Ross Walter Nutritionist and Naturopath health articles and blog

Heart disease sign to look out for in self, friends and family

14/11/2022

Heart disease is the largest cause of mortality in men and women in Western countries. There are are many different types of heart disease, many signs of heart disease, and many possible tests to check for these conditions. Early diagnosis is essential for getting a treatment to reduce the risks of mortality. But sadly all too often, those with higher risks of heart disease don't get tests done regularly to find the warning signs and make the preventative treatments required.

But there are some less well known physical signs of heart disease risk, which should perhaps become more well known by family members and friends, in order to recommend or persuade those with the risk factors to seek professional help with testing, diagnosis and treatment. The physical sign, that being externally visible, even if the person doesn't feel unhealthy, is called Frank's sign, or diagonal earlobe crease (Więckowski, Gallina, Surdacki & Chyrchel, 2021).

While the earlobe crease is a little known and seldom-used, it is quick and non-invasive and easy to interpret and should be used according to the referenced study and others.
These studies suggest that the earlobe crease is a sign of chronic hypoxia (low oxygen levels), possibly from atherosclerosis (plaques in the major arteries which can reduce blood flow) and low oxygen supply to the cells and tissues.

The referenced study concluded that the diagnostic accuracy of the earlobe crease is comparable to the traditional electrocardiography (ECG) testing in detecting significant coronary stenosis/blockages and hypoxia. It shouldn't be the only test used, but isn't always a clinically accurate indicator in all cases. But it can give big clues to friends and family to look for this sign and recommend (or persuade) those with this sign to get some proactive testing and treatment if needed.

Medical advice and testing is needed for those with the Frank's earlobe crease, but medical advice does not include finding the root causes of the heart disease, but only to temporarily remove the issue with surgery and "manage" it with medications that cause more symptoms, and not about prevention or stopping the issue coming back.

Natural therapies are more focussed on prevention and finding and fixing the root causes in each person. This is where I can help - if you have this earlobe sign, or know someone who does, please see me for testing advice, and also for root cause analysis and proactive preventative advice and treatments.

Stay healthy!

References:

Więckowski, K., Gallina, T., Surdacki, A., & Chyrchel, B. (2021). Diagonal Earlobe Crease (Frank’s Sign) for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10 (13), 2799. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132799

0 Comments

Renowned Cardiologist calls it a pandemic of misinformation

30/9/2022

0 Comments

Hindsight is always amazing... When you look back at decisions or choices made and reflect on whether that was the right thing to do, or did it work, or were there in fact issues that could be corrected or avoided for next time.

Dr Aseem Malhotra is an experienced and renowned heart surgeon and Cardiologist in London, UK. In a very recent interview to promote his two new published studies, he reflected on what has happened with regard to the COVID-19 vaccine program and was there a cost-benefit outcome from this worldwide clinical trial on (almost) every man, woman and child? His two studies may be seen as controversially titled, but I think is very fair and accurate - entitled "Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine", parts 1 and 2 (Malhotra, 2022a; Malhotra, 2022b).

In the interview about these 2 new studies (Youtube, 2022), Dr Malhotra said he was very pro-vaccine, and got the two Pfizer shots early in their promotion, and he was even on TV shows promoting and recommending people to get them, and even attacking those who had "vaccine hesitancy" (those who didn't want to get the shots because of their lack of testing and having major risks). He said he got the shots and was promoting them as he said "I didn't conceive even the possibility, even though he had some scepticism of the benefit, I didn't think it would cause any significant harm at all". He then said that information changed and evolved, and he started looking at the data on the benefits vs side effects of the COVID-19 shots more critically because his father suffered a sudden heart attack and passed away in July 2021 and his post-mortem findings didn't make sense to him, with critical heart issues showing, despite being fit and healthy and having no family history of heart disease. His father's health and lifestyle, he said, was much better in recent years after getting a coronary calcium score test and other good test results.

