Ross Walter Nutritionist and Naturopath health articles and blog

Authorities find links to AZ vaccine causing blood clots and platelet issues, and increased risks of these in women

10/4/2021

More and more incidences of post-COVID-19 vaccine side effects are being reported in international adverse events databases, particularly of blood clotting issues, but many other issues, including deaths...

The authorities keep saying that there is no link to the vaccine, until very recently (9th April 2021) with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) reporting links between the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and the blood clots and low platelet counts in many people who have had this vaccine (TGA, 2021). These findings fully justify the concerns that many countries (approximately 25) who have either banned, suspended or restricted the use of the AZ vaccine. Perhaps, based on the new findings and new research, the restrictions should be expanded or even having the AZ vaccine completely banned, to protect everyone from this and other side effects - which are much higher than the other COVID-19 vaccines.

The TGA also notes that while any specific links to gender are not known, but there have been many more adverse clotting events in women than men. This is a concern as there are more female health-care workers (TGA, 2021).

The Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) has recently (8th April 2021) changed its recommendation for the AZ vaccine to be used in adults under 50 years of age, because of the increasing risks of clotting issues in older adults.

The TGA recommends reporting any side effects from the AZ or other vaccines to your country's adverse events database, so these issues can be monitored and investigated. If you know of anyone who has any side effects from any of the COVID-19 vaccines, make sure they report the issues to their country's adverse events register.

References:

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021). AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 vaccine: Updated safety advisory – rare and unusual blood clotting syndrome (thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia). Retrieved 9th April 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/astrazeneca-chadox1-s-covid-19-vaccine

2 Comments

New study finds no benefit from wearing masks for preventing coronavirus infection, but they cause many issues

9/4/2021

0 Comments

The heavily debated topic of wearing masks as a preventative against the SARS-2 coronavirus is still an issue. On one hand it may appear to the media, the general public and politicians that wearing of masks makes sense to reducing your risks of this or other respiratory infections. But many published studies actually show that the wearing of masks has very limited scientific evidence, despite what you may have heard in the media or from health authorities.

A new study published in January 2021 has investigated and summarised many other studies on the use of different types of masks (or no masks) on the prevention of transmission of the SARS-2 coronavirus, as well as the health risks and complications that the wearing of masks may cause (Vainshelboim, 2021). This new study is very appropriate, with many people currently affected by governmental mask mandates.

Some interesting points in this new study, found these observations (which were found in other studies too):

