work, are there any issues with these technologies?
 
Messenger RNA are produced naturally in your cells. mRNA is a single-stranded RNA molecule that is created in the nucleus based on a subset of your DNA, being a particular gene. The mRNA is basically a complementary copy of a specific gene which moves out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm of the cell (Brody, 2020). Within the cytoplasm of a cell are ribosomes, tiny organelles which can be found floating or attached to the Endoplasmic Reticulum, both being protein-making factories to make a type of protein, being copies of the mRNA or gene, for use in the body (British Society for Cell Biology, 2020; Moderna, 2020).
 
mRNA vaccines are a new technology that tries to simulate a coronavirus infection, without actually having an infection, to train the immune system cells (the white blood cells) to recognise a coronavirus infection in the in the future and to respond more quickly to the infection. The mRNA in the vaccine is injected into the body, somehow gets into cells, which trains the cells to produce a piece of protein which matches the "spike protein" on the surface of the coronavirus, which the cells release and this stimulates an immune system response and trains the immune system to recognise and destroy the virus in a future infection (Pfizer, 2020). Allegedly.
 
The mRNA vaccines may be seen as having some advantages over other types of vaccines, which typically contain a dead form of the virus or bacteria, or a live (but weakened) form of pathogens. In many cases, as has been shown in many published studies, the live viruses in vaccines can become re-activated to cause the actual infection to which you are supposedly being "immunised" against. The mRNA vaccines do not actually contain the coronavirus, but a portion of the "spike protein", there is a very low risk of actually contracting COVID-19 from the vaccine (European Commission Research and Innovation, 2020).
 
mRNA vaccines are a very new development and not used or approved for use in vaccines before. Hence their testing for safety and efficacy MUST be done thoroughly and properly, and not rushed or fast-tracked because of some perceived emergency. The USA has an "Emergency Use Authorisation" or EUA which allows medical devices, which includes vaccines, to be fast-tracked (ie, where testing requirements are reduced) to speed up the development and delivery of such devices where there is no other option for treatment (FDA, 2020). But there is another option, it's called "your immune system"!
 
One possible reason why we have seen so much opposition to the drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) being recommended for its antiviral effects by governments and health departments or organisations or medicine regulators, is that if HCQ was recommended officially by the authorities, it would negate and stop the EUA requirements for any fast-tracked vaccine for COVID-19! In such a scenario, the COVID vaccine manufacturers would have to stick to the full and proper testing protocol for their products, which would take on average 7 years or more to complete in order to test, apply for approval and then produce their products. In our current COVID situation we have seen vaccine manufacturers skip standard testing processes, use unscientific testing protocols, announce a fraudulently-derived effectiveness percentage of their products, and PRODUCE tens of millions of vaccine doses, while they are still testing their product, with the regulator approval seeming to be a mere rubber stamp formality without the usual thorough investigations or analyses done to confirm the safety and effectiveness before being approved for public use.
 
The mRNA vaccines will not prevent COVID-19 infections. They MAY (or may not) prime your immune system to more quickly recognise a future pathogen displaying the same coronavirus spike proteins and this MAY (or may not) result in the production of antibodies. In some published studies, having a level of antibodies does not mean that you are "immune" to that infection! Multiple doses of the mRNA vaccines are needed, as the first dose does not always cause production of antibodies, leading to an initial low efficacy rate.
 
The mRNA vaccines will not prevent the transmission of the virus to others. It takes time (approximately 2 weeks) from the start of an infection for the immune system to ramp up its production of white blood cells to fight the infection. During this time, you can be infecting other people around you.
 
The mRNA vaccines will not stop an active COVID-19 infection in someone.
 
I still have some questions about the mRNA vaccines which need investigating and answering, because I am far from satisfied with the (lack of) thorough testing being done on these new vaccines:
 
1) How do the mRNA molecules in the vaccine get INTO a cell to produce the coronavirus spike proteins, when the mRMA molecules are normally only RELEASED from a cell?
2) For how long will a cell continue to make and release the COVID mRNA to stimulate the immune system?
3) How many cells are likely to become COVID mRNA protein producing factories, and how much mRNA will be produced by these "infected" cells?
4) Will the immune system see your cells with the COVID mRNA in them as being "infected" and destroy them, thus effectively stopping the vaccine from working?
5) What is the true "seroconversion" rate (the % of people who develop antibodies) after each vaccine dose for different age groups?
6) How long will the "immunity" from the COVID-19 vaccines last?
7) What is the true effectiveness rate of these mRNA vaccines in preventing COVID-19 infections?
8) What are the long-term potential adverse effects of these mRNA vaccines? (No-one knows as they are very new, and there have been NO long-term trials done).
 