Dr Malhotra then started seeing more information on the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) showing that they cause coronary inflammation and increase heart attack risk, and huge 25% increase in heart attacks in 16-39 year olds which was explicitly linked to the mRNA vaccines and not to the COVID-19 infection as such. And the icing on the cake with clear potential harms of these vaccines, which isn't being discussed, based in a published study in the Vaccine journal, re-evaluating the original randomised controlled data from the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials, of the data which lead to their being approved for use, showing that someone is more likely to suffer a SERIOUS adverse event (such as a life-changing disability, hospitalisation etc) from the mRNA vaccines at a rate of one in 800 vaccines given. The risk of a serious vaccine reaction was higher than the risk of being hospitalised from the COVID-19 infection. Other studies of real-world data shows similar rates confirming the side effect risks of the mRNA vaccines is higher than being hospitalised from COVID-19, with Norway data showing a risk of one in 926 vaccines. This data is still based on the official REPORTED cases to government adverse events databases. The risk of the most vulnerable group, being the over-80s being hospitalised from COVID-19 is just one in 7000. True numbers of mRNA vaccine side effects are likely to be MUCH higher, with 90+% of adverse events not being reported at all.

Based on this data and his findings, Dr Malhotra recommends that the mRNA vaccines must be stopped while further investigations are done.

Another issue that Dr Malhotra has about the COVID-19 vaccine program is the right of "informed consent", being that people have an absolute right to decide for themselves on their health choices and their body, being based on good quality "evidence" from studies and data and "health officials" giving people that good quality information as risks vs benefits of the shots.

The second part of the two studies that Dr Malhotra has just published is about looking at "how we got it wrong, why we got it wrong, and what are the solutions moving forward". He has previously on three occasions called for public enquiries into excess deaths from prescribed medications, as deaths from doctors prescribing drugs is the THIRD most common cause of death behind heart disease and cancer.

Dr Malhotra says one of the biggest problems in health and medicine is "big pharma", referring to the major pharmaceutical companies with their "unchecked power", and "who function in ways which are anti-human, and they are profit-making machines, and they function like a psychopath, and have a history of deceiving people for profit and causing unnecessary harm".

Moving forward he says we need to:

Make sure that the medicines regulator isn't funded by the pharmaceutical industry, as the UK, US and Australian regulators certainly are, and in many other countries too
Disassociate medical education from pharmaceutical company sponsorship
Have independent testing of pharmaceutical drugs, and not relying on the pharma companies to do this (and manipulate their data).

Dr Malhotra agreed with the interviewer that the lack of any evidence of the COVID-19 vaccines preventing transmission made the vaccine mandates were absurd, unethical and criminal. He said that instead, the focus should have been on open discussions of the risks vs benefits and helping the most vulnerable, which would have likely given better outcomes with less harm, rather than the vaccines causing more harm than good in most people. The only benefit of the vaccine mandates was to the profit line of the pharma companies, despite the "extremely poor efficacy and unprecedented harm" they caused, and they are not interested in your health. He said we have to rebuild (the medical and health system) and move forward, by fixing the problems with "root cause analysis". All problems can be truly fixed by finding and fixing the root causes of the problem, not just symptom relief. He said even Doctors do not realise that the government medical regulators are part of the problem, with no independent testing being done on vaccines or medications.

His words of "root cause analysis" caught my attention, as this is what I do! I've known for a long time that this is what is needed to resolve health issues, but this is not the medical way that only "manages" the symptoms by hiding them with medications designed to suppress them, or surgeries to remove the symptom, but never to find and fix the causes. Because there was no training in root cause analysis in our education, and the same for Doctors, I've had to invent a process to help find all the root causes in each person. This helps me greatly with each client, and helps them to get better much more quickly and for long-term resolution of all symptoms and conditions.

Are we going heading toward oblivion, or should we start changing track to Utopia? His words.

Please see his full interview (12 minutes long) in this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Spau8UwRwZs

Stay healthy!

References:

Malhotra, A. (2022a). Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1. Journal of Insulin Resistance, 5 (1), a71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jir.v5i1.71

Malhotra, A. (2022b). Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 2. Journal of Insulin Resistance, 5 (1), a72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jir.v5i1.72

Youtube. (2022). Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Short Sharp Chat on his Vaccine Cost Benefit Paper! Retrieved 30th September 2022 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Spau8UwRwZs

0 Comments

The data, dangers and deaths of the Gardasil vaccine

16/6/2020

2 Comments

Introduction to the Gardasil vaccine
The Gardasil vaccine has been considered to be a breakthrough vaccine for women and women's health, marketed incorrectly and somewhat ironically as "the cervical cancer vaccine", allegedly for the prevention of cervical cancer. But does it really do this? No!
The Gardasil vaccine is not going to prevent cervical cancer, as it is an HPV vaccine - a vaccine against the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), a viral infection that is mostly, but not completely, a sexually-transmitted disease. With over 100 HPV viruses in the wild, can this vaccine really prevent an HPV infection or even cervical cancer? Again, no!