N95 respirator masks are tight-fitting commercial masks which have a filter for the incoming air to reduce exposure to infectious or damaging particles. The filter makes breathing more difficult. However N95 respirator masks offer NO protection to other people, if the wearer has any respiratory infection, as there is no filter on exhaled breath, hence can INCREASE the transmission of infections to others!
Surgical masks are designed to be used in STERILE environments (such as in hospitals) more as a barrier against splashes, spit and other body fluids to prevent contaminating the wearer. As they are very loose fitting, they offer very little protection from infections to other people
Fabric and cloth masks offer the most minimal protection or filtration
The majority of COVID deaths were in the elderly with chronic health conditions already. The SARS-2 virus may exacerbate existing conditions but rarely causes death by itself
Masks can restrict breathing, to cause hypoxemia (low oxygen pressure in the blood), hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide in the blood), increased respiratory complications, self-contamination (from repeated touching of surfaces and the mask, or breathing in contaminated air), and exacerbation of existing chronic conditions
Conversely, increasing breathing and especially oxygen intake levels has been used for medical treatments for hospitalised patients and especially those with COVID-19 symptoms
Mild or moderate hypoxemia or hypercapnia from wearing masks can change energy metabolism, decrease pH levels (towards acidic) in cells and blood, and cause toxicity, oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, immunosuppression (poor immune function, at a time you really need it working!), and health deterioration
Severe hypoxemia and hypercapnia can cause cardiopulmonary and neurological conditions, including heart attacks, arrhythmias, dizziness, high or low blood pressure, fainting, fatigue, headaches, and other issues including death
Using surgical masks for a longer time (60 mins) can reduce the blood oxygen saturation by more than 1%
Masks are ineffective at blocking viral particles that are much smaller than the gaps in the threads of the masks, and filtration of masks is very poor
Breathing through masks increases the temperature and humidity of the mask and respiratory tracts, causing the release of toxic chemicals from the mask's materials, increasing the risks of breathing in other pathogens and toxic contaminants
There have been studies looking at the effects that masks have on reducing transmission or infectivity between people infected with SARS-2. There was no difference in transmission rates between those who wore masks or not.
Another study found no transmissions from an asymptomatic SARS-2 carrier to 445 others, even in a shared quarantine space for an average of 4-5 days
Even amongst healthcare workers, masks and respirators were not effective against transmission of viral infections, in many studies
One RCT study looking at cloth masks found a 13-times higher risk of flu-like illness, compared to those wearing a surgical mask or no mask
More studies comparing N95 respirators and surgical masks found no reduction in virus transmissions in the community (even with over 33,000 participants)
The World Health Organisation (WHO) changed their guidance on wearing masks from early 2020 to say that "masks were not required as no evidence was available for their benefit", to a few months later say that even cloth masks "can prevent the infected wearer transmitting the virus to others, and offer protection to the HEALTHY wearer against infection", but based on limited or no evidence
The CDC has stated that only people with symptoms should consider wearing a mask, and in asymptomatic people the wearing of masks was not recommended
There are many possible physical facial harms to the wearer of masks, such as lesions, dermatitis, worsening acne, and other discomfort
People with mental health disorders, developmental disabilities, hearing problems, or living in humid environments, children, or those with respiratory conditions, are at SIGNIFICANT health risk for complications and harm
Wearing of masks remove self-identity and affects social interactions and relationships, resulting in poor mental and physical health
Wearing of masks was associated with a 50% increase in mortality due to depression, anxiety, and suicide
The fear associated with the pandemic and effects of wearing masks activates the "flight or fight" response of higher cortisol (stress hormone) and its effects on the body - reduced brain function, and greatly reduced immune system function, being the natural and fundamental body system that is needed at this time to protect you from infections or to fight them
The long-term consequences of wearing masks can be severe and devastating, as a result of physiological and psychological stresses and the hypoxemia and hypercapnia effects - including increased risks of heart disease and cancers, due to effects on the blood and a reduced function of the immune system.

The study concludes with the following points:

Scientific evidence is lacking for the wearing of masks to reduce mortality or morbidity from infectious or viral diseases including the SARS-2 coronavirus
Both medical and non-medical masks are ineffective to reduce human-to-human transmission and infectivity of SARS-2 and COVID-19
Wearing of masks has adverse physiological and psychological effects
Long-term consequences of wearing of masks on health are severely detrimental.

Local, state and federal governments, businesses and companies, public health advisors, doctors, and other healthcare practitioners MUST give quality advice based on the scientific evidence, NOT on what may appear to be common sense (that the wearing of masks in this alleged pandemic may appear to be). There is very little scientific evidence (or none that I have seen) that shows that wearing of any type of mask offers protection to the wearer or to others, for the prevention of transmission of viral respiratory infections, including the SARS-2 coronavirus.

All health authorities should reconsider the mask mandates in light of this study, and many others. There are other better ways to reduce the risks of this virus, and improve immune system function and overall health, to prevent infections or protect you from them. That is what they have NOT done thus far in this pandemic and this has to change.

Sadly you can't quote this and other studies as a reason to not wear a mask. But you can and should use the available medical exemptions to not wear one, especially for children, or those with respiratory conditions, mental health conditions, disabilities, or other valid reasons.

Stay healthy!