We don't know the answer to ANY of these questions, which we really should know, especially for this new vaccine technology.
 
mRNA vaccines have been experimented with before, but none have been successful. Using mRNA vaccines in animal trials have suggested that the technique wasn't as safe as hoped (Chemical and Engineering News, 2018).
 
Contrary to many social media posts and memes, mRNA vaccines do not change your DNA! mRNA does not need to nor can enter the nucleus of the cell to change your DNA or your genes. mRNA is only used by cells outside of the nucleus... It is important to make sure that in any scientific debate or opposition to this new vaccine technology that both sides have their facts correct.
 
Despite the fact that mRNA vaccines cannot change your DNA, there are still MANY concerns for these new vaccines, and many questions still need to be asked and answered. MUCH more scientific testing must be done over a longer period, to truly show their safety and efficacy. And whenever there is a risk of side effects, especially in something new like this, and more so when the infection is not serious in 99.99% of the population (who quickly recover), there MUST be a choice for getting this vaccine or not.
 

 
References:
 
British Society for Cell Biology (2020). Ribosome. Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://bscb.org/learning-resources/softcell-e-learning/ribosome/
 
Brody, L.C. (2020). Messenger RNA (mRNA). Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/messenger-rna
 
Chemical and Engineering News. (2018). Can mRNA disrupt the drug industry? Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://cen.acs.org/business/start-ups/mRNA-disrupt-drug-industry/96/i35
 
European Commission Research and Innovation. (2020). Five things you need to know about: mRNA vaccines. Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://horizon-magazine.eu/article/five-things-you-need-know-about-mrna-vaccines.html
 
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2020). Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs). Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization
 
Moderna. (2020). The Science and Fundamentals of mRNA Technology. Retrieved 8th December 2020 from https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/science-and-fundamentals-mrna-technology

1 Comment

December 04th, 2020

4/12/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
Several of the major pharmaceutical companies who are close to finishing their clinical trials of their COVID-19 vaccines have announced some very impressive results of their effectiveness, at around 95%.

Considering that no vaccine in history has come close to being 95% effective in allegedly preventing an infection, and many vaccines have never been able to be produced despite huge budgets and years of trying (such as the common cold virus, HIV, and the SARS and MERS coronavirus vaccines) how are these companies getting such results just in a few months after the outbreak? Let's look into this in more detail...

Some of the major pharmaceutical companies close to finishing their trials and producing COVID vaccines include AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna. I'll look into each of them in turn.

AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca have been running multiple trials together with Oxford University, in the UK, USA, India, Brazil, Japan, and South Africa (AstraZeneca, 2020).

AstraZeneca are being very secretive about the details of their clinical trials and their results, and not releasing the data which allegedly shows positive results (The Guardian, 2020b). After some of their competitors released their trial protocols, AstraZeneca finally released their trial protocol, but not their data. They aim to develop a vaccine with 50% effectiveness (being the FDA requirement for vaccine approval) (Becker's Hospital Review, 2020).

AstraZeneca are creating a genetically-modified vaccine using a defective modified chimpanzee adenovirus with the coronavirus spike protein. The vaccine attempts to stimulate an immune response to the coronavirus spike protein, so that the immune system will recognise the spike protein in a future infection (AstraZeneca, 2020).

Pfizer
Pfizer are developing a new "messenger RNA" (mRNA) vaccine, which does not actually contain the COVID-19 virus. Instead, the mRNA vaccine trains cells to produce a piece of protein which matches the "spike protein" on the surface of the coronavirus, which the cells release and this stimulates an immune response and trains the immune system to recognise and destroy the virus (Pfizer, 2020). Allegedly.

Pfizer is testing their mRNA vaccine on 44,000 volunteers. They reported 170 COVID-19 cases in the volunteers, with 162 in the placebo group and 8 in the vaccine group.

They get their 95% effectiveness by comparing the COVID cases between the placebo group against the vaccine group, as (8/162) * 100% = 4.9% or rounded up to 5% COVID cases in the vaccinated group compared to 95% in the non-vaccinated group. Therefore, they say their vaccine is 95% effective!

Moderna
Moderna are producing a very different mRNA based vaccine, and currently testing on 30,000 volunteers. In this trial, 95 people still contracted COVID-19, with 90 of them in the placebo group and 5 in the vaccine group.