In 2007, the first Gardasil vaccine became available for public use, containing 4 strains of HPV - 2 which can cause genital warts, and 2 that may cause cervical cancer. Hence this version is now known as Gardasil 4. In 2018 a new Gardasil vaccine became available, with 9 strains of HPV viruses - still a long way short of the 100 possibles (WHO, 2019). The Gardasil vaccine was initially given only to girls of pre-teen or teenage years. In more recent times, teen boys are now recommended to get this vaccine too, as while they do not have a cervix, they too can carry the HPV vaccine and infect their sexual partners.

This article will look at what you are not being told about this vaccine, why it is one of the most dangerous vaccines to ever come onto the market, and why you need to read this and confirm this information, BEFORE you inject your children with it... This is called "informed consent" - the right to know what you and your children are being injected with in this medical procedure, of the risks vs benefits, side effects and possible adverse outcomes of which there are many, so that you can make up your own minds as to whether you wish to submit your children to this almost untested vaccine, and the right to decline based on being given this information. Yes Gardasil is "almost untested" is actually true - it wasn't tested in a true scientific way, as explained in these referenced facts below.

In this article and the following facts, I will refer to the original Gardasil vaccine as "Gardasil 4" to differentiate it from information from the new 2018 version of "Gardasil 9".

The following is a summary of key points in the history, testing, and use of the Gardasil vaccines, including side effects and severe adverse reactions:

The original Gardasil 4 vaccine was fast-tracked by US drug regulators, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after only a 6-month clinical test. Normally, new vaccines take many years to a decade or longer to undergo testing before approval is granted. This lack of testing will be explained further below, and is why it has many health effects.
There are over 100 types of the Human Papillomavirus (WHO, 2019), yet the original Gardasil vaccine only contained virus particles to 4 of them (FDA, 2018). The new Gardasil 9 still only contains 9 types of HPV particles.
In scientific testing of pharmaceuticals and vaccines, the manufacturer must compare the results of the test group (those receiving the drug or vaccine) against a control group (those receiving a placebo) - people who do not actually get the drug or vaccine. The placebo generally must be an inert substance, or one which does NOT have any effect, such as a sugar pill or a saline (salt) injection. Tests are normally done "blinded", meaning that the test subjects are not aware that they are getting the actual product being tested or the placebo, or "double-blinded", so the test subjects AND the researchers don't know who is getting what - to reduce any possible bias or manipulation of the data. In Gardasil 4, the manufacturer did NOT use an inert placebo, but one containing "Amorphous Aluminium Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate" (Seqirus, 2019), being the adjuvant (immune system stimulating) product used in the real vaccine! The same adjuvant was used in the vaccine AND in the control group. This was a deliberate attempt at manipulating the test results to show that the vaccine caused no more side effects than the placebo, and thus be deemed "safe". Despite the fact that the vaccine (and the placebo) both caused many side effects, and the manipulation of the scientific method used in the tests of this product, it was approved by the authorities. Read more below about the issues with this aluminium adjuvant.
Gardasil 4 contains 225 micrograms of aluminium as an adjuvant. Gardasil 9 has over DOUBLE this amount of neurotoxic aluminium at 500 micrograms (Sequiris, 2019).
The Gardasil vaccine protocol requires a series of 3 vaccinations. This is because the seroconversion, or development of HPV antibodies, is very low or non-existent in many recipients after the first shot. Hence a second and third shot are needed, to try and stimulate the immune system into producing HPV antibodies. Even after 3 Gardasil vaccinations, some recipients may not have developed any antibodies, and are therefore not immune to the virus.
Gardasil was tested by the manufacturer on females from 16 to 45 years old, and males from 16 to 26 years old. Yet the age group which the vaccine is given to is much younger - usually 12-15 years (Sequiris, 2019). In effect, those in this age group are given a vaccine which is UNTESTED for this population.
Even in the manufacturer's own testing of the vaccine, people still contracted HPV and some even developed cervical cancer to CIN III stage, which was serious enough to require surgery. Yet the manufacturer still claimed 100% efficacy for protection against the 4 HPV types (Seqirus, 2019).
Even the FDA (Food and Drug Administration, the US medicines regulator) says on their website that "Most people don't have any signs (of HPV infection). HPV may go away on its own-- without causing any health problems"! So why do we need this dangerous vaccine?! (FDA, 2018)
The manufacturer noted in their product information for Gardasil 4 that testing showed "Subjects who were already infected with one or more vaccine-related HPV types prior to vaccination were protected from clinical disease caused by the remaining vaccine HPV types" (Seqirus, 2019). This is your natural immune system doing its job! So actually contracting the HPV naturally actually stimulates immune protection against the other types! So again, why do we need this vaccine?
The manufacturer also noted that test subjects who already had HPV at the time of testing the vaccine "did not show a statistically significant reduction of CIN or AIS (cervical cancer) compared to placebo". They also said "GARDASIL has not been shown to protect against the diseases caused by every HPV type, and will not treat existing disease" (Seqirus, 2019).
People who are sensitive to any of the ingredients of Gardasil must not receive the vaccine. Those who develop symptoms of hypersensitivity after receiving a dose of Gardasil should not receive further doses (Seqirus, 2019).
Gardasil 4 was not been tested for whether or not it, or its ingredients, may cause cancer. It was also not tested for whether it may cause gene damage which can precede or subsequently cause cancer (Seqirus, 2019).
Gardasil 4 was tested for possible effects on fertility, in rats, without any effects. Gardasil 4 was also tested for fertility effects in women (Sequiris, 2019).
Gardasil 4 was not tested in pregnant women, and is not recommended for pregnant women. Despite scientific protocols banning pregnant women from being used as medical test subjects, Gardasil 4 was tested on pregnant women, which resulted in spontaneous abortions, miscarriages, late foetal death, and birth defects in those who received either the Gardasil 4 vaccine or the (aluminium-laced) placebo in 22-27% of cases known. Yet despite these results, the manufacturer claims, "there is no evidence to suggest that administration of GARDASIL adversely affects fertility, pregnancy, or infant outcomes" (Seqirus, 2019).
Gardasil 4 was not tested in humans for effects on lactation (breastfeeding). Studies in rats showed HPV antibodies in the offspring, so the vaccine does get transferred via breast milk (Seqirus, 2019).
Side effects of Gardasil 4 were only recorded within 15 days of the vaccination, and include pain and swelling around the injection site, headache, fever, nausea, dizziness and pain in extremities, difficulty breathing, joint pains, migraines.
Other Gardasil side effects and reactions include seizures, systemic pain, headaches, muscle pain and weakness, joint pain, paralysis, fatigue, numbness, low blood pressure, high heart rate, nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea, respiratory difficulties, asthma, menstrual disorders, psychological issues, hallucinations, cognitive impairments, memory difficulties, poor concentration, sleep disorders, and many more (Beppu et al., 2017).
Due to the number of adverse reactions and complaints about Gardasil, some countries (such as Japan) have stopped the Gardasil vaccination program (Beppu et al., 2017). Considering that other countries are having exactly the same adverse reactions and deaths, why haven't our health departments or drug regulators done the same?
Because Gardasil contains aluminium as an adjuvant, and aluminium having neurotoxic effects - being toxic and damaging to nerves, the nervous system and brain, Gardasil can cause nerve damage that results in chronic, severe and long-term side effects (Shaw & Petrik, 2009; Alleva, Rankin & Santucci, 1998; Shaw, Li & Tomljenovic, 2014).
Side effects to Gardasil can be varied and difficult to trace back to the one of the 3 shots needed.
The HPV virus is responsible for 70% of cervical cancers, so a vaccine against this virus isn't going to prevent all possible cases (New Scientist, 2006).
Ten people died from the original manufacturer's testing of the 2 Gardasil vaccines, 5 in each study. Many hundreds more have died from the Gardasil vaccination since it has been on the market. Death shortly after being vaccinated with Gardasil is a very real outcome. Hence why it is so important to be informed of this information, and having a right to decline this vaccine. Where there is a risk, there must be a choice. And an informed choice, which you have not been given, until now.
Before Gardasil 4 was introduced, rates of cervical cancer were already falling and were at their lowest levels ever recorded. This reduction of incidences of cervical cancer were due to increased sex education, promotion of condoms and other initiatives.
When Gardasil 4 was released in 2007, the rates of cervical cancer have INCREASED in Australia, the UK and other countries every year since. Gardasil has NOT reduced rates of cervical cancer at all! (Cancer Research UK, 2019)
Cancer Research UK announced an alarming 54% rise in cervical cancer among 24-29-year-olds, the first generation to receive the HPV jabs (Cancer Research UK, 2019). See the graph above, which shows 3 blue lines rising since 2007 for increased incidences in all these age groups...
Gardasil is known to cause several autoimmune conditions, including SLE (ie, lupus), ASIA syndrome (Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants), Multiple Sclerosis, Transverse Myelitis (an autoimmune neurological condition, similar to Multiple Sclerosis or paralysis), and others, in many cases very shortly after the vaccination (Vadalà, Poddighe, Laurino & Palmieri, 2017; Hu, 2019). The manufacturer's own product insert states that 2.2% of Gardasil 9 recipients and 3.3% of Gardasil 4 recipients developed NEW autoimmune medical conditions after the vaccine (Merck, 2020). See this statement taken from the USA product insert in the above image. Note that this statement does NOT appear in the Australian product information insert for Gardasil 9.
Gardasil can cause a little-mentioned adverse event condition called "ovarian failure", or in another word, "sterility" in females (Vadalà, Poddighe, Laurino & Palmieri, 2017). Affected girls and women won't be able to have children, as a direct result of the Gardasil vaccine. Hence if you (as a parent) are looking for more balanced and informed advice on Gardasil, and if you would like grandchildren, perhaps you should not recommend this vaccine to your children.
Vaccinations only give at best a temporary immunity to an HPV infection, of approximately 4 years (WebMD, 2020). After this time, when many adolescents are beginning to have sex, they may no longer be immune to HPV.
As Gardasil doesn't protect people from other sexually-transmitted infections, condoms and/or other contraceptives are still required. Condoms can reduce the risks of contracting HPV, genital warts and also cervical cancer, even without the vaccine (CDC, 2019).
In Australia there is a class action legal action taking place, for victims of the Gardasil vaccine who had severe adverse reactions. They have a Facebook page called "Gardasil Class Action Australia" if you would like to join and find out more.