References:
Vainshelboim, B. (2021). Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis. Medical Hypotheses, 146, 110411. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110411

0 Comments

Genocide of the elderly (Senicide/geronticide) - Part 1

9/4/2021

1 Comment

The three greatest risk factors of mortality from the coronavirus are:
1. Older age
2. Having more than one chronic health condition
3. Having a low functioning immune system.

In the elderly, all of these risk factors are very common. Hence why they have the highest morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.

It should be common sense then to reduce mortality of those at risk, that public health advice would be to help reduce the risks to people in these groups. But what advice have the authorities given to them:
1. Wash your hands
2. Stay away from others
3. Wear a mask (after months of saying "don't wear a mask").

And that's it. Pathetic.

It is well known that the elderly or those with many chronic health conditions have a lot of factors affecting their health such as:
• Nutrient deficiencies - from a poor diet
• Vitamin D deficiency - a MASSIVE problem, as it hugely reduces immune system function (Arnljots, Thorn, Elm, Moore & Sundvall, 2017)
• Reduced organ function
• Stress, loneliness, loss of partners or friends, and limited contact with family during COVID restrictions
• Medications - many medications reduce immune system function or cause adverse side effects.

The elderly, and those in aged care or nursing homes need the most support and beneficial preventatives and treatments. They are our most vulnerable people.

The elderly frequently suffer from malnutrition (up to 57%), deficiencies of multiple nutrients (of protein, water, vitamin D, B-vitamins, and more. These will affect their physical and mental health, and especially the function of their immune system. The elderly are more likely to die from infections than younger age groups. Nutrient support through improved dietary advice or supplementation CAN improve their nutritional status and immune system function (Wells & Dumbrell, 2006).

But never once has any Western government throughout this pandemic given any true and proven recommendations to the elderly, to improve their immune system function with preventions or treatments - such as very simple, cheap and very effective interventions of vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc etc. These treatments have been proven effective in multiple studies (Wells & Dumbrell, 2006).

Instead, the governments of the world have kept the elderly locked up, hidden from view and contact from their family. This doesn't help their mental or physical health.

Governments, health departments, and public health officials, and perhaps owners of aged care and nursing homes, have ignored the health of the elderly in this pandemic. They have NOT addressed the physical or mental health of them, or really ANYONE, in this pandemic, nor their nutritional status or immune system function to prevent or treat any respiratory infection. They could have done a LOT more to help. The government and health authorities have caused more deaths in the pandemic by their lack of action. They have contributed to the Genocide of the Elderly and those with chronic health issues. Genocide of the elderly is also called Senicide or Geronticide.

There is a lot more that can be done to protect our elderly. If the authorities are not doing anything, then YOU can.

I will expand on this more in my next article on this topic...

References:
Arnljots, R., Thorn, J., Elm, M., Moore, M., & Sundvall, P-D. (2017). Vitamin D deficiency was common among nursing home residents and associated with dementia: a cross sectional study of 545 Swedish nursing home residents. BMC Geriatrics, 17 (229).
Wells, J.L. & Dumbrell, A.C. (2006). Nutrition and Aging: Assessment and Treatment of Compromised Nutritional Status in Frail Elderly Patients. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 1 (1): 67–79. doi: 10.2147/ciia.2006.1.1.67

1 Comment

COVID check-in app mandatory in hospitality venues (Big Brother is watching you)

9/4/2021

0 Comments

The rona madness in Queensland continues... So we got down to only one new case at the end of the 3-day lockdown period, and the state government relaxed the restrictions to end the lockdown, except that the whole state still needs to wear a mask for another 2 weeks!

Then the Qld government quietly updates their website on the use of its new "Check In Qld" COVID-safe app, used to make it easier and quicker when checking into cafes, restaurants, pubs, businesses and other services using QR codes for contact tracing purposes.

The Qld government have now made the use of the app MANDATORY for all hospitality businesses from May 1st...

Other Aus states have their own similar apps - NSW, WA, and the ACT.