Moderna claim their 95% vaccine effectiveness using the same method as Pfizer: (5/90) * 100% = 5.5%, hence 94.5% effectiveness or rounded up to 95%.


The COIVID vaccine clinical trials are supposed to be about:

1) Testing for efficacy (ie, effectiveness) of the vaccine to PREVENT infections, to prime the immune system and produce ANTIBODIES against the infection, to prevent TRANSMISSION of the infection, and prevent DEATHS!
2) Testing for safety, to make sure that those receiving the vaccine do not get any serious adverse effects (or ANY adverse effects, which is actually impossible), and that the vaccine is not worse than the actual infection in the short term or in the long term.

But none of the major clinical trials of the COVID-19 vaccines have been designed to record or test for these 2 critical elements of safety or efficacy! None of the current vaccine trials have been setup to detect that the vaccine will result in a reduction of infections, a reduction of symptoms, the production of antibodies, a reduction of serious outcomes such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths, or a reduction in transmissions (Doshi, 2020). Then what the hell are they actually testing?! It seems they are "testing" NOTHING at all. Other than perhaps some basic maths, which they have no real evidence for...

The vaccine companies are in fact just committing FRAUD, to deceive the regulators, the media, politicians, doctors, and YOU, for their personal financial gain. The "testing" of their vaccines is simply a race to the finish line - to be the first to be able to mass-produce billions of vaccines, while fudging the paperwork to make it look like it works, when it doesn't. As shown above, they aren't even testing their vaccines properly.

And the vaccine companies are committing FRAUD by skipping over the usual test phases (ie, animal trials, which have typically found a lot of problems in past vaccines) as well as ignoring proper safety and efficacy outcomes that they are supposed to be testing for (British Medical Journal, 2020).

They also have no idea of the long-term implications of the COVID vaccines in 3 or 6 or 12 months, or years after vaccination, as no long-term testing will be done before being released to the public. The manufacturers are also not looking at testing specific age groups - for children who have had next to no effects or deaths from the virus, or the elderly with their reduced immune response to all other vaccines, or pregnant women, or those with comorbid conditions. There will be no testing done on these factors, and people in these groups have actually been excluded from the vaccine trials (Doshi, 2020). See the attached table showing all these groups being excluded from the major vaccine trials (Doshi, 2020).

Many governments and health regulators have said that they would approve "safe and effective" COVID vaccines. I hope they will read far more into the manufacturer's testing data than the fudged effectiveness figures they are already quoting... UPDATE: I was confident that the regulators would do the right thing, but then this is 2020 and common sense and science has completely gone out the window. The UK health regulator has today (2nd Dec, 2020) approved the Pfizer COVID vaccine based on their fraudulent 95% effectiveness claims. The UK will begin rolling out this vaccine within days). (The Guardian, 2020). Also, if the Pfizer vaccine has only recently been completed and only just approved, how can they start rolling out millions of doses within days, as the company and government have said, unless it had already been producing that many vaccines for months?! So they have been producing an untested and unapproved vaccine for months, and just doing the paperwork (ie, "testing" and data manipulation) as a formality...

Most governments, such as in the USA and Australia, have already exempted the vaccine manufacturers from any liability from lawsuits due to any side effects, adverse reactions, or deaths that may result from their COVID vaccines. This isn't helping those companies to keep them honest or to test for or make a safe or effective product, as we have just seen.

Some of these concerns, and more, have been raised by other doctors and scientists, including Peter Doshi, an associate editor of the British Medical Journal, who I have referenced in this article (Doshi, 2020). He has been calling for independence and transparency in the COVID-19 clinical trials and their data and findings.

And the worst thing is... the government, and your favourite airline, cafe or restaurant, and even your job, are ready to stop you using any of these services, based on a BS pathology test which doesn't work, and a BS vaccine which also hasn't been tested properly, not likely to work or be as effective as the manufacturers say, or even be safe (as it has not been tested for this!)... All of our future lives are likely to depend on the outcomes of these vaccines, the lobbying from the pharmaceutical companies, and the stupid politicians that implement new laws based on all these fraudulent and untested vaccines.

If you make more people aware of this information and that our lives cannot and must not be dependent on these vaccines, we can stop this madness.

My next article will be on other findings of theses vaccine trials...