Risk factors for contracting HPV and development of cervical cancer
Studies have shown that cervical cancer isn't only caused by the HPV virus. In fact, other causative factors must also occur for the development and progression of cervical cancer, especially:

an imbalance in the female hormones oestrogen and progesterone, and male hormone testosterone (Roura et al., 2016),
and an immune system dysfunction.

Other factors which can increase the risks of HPV and cervical cancer include (Burd, 2003):

Stress - very common around teenage and adolescent years, as stress causes a hormone imbalance, nutrient deficiencies and lowers immune system function
Nutrient deficiencies - for nutrients needed for immune system function, hormone production, growth and tissue repair
Lifestyle factors - drinking, smoking, drugs, insufficient sleep quantity or quality, low exercise
Medications - anti-inflammatories, NSAIDs, corticosteroids, and immuno-suppressives
Other infections - Cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus 6 and 7 and others
Oral contraceptives - long term use of these can be a significant factor in some studies.

If a female has any PMS symptoms, irregular periods, pain, cramping, sore breasts and other period symptoms, this indicates a hormone imbalance which should be assessed by a health practitioner (Nutritionist/Naturopath) as these symptoms can be cleared to reduce the risks of HPV and cervical cancer.

If these risk factors are identified and minimised, the risks of contracting HPV and it causing cervical cancer can be greatly reduced. All without a dangerous vaccine.

Independent investigation into Gardasil 9
In 2019, an independent team of Italian scientists from a group called Corvelva, started investigations into many common vaccines and their ingredients. They reviewed the Gardasil 9 vaccine ingredients from several batches, looking at the genetics of the RNA and DNA of the pathogens and other ingredients in the vaccine. They found the following (Corvelva, 2019):

The Gardasil 9 vaccine should contain antigens from 9 HPV viruses, but only 7 were actually found!
One of the missing HPV viruses (type 11) is commonly associated with cervical lesions, and another (type 58) is frequently associated with cervical cancer, hence no protection will be present for these 2 HPV strains.
There were 338 chemical contaminants detected which should not have been in the vaccine.
Various bacteria and yeasts from laboratory contamination were found in the Gardasil vaccine. In fact 54% of the DNA in this vaccine was from over 2 dozen other bacteria, parasite and yeast microbes which shouldn't be there!
Human and mouse DNA. This can increase the risk of autoimmune conditions by causing immune system dysfunction.
HPV virus DNA fragments - which are not intended parts of the vaccine per se. These are more contaminants which may be able to be integrated into your DNA and cause autoimmune reactions.
Molluscum contagiosum virus - a type of pox virus which causes skin blemishes and rashes, now quite common but not so much in the past. Now you know why there's more of it around...
Other retroviruses - which can become integrated into your DNA, can cause genetic mutations and cancers. This includes Human endogenous retrovirus K, L-BC virus, narnavirus, infectious equine anaemia virus, all which were found in this vaccine.
Mouse leukaemia virus - which causes a white blood cell cancer.