Previously the app was optional and being promoted as a single sign-on with your personal details once, and you just scan the business's QR code and it registers you at that location at that date and time. Now all hospitality businesses MUST use the app for contact tracing. If a customer doesn't have a compatible mobile phone, or doesn't want to use the app, the business must provide alternative options for getting all their contact details (Queensland Government, 2021).

If this app were truly about the health and safety of everyone during the times of COVID, it wouldn't only be used for hospitality businesses! But then again, such a widespread system will be invasive, restrictive, and abused by the government for more than what it is intended for.

The introduction of these new state government tracing apps also shows how pathetic the Federal government's COVID-Safe app is at contact tracing, yet the government wants you to now use BOTH systems together.

The penalties for a business not using the "Check in Qld" app are severe - if a business fails to register for the app by May 1st or doesn't implement this new tracing app, they face a fine of $13,345 or a 6 month holiday in prison (ABC News, 2021).

Queensland Council for Civil Liberties are concerned by the implementation of the app and the lack of laws around the privacy of the data collected, limiting the use or access of the data (such as to police without warrants), or how long the data will be kept before being destroyed. Police in other countries using similar apps have used the data for investigative purposes, which is a huge privacy issue (ABC News, 2021). Also missing from the Qld Gov website is when will the app no longer be needed.

Will the app be used for more contact tracking and tracing at other businesses and services? Yes, the government have confirmed that the app will be used in the future for libraries, banks, SCHOOLS, cinemas, petrol stations, tourism, entertainment venues, and more (ABC News, 2021).

Is this George Orwell's 1984? Big Brother? Or the start of China's social credit system being implemented here? (Constant tracking and monitoring of everyone, facial recognition cameras and software, logging in everywhere, and monitoring and analysis of every conversation, text, email, and social media post, because the government sees you as a threat). Is this really what you want?

The "Check-in Qld" system is too easily broken if people were to not enter their true contact details into the app for privacy reasons... The more the government demand these actions over our lives, the less likely that people will abide by the "rules".

This app and other government interventions are not about improving the health and safety of the population in the alleged pandemic. It's not about health when they are ignoring the most obvious aspects of your immune system, reducing the risks of infections, and anything else that affects your health. This is about control and monitoring of everyone.

Trust not the government.

References:
ABC News. (2021) Check-in Queensland COVID app to be mandatory from May. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/.../qld-covid.../100041132

Queensland Government. (2021). Check In Qld app. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from https://www.covid19.qld.gov.au/check-in-qld

0 Comments

Mortality rates in Australia in 2020 were far lower than in previous years. What pandemic?

9/4/2021

0 Comments

The official annual death rates in Australia for 2020 have just been released. The deaths during 2020, the start of the coronavirus pandemic, were a little surprising, as they have actually been much lower than in previous years.
Here's a comparison of the past 5 years data (ABS, 2021a):

Year 2017 deaths: 160,909
Year 2018 deaths: 158,493
Year 2019 deaths: 169,301
Year 2020 deaths: 141,116

(28,000 deaths LESS in 2020 than from 2019)

Some official comments on the 2020 death statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS, 2021a) include:

• 141,116 doctor certified deaths in 2020
• Some substantial differences in death numbers for some causes or diseases, including from cancer and diabetes
• Deaths due to respiratory disease were 16.2% LOWER than historical averages, for both chronic and acute respiratory diseases
• Influenza and pneumonia (a complication of flu and COVID-19) were 36% LOWER than historical averages
• Deaths due to heart diseases were below average for every month of 2020, and 10.7% LOWER than previous averages
• Deaths due to cancer, dementia and diabetes were HIGHER by 4%, 7.3% and 9.1%, no doubt due to reduced hospital access or changes in care due to COVID-19 restrictions
• The year 2020 had the LOWEST death rate of every year since 2009 (ABS, 2021b).

The Australian Government and media: "Nothing to see here..."

(I am reminded of the old "Charter boat" TV advert, for Australians who remember this?! Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UadHCpSjyew)

Stay healthy!