References:

AstraZeneca. (2020). Clinical Study Protocol - Amendment 2 -A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study in Adults to Determine the Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of AZD1222, a Non-replicating ChAdOx1 Vector Vaccine, for the Prevention of COVID-19. Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://s3.amazonaws.com/ctr-med-7111/D8110C00001/52bec400-80f6-4c1b-8791-0483923d0867/c8070a4e-6a9d-46f9-8c32-cece903592b9/D8110C00001_CSP-v2.pdf
 
Becker's Hospital Review. (2020). AstraZeneca releases COVID-19 vaccine protocol.  Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/pharmacy/astrazeneca-releases-covid-19-vaccine-protocol.html
 
Doshi, P. (2020). Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us? British Medical Journal, 371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4037
 
Pfizer. (2020a). mRNA - Technology at the forefront during a global pandemic. Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://www.pfizer.com/news/hot-topics/mrna_technology_at_the_forefront_during_a_global_pandemic
 
Pfizer. (2020b). A Phase 1/2/3, placebo-controlled, randomized, observer-blind, dose-finding study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of SARS_COV-2 RNA vaccine candidates against COVID-19 in healthy individuals. Pfizer.
 
The Guardian. (2020a). UK approves Pfizer/BioNTech Covid vaccine for rollout next week. Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/dec/02/pfizer-biontech-covid-vaccine-wins-licence-for-use-in-the-uk
 
The Guardian. (2020b). Oxford Covid vaccine works in all ages, trials suggest. Retrieved 3rd December 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/27/covid-vaccine-uk-oxford-university-astrazeneca-works-in-all-ages-trials-suggest
​
0 Comments

The COVID-19 vaccine won't be mandatory, but illegal coercion will be used to try and make you get it

4/12/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
If you haven't figured it out already, the whole coronavirus political agenda and resulting restrictions, lockdowns and infringements on your daily lives, is NOT about a virus. It's about governments implementing new laws for controlling the population and implementing a mass vaccination program, for a virus which affects next to no-one under 50 years of age or who has no existing chronic health conditions. Or in other words, the virus does NOT affect 99.999% of people.

The Australian Government, and other governments worldwide, have said that they would like everyone to get the coronavirus vaccine when it becomes available. Many stoopid politicians (yes, you Dan Andrews and others) have said that we can't go back to "normal" (I really hate that word now!) until a vaccine is available and the whole population gets it.

Unfortunately the Australian constitution (section 51, xxiii) states that the government cannot make any medical treatment mandatory or to use coercion to enforce a mandate, and medical treatments can only be given lawfully with the individual's full informed consent. This includes vaccinations. Various state laws in Australia also have a charter of human rights that similarly prevent medical treatments without full consent.

So instead the state and federal governments and politicians have already been warning us that a COVID vaccination will be "as close to mandatory as possible", which the Prime Minister has said recently (ABC news, 2020). But that means using coercion, which is also illegal. Never mind a few broken laws from hypocritical and lying politicians... it wouldn't be the first time.

If you decide that the new, untested, and unproven, and even unnecessary COVID vaccination is not your cup of tea, and you quite rightly want to decline it because you have read the research on the lack of safety testing or the lack of inert placebo-controlled trials (some COVID vaccine tests are using the dangerous meningococcal vaccine as the "control" group!) or you simply want to exercise your right to not have a "medical treatment" or be coerced into some government-sponsored propaganda... then you might be in for a shock.

The Australian government updated many laws during the alleged pandemic, including the Biosecurity Act (2015). It now states that (Hart, 2020):
• If an individual is required to comply with a biosecurity measure (wearing of a mask or vaccination), they can only do so if the individual consents to the measure, BUT
• An individual failing to comply with a biosecurity measure may be committing an offence, and
• The penalty for failing to comply with a biosecurity measure is 5 years in jail, or a 300-unit penalty, or both.
• Under Commonwealth Law, a "penalty unit" implies a fine of $222.
Hence a 300-unit penalty for not complying with a directive to get the COVID vaccine, which is legally voluntary (!), IF such a vaccine can actually be developed, can be $66,600! Or 5 years jail, or both.

I don't think there are enough spaces in jail for everyone who is likely to tell the government where to go with a COVID vaccine requirement, or enough court time to process all the cases. There are a couple of legal firms around Australia who are challenging many of the ridiculous fines being handed out by over-zealous police around the country, based on illegal "laws".

The potential penalties of 5 years in jail or a $66,600 fine, or both, is ridiculous, excessive, and just plain stupid - for a virus that is found only after testing people who have no symptoms, where only 0.3% of those who are tested are given a "positive" test result, based on a PCR test that reports up to 80% of results as false positives, which only causes issues in people over 50 years of age who have one or more existing chronic health issues, and when 99.9% of them still survive...