Clinical Observations
In my clinical practice, I have seen many female patients who have presented with very strange symptoms that no doctor was able to find the cause of, or diagnose, or be able to treat to reduce their symptoms. My detailed questioning in my initial consultations picked up on the onset of their symptoms, which was around the start of their teen years. On intuition initially and lately from experience, I asked what may have happened at that time, or whether they had the Gardasil vaccine. In many cases, they said the symptoms appeared shortly after this vaccine. Sure this is what is known as “anecdotal evidence” but the published evidence referenced here, and from many more studies since the Gardasil vaccine became available, confirms that these side effects and adverse reactions are from the vaccine and are very real. Because doctors don't try to trace the root causes of health conditions, they don't know that Gardasil has these reactions. This can lead to the patient suffering for years to a decade or longer before being diagnosed, if at all.

A very common ongoing adverse reaction I have seen in practice is a combination of chronic digestive complaints together with heart symptoms. The heart symptoms often present as a racing heart (tachycardia) which the person may or may not feel, or slow pulse (bradycardia), or arrhythmias (irregular heart beat), or having all of these - a fast heart beat becoming slow then racing again in quick succession. Heart rate testing can show a very wide range of beats, often a difference of 20+ beats per minute from low to high and low again when rested. Orthostatic testing of heart activity, of testing blood pressure and pulse when laying down, and immediately on standing, can show a steady BP but an even higher pulse rate on standing, and an overall difference in pulse of 30-40+ beats per minute. In teens who have these symptoms, many cannot tolerate any exercise, and some athletic teens have had to give up on their sports because of a sudden reduced performance after their Gardasil vaccination.

Other related symptoms from the heart dysfunction include frequent fainting and dizziness, headaches, weakness and fatigue, chest pain, shortness of breath, poor thinking or low memory and concentration (NHS, 2019).

Together with the irregular heart function, the same patients also have chronic digestive complaints, of pains, cramps, IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome), Ulcerative Colitis, hypochlorhydria (low stomach acid), chronic nausea, and other digestive complaints.

The digestive system is affected together with the cardiovascular system, as both systems are controlled by nerves, or more particularly, branches of the autonomic nervous system. The dysfunction of these systems can suggest a diagnosis of Dysautonomia, or "dysfunctional autonomic nervous system". The particular dysautonomia diagnosis I have found as a direct result of the Gardasil vaccination is Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome or POTS. In my investigations of many patients with Gardasil reactions, I have diagnosed POTS from their symptoms, history, and orthostatic testing of their blood pressure and heart rate. I have referred patients to their GP for a formal testing and diagnosis, only to be told that they don't know what POTS is or who to refer to.

Luckily, POTS can be diagnosed, treated and reversed, but not with medical interventions. It can be treated with nutritional medicine, lifestyle improvements, and herbal medicines.

I have also seen cases of cervical cancer being diagnosed in women who tested negative for HPV, but some had the Gardasil vaccine (which is known to cause cervical cancer). They also had hormone imbalances, and other factors like stress and nutrient deficiencies.

Conclusions
This document is a summary of many published studies into the Gardasil vaccine, information from the manufacturer, official government statistics, information from drug regulators, and from my own clinical experience with patients who have had many side affects, adverse reactions and chronic health conditions resulting from the Gardasil vaccine.

The Gardasil vaccine was not thoroughly tested, and not tested to accepted scientific protocols before being approved for use. Testing did not include using an inert placebo in the control group, which enabled the manufacturer to claim very little difference in side effects between the vaccine and an active placebo. This is an unconscionable act which was done deliberately to hide side effects in order to gain a fast approval. It also shows a lack of thoroughness of the drug regulators to not see this deliberate ploy of deception, prior to the vaccine being approved.

The Gardasil vaccine does not do what it claims to do - to reduce incidences of cervical cancer in women. In many countries, including in Australia, cervical cancer incidences have increased every year since Gardasil was introduced. And any protection from antibodies has only a short lasting effect of 4 years. After this time, there is no immunity to HPV. Gardasil has been shown in studies to actually cause cervical cancer. Gardasil simply does not work.

Gardasil causes many side effects, long-term health effects, and causes many deaths. One of its key reasons for this is the use of an aluminium adjuvant, used to heighten the immune response to producing antibodies, and many recipients still do not develop antibodies to HPV. Aluminium in the body is a neurotoxin - it damages nerves of the autonomic nervous system, to cause a great many symptoms and health issues, such as heart conditions and digestive conditions.

HPV alone is not the only cause of cervical cancer - an imbalance in male and female hormones and a dysfunctional immune system are also required factors for the development and progression of cervical cancer. Improve the immune system function and improve the hormone imbalance and cervical cancer can be prevented or reversed, without needing the dangerous Gardasil vaccine.

All parents of teenage children must be given full informed consent of all the risks of the Gardasil vaccine, including the chronic health conditions and reactions it can cause, including death. I do not see this information being given to parents or teens. Where there is a risk with a vaccine, and there are many with Gardasil, parents and teens must be fully informed and also allowed the right to decline this medical procedure. Luckily there are other options available to reduce the risks of this infection and to also reduce the risks of cervical cancer.

Schools around the country (and in other countries too) are the target for government-funded mass vaccination programs for the Gardasil vaccine. All Year 7s in Australia are rounded up and taken somewhere in the school for this shot. Often, letters or forms by concerned parents to not get this vaccine are ignored by teachers and the health department staff who simply assume that all children will get the vaccine. It is best to inform your children of the dangers to this vaccine, and keep them home on the allocated day, or to avoid it by hiding during the time it is being done.

(The full article and references list is avaiable as a PDF download at the bottom of this page)

References:

Alleva, E., Rankin, J., & Santucci, D. (1998). Neurobehavioral Alteration in Rodents Following Developmental Exposure to Aluminum. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 14 (1-2): 209-21. doi: 10.1177/074823379801400113.

Beppu, H., Minaguchi, M., Uchide, K., Kumamoto, K., Sekiguchi, M., & Yaju, Y. (2017). Lessons learnt in Japan from adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine: a medical ethics perspective. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 11 (2). Doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.021

Burd, E.M. (2003). Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 16 (1): 1–17. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.1.1-17.2003

Centre of Disease Control (CDC). (2020). Fact Sheet for Public Health Personnel. Retrieved 15th June 2020 from https://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.html#:~:text=Consistent%20and%20correct%20use%20of%20latex%20condoms%20reduces%20the%20risk,genital%20warts%20and%20cervical%20cancer).

Corvelva. (2019). Initial results on Gardasil 9 chemical composition. Retrieved 15th January 2019 from https://www.corvelva.it/en/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/initial-results-on-gardasil-9-chemical-composition.html

Hu, Y. (2018). Multiple Sclerosis Development in Two Teens After HPV Vaccination. Retrieved 15th June 2020 from https://www.neurologyadvisor.com/conference-highlights/actrims-2018/multiple-sclerosis-development-in-two-teens-after-hpv-vaccination/

Merck. (2020). Gardasil 9 product insert. Retrieved 15th June 2020 from https://www.fda.gov/media/90064/download

National Health Service (NHS). (2019). Postural tachycardia syndrome (PoTS). Retrieved 15th June 2020 from https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/postural-tachycardia-syndrome/

New Scientist. (2006). First cervical cancer vaccine is approved. Retrieved 15th June 2020 from https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9305-first-cervical-cancer-vaccine-is-approved/#:~:text=The%20first%20vaccine%20against%20cervical,month%20fast%2Dtrack%20clinical%20test.

Roura, E., Travier, N., Waterboer, T., de Sanjosé, S., Bosch, F.X., Pawlita, M., Pala, V., Weiderpass, E., Margall, N. Dillner, J., Gram, I.T., Tjønneland, A., Munk, C., Palli, D., Khaw, K., Overvad, K., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Mesrine, S., Fournier, A., Fortner, R.T., Ose, J.,Steffen, A., Trichopoulou, A., Lagiou, P., Orfanos, P., Masala, G., Tumino, R., Sacerdote, C., Polidoro, S., Mattiello, A., Lund, E., Peeters, P.H., Bueno-de-Mesquita, B., Quirós, J.R., Sánchez, M-J., Navarro, C., Barricarte, A., Larrañaga, N., Ekström, J., Lindquist,D., Idahl, A., Travis, R.C., Merritt, M.A., Gunter, M.J., Rinaldi, S., Tommasino, M., Franceschi, S., Riboli, E.,& Castellsagué, X. (2016). The Influence of Hormonal Factors on the Risk of Developing Cervical Cancer and Pre-Cancer: Results from the EPIC Cohort. PLoS One, 11 (1): e0147029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147029

Sequiris. (2019). Australian Product Information – GARDASIL® 9. Retrieved 15th June 2020 from https://labeling.seqirus.com/PI/AU/Gardasil/EN/Gardasil-9-Product-Information.pdf

Shaw, C.A., & Petrik, M.S. (2009). Aluminum Hydroxide Injections Lead to Motor Deficits and Motor Neuron Degeneration. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 103 (11); 1555-1562. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.05.019.

Shaw, C.A., Li, D. & Tomljenovic, L. (2014). Are There Negative CNS Impacts of Aluminum Adjuvants Used in Vaccines and Immunotherapy? Immunotherapy, 6 (10):1055-71. doi: 10.2217/imt.14.81.

Vadalà, M., Poddighe, D., Laurino, C., & Palmieri, B. (2017). Vaccination and autoimmune diseases: is prevention of adverse health effects on the horizon? European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine (EPMA), 8:295–311. Doi:10.1007/s13167-017-0101-y

WebMD. (2020). HPV, Cervical Cancer Vaccine: 15 Facts. Retrieved 15th June 2020 from https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/features/hpv-cervical-cancer-vaccine-15-facts#2

World Health Organisation (WHO). (2019). Human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer. Retrieved 15th June 2020 from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-papillomavirus-(hpv)-and-cervical-cancer#:~:text=There%20are%20more%20than%20100,the%20onset%20of%20sexual%20activity.

Download, save and share this article and references, or keep for your info!

gardasil_vaccine_article.pdf
File Size:	707 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

2 Comments

The Heart Foundation is heartless

2/6/2019

0 Comments

The Australian Heart Foundation recently launched a new ad campaign called "Heartless Words", which is exactly what their advert is and says everything about them as an organisation - heartless.

The advert includes lines such as "It's not just my heart I don't care about, it's yours", and "every time I told you I loved you I was lying - you are not my priority", which was quickly removed from the advert after a social media backlash.

Their ironic and idiotic campaign was supposed to highlight heart disease as being one of the major killers of Australians, with their statistics showing a heart disease related death occurring every 28 minutes.

The Heart Foundation appears to be blaming the public for this epidemic of heart disease, when really it's THEM who should be held accountable for this epidemic. The Heart Foundation and other government "health" organisations which have been pushing what they think is a "healthy" diet and lifestyle for decades, which most people would say they are doing, but it's actually making this epidemic WORSE.

The Heart Foundation's advice of low fat (and high carb) diets, with low salt, is actually exactly the opposite of what is current evidence-based nutrition advice for heart health! Their nutrition advice is 50 years out of date for what is current and correct nutrition science.

Another example of the Heart Foundation's incompetence was their "tick of approval" logo which could be applied to packaged and processed foods to show how "healthy" they were! People bought this concept for many years, until McDonald's added the "tick of approval" to a range of their products. We know that these junk foods are not healthy, so how was this possible? After some investigations, it was finally leaked that the "tick of approval" was simply a "licensing fee", with no actual scientific or nutritional investigations done on the food products which the tick was applied to. It was simply a marketing gimmick to trick the general public for a (initially) $50,000 per product, and later up to $300,000 per product. In other words, the Heart Foundation were deliberately lying to us all for years to mislead us about what foods were healthy for the heart, just for their financial benefit. With such policies, this organisation simply cannot be trusted to give any health advice.

A link to the Heart Foundation's heartless advert can be found here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkNwG60zfVk

My father had a sudden and severe heart attack at age 58. His father died at a similar age, also of a heart attack. Heart health and prevention of heart disease in myself, in my clients, and in the general public, is (pun intended) close to my heart.

I have written many articles on heart health, cholesterol, and many other factors related to heart health, all based on current scientific studies. I have also seen many clients with many different heart related symptoms, and I have treated them and seen amazing improvements in their health!

There are many factors which contribute to heart disease, most of which the Heart Foundation don't tell you about. And each person is different, so all the causative factors need to be investigated and treated. Heart disease is a serious issue and prevention is of course the best way to reduce incidences. If you or someone you know has a history of heart disease in their family, or has had heart issues, book in ASAP for a heart health check with me, and I will give the best possible advice to prevent heart disease and reduce symptoms!

0 Comments

Heart disease sign to look out for in self, friends and family

Renowned Cardiologist calls it a pandemic of misinformation

The data, dangers and deaths of the Gardasil vaccine

The Heart Foundation is heartless

COPYRIGHT

Archives

Categories