References:
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021a). Provisional Mortality Statistics. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from https://www.abs.gov.au/.../provisional.../jan-dec-2020

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021b). Deaths, Year of registration, Summary data, Sex, States, Territories and Australia. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from http://stat.data.abs.gov.au/Index.aspx...

0 Comments

Controversial or coincidental extension to Queensland's coronavirus state of emergency?

9/4/2021

1 Comment

Is it just a coincidence (no, not really, it never is a coincidence) that the Qld coronavirus pandemic "state of emergency" which was declared on 29th January 2020 was to expire on 31st March 2021... that is tomorrow, or 2 days after the latest "outbreak"?!

Now as a result of the latest announcement and lockdowns, the government can extend their emergency powers to continue this scam for longer.

I will repeat - the more people get tested for the coronavirus, the more cases they will find, from people who have no symptoms (and who never get any) because the PCR test is inaccurate and up to 80% of positive results are found to be negative on a retest. That is, 80% of positive results are "false positives", which the fear-mongering government and media will use against everyone to bring about more restrictions and lockdowns. I predicted this would happen as a result of their fear campaign to get more people tested. As a result, just 4 alleged cases amongst 5 million people in a small part of the state, has now affected everyone.

This will all end when 1) we stop getting tested, and 2) stop believing what the government and media are telling you, and 3) you stop letting them get away with this control of your life.

Here's the details of the Qld Government's emergency powers and dates:
justiceconnect.org.au/resources/how-the-queensland-governments-emergency-restrictions-on-covid-19-work/

1 Comment

Brisbane coronavirus outbreak lockdown and masking

9/4/2021

0 Comments

Based on just 4 alleged coronavirus cases here in Brisbane, the city has been locked down - schools closed, businesses shut, people told to stay at home, and masks mandated for the WHOLE STATE!

It is utterly ridiculous to make the whole state of 5 million people over 1.8 million square kilometres and stretching 7000km from the southern border to the top, to wear a mask based on 4 cases! There is NO science to justify this, and plenty of quality studies showing wearing of masks does nothing to stop the spread of respiratory infections or even COVID.

A reminder that despite the mask mandate, it is still dangerous for some people to wear a mask, and hence some people cannot wear a mask. So if you see someone without a mask, please don't launch into a tirade of abuse, but respect their reasons that you know NOTHING about. Leave them be.

In any case, if you are wearing a mask and someone else isn't, you are protected right?! It's nothing to do with you why they aren't wearing one. People are not going to deliberately not wear a mask, knowing the abuse that some people may likely give them.

There are some people exempted from wearing a mask:
1) Children 12 years or younger
2) Those with medically exempt conditions - often respiratory conditions, facial or skin conditions, but also mental health conditions, disabilities (ie deafness or need to communicate with someone with a disability), or many other conditions.

You also do not need proof for not wearing a mask. Some GPs can write a medical certificate letter for this exemption, but it is not needed, according to the Qld Health website.

Police or security or other staff may ask why you aren't wearing a mask, so just say "I have a valid medical exemption for not wearing one, thank you.". They may push their luck and ask for what your exemption is or for proof of the exemption. If you have a medical certificate for exemption, then show them. Even though proof of this is not required (again, according to the Qld Health website) showing proof can diffuse the situation more quickly. However police or security or other staff cannot ask you what your health issue is - that is private between you and your doctors. It is a medical privacy issue, and the reason why medical records are kept under tight security with access only to those who are legally allowed to see them. If asked, just say "I am under no legal obligation to tell you of my medical issues, which is covered by the Commonwealth Privacy Act of 1988".

If you are denied access to shops or services for not wearing a mask or any "No mask, no entry" signs, as there are many people who are misinformed on this issue, ask to speak to their manager. Remind them that refusing access to someone with a health issue and who has a legally valid exemption is breaking the law (Disability Discrimination Act of 1992) and substantial fines and penalties can apply to the person preventing access and to the business or organisation.

If you still get denied access to businesses or organisations or if you feel you are discriminated against for not wearing a mask, report them to the Human Rights Advocates who will contact the business and get them to change their policies based on law: www.humanrightsadvocates.com.au

For more information and links to the Qld Health website on the exemptions, or the other laws mentioned here, please refer to the attached document, or print this and take with you:

drive.google.com/file/d/1SsQeWm8Q0ZREdEGFP8BIRzR1i3hGCYVT/view?fbclid=IwAR0DgFK55vc_XoW-spiyams9TSXdRHssXhVkHfekSopJwKmM3ni_jW6gM6c

0 Comments

The European medicines regulator covered up issues with the Pfizer mRNA covid-19 vaccine

9/4/2021

0 Comments

While most of the news on the COVID-19 vaccines of late has been on the 25-or-more countries who have suspended their use of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine due to serious adverse events and deaths, the alternative Pfizer vaccine hasn't exactly been doing much better. And worse, the medicines regulators, who are supposed to protect the public, have been covering this up...

The issues of the Pfizer COVID vaccine haven't officially been made public, as the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the medicines regulator of the European Union, concealed the issues together with Pfizer, that many of their batches were defective and contained unstable or less mRNA than they should have, which may have resulted in a less-effective vaccine that might not provide any protection from the virus. In essence, the EU drug regulator was protecting the Pfizer pharmaceutical company (and shareholders) from any adverse news leaking that their product may not work... instead of protecting the people of Europe.

News of the EMA/Pfizer cover-up only broke when hackers accessed the EMA servers in December 2020 and took 40Mb of data, emails, and files and released them to the dark web and to journalists and scientists. One of those journalists published an article in the prestigious British Medical Journal (BMJ) to highlight the issues with the Pfizer quality standards, and the subsequent cover-up by Pfizer and the EMA.

The leaked documented showed the following issues with the Pfizer COVID vaccine:

The mRNA sequences were not all complete - with differences in integrity of the mRNA across batches varying by 55-78%, or 22-45% of them were defective
If a mRNA protein is in ANY way damaged or not 100% accurate, it will not work to help a cell to product the correct spike protein that triggers an immune response or antibodies to protect you from the coronavirus
Alternatively, the damaged mRNA in the Pfizer vaccines can still get into cells, and the cells may still use the mRNA to produce a protein, but a damaged one which can cause ANY effect or damage to your health
The BMJ asked all COVID mRNA vaccine manufacturers what is their % of mRNA are intact - none have responded
The EMA knew as early as November 2020 that Pfizer's factories were already producing vaccine batches that did not meet their quality specifications (due to the irregular or damaged mRNA)
The EMA was concerned enough on 23rd November 2020 by the findings that they issued two "major objections" to Pfizer along with other questions to resolve their vaccine production quality issues. Subsequent communications between the EMA and Pfizer on 25th November (2 days later), but unclear as to what testing was done, showed a slight improvement in quality at approximately 70-75% intact mRNA. This still means 25-30% incomplete or damaged mRNA in Pfizer's batches
It was also noted that the medicines regulators do not have any guidelines or standards for making sure the new mRNA vaccines safe and effective or that the manufacturers do the right things in their vaccine development, production and testing
Despite knowing the issues, the EMA still approved the Pfizer vaccine for use and to be given to hundreds of millions of people in Europe, on 21st December 2020, stating on their website that, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (covid-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”. The EMA lied.

The leaked documents show that the regulators are not interested in your health or safety, but more into protecting their customers, being the pharma companies who pay big bucks to have their products approved to be given to the public. Major incidents which involve the quality and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines are being ignored or hidden from the public, so as to maintain the pandemic and vaccine sales.

The AZ vaccine clearly isn't safe, and the Pfizer vaccine doesn't contain the correct mRNA in up to 30% of batches... And now you know why so many people are having serious adverse events from both these experimental vaccines which have barely had any testing done (which should have found these issues, before they were approved to be given to the public).

Issues with the Pfizer vaccine defects should have been big news, but the media have said nothing, unlike for the AZ vaccine. Everyone needs to be made aware of this...

References:

British Medical Journal. (2021). The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability. Retrieved 26th March 2021 from www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n627

Gospa News. (2021). Pfizer Covid-Vaccines with “mRNA Flaws” in EU. Company and EMA concealed, but BMJ discovered. Retrieved 26th March 2021 from www.gospanews.net/en/2021/03/11/pfizer-covid-vaccines-with-mrna-flaws-in-eu-company-and-ema-concealed-but-bmj-discovered/

0 Comments

Vaccine passports were a conspiracy in 2020, now reality

9/4/2021

0 Comments

Israel recently became the pilot country to implement a "COVID passport" for proof of a COVID vaccination, in order to live or do anything. The government coercion for the vaccine (which is nationally and internationally illegal, but they still did it) was immense, and made worse with the implementation of the new COVID passport (their "Green Pass") for exclusive access to pretty much all services including buying a coffee, accessing gyms, hotels, concerts, and even buying food at cafes and restaurants being limited to those who have had their COVID shot... Air travel (without quarantine) outside of Israel will be restricted to the vaccinated soon (The Guardian, 2021).

And despite most of the population getting their COVID shot, albeit under extreme pressure, they STILL have to wear a mask, social distance, and other restrictions, even after getting the vaccine! So what's the point?

But now Europe are considering the same. Today, the European Commission were to vote on their own "Green Pass", a similar digital identity document for the purposes of identifying those who have had the COVID vaccine and to allow access to services and travel in the EU (European Commission, 2021).

The EU Green Pass will be used:
1) To show your COVID vaccine status
2) To show your COVID test results - whether you tested positive or negative, or if you have COVID antibodies after recovering from the infection
3) By all other EU states as needed, until the WHO calls and end to the pandemic
4) To facilitate movement (without quarantine) through the EU
5) To store personal information.

The European Commissioner for Justice said that the EU Green Pass "will not be a pre-condition to free movement and it will not discriminate in any way.", but I doubt that this will be their policy long-term, or if this is true at all. Even implementing such a passport to identify one part of the population and not others, and restricting use or access to services IS discriminatory.

I warned you about this in very early 2020, and Facebook fact checked it as false, despite the fact that I referenced press releases from companies who were developing the technology for this and were open about what it was to be used for.

There is still time to stop this medical fascism. Protest as much and loudly as you can, write and speak to your local, state and federal politicians, and anything else you can do to stop this happening. This is discrimination, and it is dividing the community, splitting family and friends, and is illegal coercion to comply without allowing for informed consent (ie, medical tyranny). The right for freedom of movement and access to services is a basic human right, and must be maintained.

Stay healthy!

References:
European Commission. (2021). Coronavirus: Commission proposes a Digital Green Certificate. Retrieved 25th March 2021 from ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_1181

The Guardian. (2021). Green pass: how are Covid vaccine passports working for Israel? Retrieved 25th March 2021 from www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/28/green-pass-how-are-vaccine-passports-working-in-israel

0 Comments

Authorities find links to AZ vaccine causing blood clots and platelet issues, and increased risks of these in women

New study finds no benefit from wearing masks for preventing coronavirus infection, but they cause many issues

Genocide of the elderly (Senicide/geronticide) - Part 1

COVID check-in app mandatory in hospitality venues (Big Brother is watching you)

Mortality rates in Australia in 2020 were far lower than in previous years. What pandemic?

Controversial or coincidental extension to Queensland's coronavirus state of emergency?

Brisbane coronavirus outbreak lockdown and masking

The European medicines regulator covered up issues with the Pfizer mRNA covid-19 vaccine

Vaccine passports were a conspiracy in 2020, now reality

COPYRIGHT

Archives

Categories