If these penalties are so excessive, to attempt to coerce you into a non-existent vaccine, while claiming that this is "voluntary" or "not mandatory", you have to wonder why does the government want to force this onto you, your family and you kids? Do you think this is fair?
​
Stay informed, and stay healthy!



References:
ABC News. (2020). COVID vaccine likely to be mandatory in Australia, Scott Morrison says after signing deal with Oxford University. Retrieved 4th November 2020 from https://www.abc.net.au/.../morrison-coronavirus.../12572992
Hart, E. (2020). Covid-19: Less haste, more safety. British Medical Journal, 370. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3258
0 Comments

    COPYRIGHT

    All articles here are Copyright (c) to Ross Walter Nutritionist & Naturopath (2015-2022). You are welcome to share these articles in your personal or business marketing, in full and referencing this website.
    If you wish to have specific health articles written for your business, please ask via email to [email protected]  

    Archives

    March 2025
    September 2024
    May 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015

    Categories

    All
    5:2 Diet
    Acidity
    Acne
    Acrylamide
    ADHD
    ADHD Medications
    ADHD Treatments
    Aged Care Home
    AIDS
    Alcohol
    Alkaline Food
    Allergies
    Aluminium
    Alzheimer's
    Anaemia
    Antibacterial
    Antibiotics
    Anti Inflammatories
    Anti-inflammatories
    Anxiety
    Aromatherapy
    Arsenic
    Artificial Sweeteners
    Atherosclerosis
    Autism
    Autoimmune Conditions
    Baby Powder
    Baking Soda
    Banned By Facebook
    Bipolar Disorder
    Blending
    Blood Clots
    Blood Glucose
    Blood Sugar
    Body Autonomy
    Bone Density
    Bowel Movement
    Bowels
    BPA Free Plastic
    BPA-free Plastic
    BPA Plastic
    BPS Plastic
    Burns
    Cacao
    Calcium
    Calories
    Cancer
    Cancer Education
    Cancer In Children
    Cancer Prevention
    Cancer Treatments
    Cannabis
    Carb Adapted
    Carbohydrates
    Carcinogens
    Causes
    Celebrity
    Censorship
    Cervical Cancer
    Chemicals
    Children's Health
    Chocolate
    Cholesterol
    Chronic Disease
    Chronic Fatigue
    Chronic Inflammation
    CICO
    Climate Change
    Clinical Trials
    Codeine
    Coeliac Disease
    Coffee
    Cold And Flu Prevention
    Common Cold
    Constipation
    Contraception
    Cooking
    Cookware
    Coronavirus
    Coronavirus Lockdowns
    Coronavirus Research
    Coronavirus Statistics
    Coronavirus Testing
    Coronavirus Tracking
    Coronavirus Vaccines
    Corporate Sponsorship
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    COVID 19 Testing
    COVID-19 Testing
    COVID 19 Vaccine
    COVID-19 Vaccine
    COVID 19 Vax Issues
    COVID-19 Vax Issues
    Cravings
    DAA
    Dairy
    Dental Health
    Depression
    Detox
    Diabetes
    Dieting
    Dietitian
    Dietitians
    Digestive System
    Documentary Review
    Drug Regulators
    EAT Lancet Diet
    EAT-Lancet Diet
    EBV
    Eczema
    Eggs
    E Health
    E-health
    Elderly
    Endocrine Disruptors
    Endometriosis
    Endorsements
    Energy
    Enlarged Prostate
    Environmental Health
    Environmental Toxins
    Epstein-Barr Virus
    Essential Nutrients
    Essential Oils
    Evidence Based
    Exercise
    Farming
    Fast Food
    Fasting
    Fat Adapted
    Fatigue
    Fats
    Female Health
    Female Hormones
    Fermentation
    Fermented Foods
    Fertility
    Fibre
    Fibroids
    Fibromyalgia
    Film Review
    Fish Oil
    Fitness
    Flu
    Fluoride
    Flu Vaccine
    Folate
    Folic Acid
    Food Additives
    Food Allergies
    Food Containters
    Food Guidelines
    Food Industry
    Food Ingredients
    Food Intake
    Food Intolerances
    Food Labelling
    Food Labels
    Food Production
    Food Pyramid
    Food Sensitivities
    Food Star Rating
    Fracking
    Fructose
    Gardasil Vaccine
    Genetically Modified Foods
    Genetic Modification
    Genetics
    Genocide
    Germ Theory
    Glandular Fever
    Global Warming
    Glucose
    Gluten
    Gluten Free Food
    Gluten-free Food
    Glyphosate
    GMO
    Goals
    Government
    Grains
    Gut Bacteria
    Gut-brain Connection
    Gut Health
    Hand Washing
    Health Funds
    Health Information
    Health Insurance
    Health Myths
    Health Policy
    Health Star Ratings
    Health Statistics
    Healthy Fats
    Heartburn
    Heart Disease
    Heart Health
    Heavy Metals
    Herd Immunity
    High Blood Pressure
    HIV
    Hormonal Issues
    Hormone Disrupting
    Hormones
    HPV
    HPV Vaccine
    Hydroxychloroquine HCQ
    Hygiene
    Hypoxia
    IBS
    Immune Suppressives
    Immune System
    Indigestion
    Infections
    Infertility
    Inflammation
    Influenza
    Informed Consent
    Insomnia
    Insulin
    Iron Deficiency
    Irritable Bowel
    Juicing
    Ketogenic Diet
    LCHF
    Leaky Gut
    Liver
    Low Carb Diet
    Low Fat Diets
    Low GI
    Lung Disease
    Macronutrients
    Man Flu
    Manuka Honey
    Margarine
    Marketing
    Masks
    Meal Replacements
    Measles
    Meat
    Medical Corruption
    Medical Privacy
    Medical Records
    Medical Science
    Medical Testing
    Medications
    Medicinal Cannabis
    Melanoma
    Melatonin
    Men's Health
    Mental Health
    Mental Illness
    Microbiome
    Microwave Meals
    Microwaves
    Miscarriage
    MMR Vaccine
    Moderation
    Modern Diets
    Modern Medicine
    Monkeypox
    Motivation
    MRNA Vaccines
    MTHFR
    My Health Record
    Natural Therapies
    Naturopathy
    Nerve Damage
    Neuropathy
    New Years Resolutions
    NSAIDs
    Nursing Home
    Nutrient Deficiencies
    Nutrients
    Nutrient Toxicity
    Nutrigenomics
    Nutrition
    Nutritional Medicine
    Nutrition Guidelines
    Nutritionist
    Nutrition Research
    Obesity
    Oestrogen
    Oil
    Omega-3
    One World Diet
    Osteoporosis
    Oxidative Damage
    Pain
    Painkillers
    Paleo
    Pandemic
    Pap Smears
    Pathology Testing
    PCOS
    PCR Testing
    Personalised Consultations
    Pet Foods
    Pets
    Pharmaceuticals
    PH Of Food
    Plant Based Diets
    Plant-based Diets
    Plastic
    Plastic Bottles
    PMDD
    PMS
    Polyunsaturated Fats
    Poo
    Population Growth
    POTS
    PPI
    Preconception
    Pregnancy
    Primal
    Privacy
    Probiotics
    Processed Foods
    Psoriasis
    Pyrrole Disorder
    Red Meat
    Red Wine
    Reflux
    Research
    Respiratory Infections
    Resveratrol
    Reviews
    Rice
    Root Cause Analysis
    Root Causes
    Roundup
    Salt
    SARS
    Saturated Fat
    Schizophrenia
    Scientific Evidence
    Scientific Research
    SIBO
    Skin
    Skin Cancer
    Skin Conditions
    Sleep
    Smallpox
    Sore Throat
    Soy
    Soy Products
    Spike Protein
    Sports
    Sports Nutrition
    Spring
    Statistics
    Stevia
    Stomach Function
    Stress
    Sugar
    Sunburn
    Sunglasses
    Sunlight
    Sun Safe
    Sunscreens
    Talcum Powder
    TGA
    The Medical Model
    Thyroid
    Tonsillitis
    Tooth Decay
    Toxicity
    Toxins And Chemicals
    Treat The Causes
    Treat The Whole Body
    Type 1 Diabetes
    Type 2 Diabetes
    Ulcers
    Vaccination
    Vaccine Adverse Events
    Vaccine Passports
    Vaccine Research
    Vaccines
    Vaccine Safety
    Vaccine Testing
    Vegan
    Vegetables
    Viral Infections
    Virus
    Vitamin C
    Vitamin D
    Water
    Water Fluoridation
    Weight Gain
    Weight Loss
    Wheat
    Whole Grains
    Winter
    Winter Health
    Womens Health
    Would Healing
    Xenoestrogens
    Xeno-oestrogens
    Zinc

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly