Ross Walter Nutritionist and Naturopath health articles and blog

COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers manipulate their clinical trial data to give false effectiveness % to get approval for use

1/6/2021

The 3 major COVID vaccine manufacturers in 2020 proudly and publicly self-flagellated over their alleged efficiencies of their vaccines at 94-95%. The media and medical industries and pro-sciencism fanatics went wild with the hopeful news that humanity would be saved from a deadly virus (that 99% of the population never got, and 99.9% of those who actually did get it survived anyway!). Hooray!

But never mind the skipped and fast-tracked clinical trials that would normally have taken 7-10 years to produce a vaccine (but questionable on the "safe and effective" descriptions).

How did the manufacturers come up with their approx 95% effectiveness rate? Briefly, they excluded unhealthy people - the very people that are being targeted for the vaccine - and also excluded pregnant women and children too. They gave half a group of healthy people the vaccine and half got a placebo. In the very short study period, the vaccinated group got a small number of infections, but the placebo group got a lot of infections. The ratio of placebo group infections to vaccinated group infections was about 95% : 5%. While this might seem statistically to be quite definitive and successful, the studies deliberately did not actually determine the "effectiveness" of the vaccine (Tenny & Hoffman, 2021):

- in producing antibodies - that wasn't checked for when it should have been
- in preventing a COVID infection - not tested for
- in reducing severity of symptoms - not checked
- in reducing visits to hospitals - not checked
- in preventing complications from the infection - not checked
- in or even reducing the death rate (or causing no deaths) - not checked.

How on earth then can the vaccines be 95% successful?! Simple, they aren't.
There is a concept in the statistics of clinical trials called Relative Risk - being the ratio of the risks for an event in the exposure group compared to those in the control or placebo group (Tenny & Hoffman, 2021). This is the sneaky technique that the vaccine manufacturers used in their trials to come up with 95% : 5% and therefore 95% "effective". But it's not...

However, the Relative Risk does not provide information about the true Absolute Risk of the event occurring. The Absolute Risk is the ACTUAL risk of the event happening, or success or effectiveness rate, and considers the whole population.

The attached pictures show a visual example of the difference between the Relative Risk vs the Absolute Risk for the Pfizer vaccine trial results.

A study published in the prestigious The Lancet medical journal (Olliaro, Torreele & Vaillant, 2021) investigated the statistics used by the major vaccine manufacturers in their trials, and instead of their sneaky Relative Risk or effectiveness %, they calculated their ACTUAL Absolute Risk percentage of each the vaccines. The true effectiveness of them are:

AstraZeneca - 1.3% (previously reported as 95% effective!)
Pfizer - 0.84% (previously reported as 95% effective!)
Moderna - 1.2% (previously reported as 94% effective!)
J&J - 1.2% (previously reported as 67% effective!)
Gamalaya (Russian Sputnik vaccine) - 0.93% (previously reported as 90% effective!)

Another technique used in the statistical analysis of vaccine clinical trials is the concept of the Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNV), being the number of people needed to be vaccinated to prevent ONE incidence of COVID-19 in this case. The NNV for these vaccines are:

AstraZeneca - 78
Pfizer - 117
Moderna - 76
J&J - 84
Gamalaya - 80.

That's a LOT of people who need to be vaccinated to prevent just one case of COVID-19.

It is important in your decision to decide getting the vaccine as to whether the effectiveness of a particular vaccine is worth the risk of the side effects. If you are not being told the true or correct effectiveness or even the actual risks, then it makes it an unrealistic and incomplete decision. In any case, YOU are an individual with your own personal risks, based on your health history, age, existing conditions, and other factors. It is impossible to work out your personal risk ratio. But you need the best information to help you decide (which is called "informed consent") - but you are not being given this information by the authorities or from your doctor.

What you have been told are lies and statistics, being one and the same thing. Statistics and science, sadly, can be manipulated by clever people to trick and confuse other people, such as in this situation. The authors of the Lancet study mentioned above, showed that the efficacy and effectiveness of vaccines is not as straightforward as it seems.

Be informed. Stay healthy!

References:
Olliaro, P., Torreele, E., & Vaillant, M. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room. The Lancet, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00069-0
Tenny, S. & Hoffman, M.R. (2021). Relative Risk. Retrieved 31st May 2021 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430824/

1 Comment

TGA update as of 23-May-2021 (part 2) - TGA says death rates were not as high as expected?!

1/6/2021

0 Comments

Following on from my previous post of today, I wanted to mention more from Australia's medicines regulator, the TGA, and their latest update of reported adverse events from the COVID vaccines.

The TGA say in their latest weekly update article some conflicting information (TGA, 2021), including:

Adverse events and deaths are reported to the DAEN database, but the TGA say that "the Information in the database also cannot be used to determine whether a medicine or vaccine is safe or not"!
the TGA say that many of the deaths (after the COVID vaccination) were in "frail elderly people (over 85 years old)"
but then also state of the vaccine death reports, "Most of these reports (93%) were for people 65 years of age and over, and over three quarters were 75 years of age and over. Many of the deaths relate to elderly aged-care residents"
and with the COVID vaccination "it is possible in frail older people that even relatively mild and expected adverse reactions following the vaccination may contribute to deterioration of an underlying illness"
"Each year in Australia, there are about 160,000 deaths, equating to 13,300 a month or 3050 each week. By the end of May that would equate to about 15,250 deaths from all causes. But we have had just ONE death from COVID-19... and 210 deaths from the vaccine
And of more concern - "The TGA reviews all deaths reported after vaccination and monitors for safety signals. Part of our analysis includes comparing expected natural death rates to observed death rates following immunisation. To date, the observed number of deaths reported after vaccination is actually less than the expected number of deaths". They were expecting MORE deaths after the vaccination, but they continue to downplay the vaccine as being the cause by saying this is coincidental?!

It would be more helpful to know if those who had adverse reactions or died, if they had any of the COVID vaccine doses beforehand. That might be in the unreleased TGA database.

Despite the TGA's statements of downplaying the risks of adverse reactions and deaths, the Queensland government dropped the AZ vaccine on the 20th May 2021 due to blood clotting issues (The West Australian, 2021).

Approximately 25 other countries have banned or suspended the AZ vaccine because of deaths and clotting issues. When will the TGA wake up and investigate all these reports properly?

Reference:
Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine weekly safety report - 27-05-2021. Retrieved 30th May 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/periodic/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-safety-report-27-05-2021

The West Australian. (2021). Qld govt abandons AZ for Pfizer, Moderna. Retrieved 31st May 2021 from https://thewest.com.au/news/coronavirus/pm-not-briefed-on-quarantine-qld-premier-c-2885476

0 Comments

TGA Update as of 23-May-2021 shows many more deaths from the covid-19 vaccines than deaths from the virus in Australia

1/6/2021

0 Comments

Australia's medicines regulator, the TGA, has been publishing a weekly summary report on adverse events from the COVID vaccines. Because of their policies, they have not been publishing all the details of any adverse side effects from the vaccines, not until 3 months after the event.

This week they did publish a little more of their data, which has been summarised in the attached pic...

Since the COVID-19 vaccines started in Australia, there have been (TGA, 2021):

1 death from COVID-19
210 deaths from the COVID-19 vaccine
22,031 adverse events reported from the vaccine.

Considering that not every case of death or adverse reaction gets officially reported, these numbers are likely to be MUCH higher in reality.

In just the last week, another 9 reports of blood clotting issues which can potentially be fatal, and 1609 adverse reactions.

The TGA also reported that in an average year 160,000 people in Australia die, or 13,500 per month, or 3,050 per week. As of end-May, we would have 15,250 deaths in Australia. Out of those estimated 15,250 deaths, we've had 1, just ONE, death from COVID-19 all year, but 210 from the vaccine. The "treatment" or "cure" is supposed to be safer than the disease or infection, but that is certainly not the case here.

With the survival rate of COVID-19 being well over 99%, I will continue to support my immune system to do what it is supposed to - find and fight every infection that I may come in contact with...

Is the risk of an untested and experimental vaccine worth it? These numbers make it clear.

Stay healthy!

Reference:
Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine weekly safety report - 27-05-2021. Retrieved 30th May 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/periodic/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-safety-report-27-05-2021

0 Comments

Facebook to no longer censor posts suggesting that the coronavirus was man-made

1/6/2021

0 Comments

I reported very early in 2020 of a pre-published scientific study that proposed that the SARS-2 coronavirus was likely NOT of a natural origin and more likely was man-made. The authors of the study looked at the genetic sequence of the coronavirus and found that it was mostly comprised of genes from the earlier SARS virus, but also had several other sequences from the HIV virus not found in other coronaviruses. Those HIV sequences couldn't have just appeared or mutated from other coronaviruses. The authors of this study were hounded and ridiculed, and were forced to retract their study under pressure. Facebook then started their censorship of posts on this topic (such as mine) with their unscientific "fact-checking" processes, or deleting such posts.

Within a few months, another 6 published studies also investigated the coronavirus genetics and reported that the virus was not and could not have originated naturally - that it was indeed man-made. I published articles on these too, with more censorship from FB to hide this information.

In early February 2021, nearly 12 months after the first study appeared questioning the natural origins of the coronavirus, Facebook reaffirmed their policy of fact-checking and removing "false claims" related to the coronavirus including that it was "man-made or manufactured".

But in a new policy update on 26th May 2021, Facebook's Vice President of Integrity (a little ironic department in FB!) published an announcement that they will no longer remove posts that suggest that the coronavirus was man-made! (Facebook, 2021)

To all the denialists out there, including my own colleagues, who abused me and said I was spreading fear and conspiracy theories - I TOLD YOU SO...

Facebook said "In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of COVID-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured from our apps".

If this critical piece of news is now seen as "not fake news" or "an accepted truth", what else in this saga that has been suppressed, censored or hidden actually true also? Or another thought, if the coronavirus WAS man-made, then WHY and for what purpose? I guess we will be finding out more truths soon!

I wonder what other topics they will reverse their "fact-checking" on? Let's hope they return to being a social media platform again, not a government- and corporate-sponsored propaganda and censorship platform. The same goes to mainstream media and news outlets - stop censoring doctors, medical experts and scientists, just because they publish information that goes against the government narrative.

Fact-check this FB!

And stay healthy!

References:
Facebook. (2021). An Update on Our Work to Keep People Informed and Limit Misinformation About COVID-19. Retrieved 29th May 2021 from https://about.fb.com/news/2020/04/covid-19-misinfo-update/

0 Comments

Research study finds plastic, heavy metals & more in rice

11/5/2021

0 Comments

A very recent Australian study has been published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials on the finding of high concentrations of plastic particles in packaged rice. Having rice contaminated with plastics is oviously not going to be good or healthy for you.

Some key points from this study (Dessì et al, 2021):

• The researchers found micro- and nano-sized plastic contaminants in EVERY rice product, regardless of the type of rice (jasmine, basmati, brown, or other rice type) or if the rice was organic or not, or where the rice was grown
• The amount of plastic in the rice wasn't related to the product being packaged in plastic or whether it was in paper packaging - hence the contamination is not coming from its own packaging but from other sources
• Instant or pre-cooked rice designed to be quickly heated in the microwave oven contained 3-6 times as much plastic contaminants as all other dried rice products
• Washing or rinsing rice before cooking DOES reduce the amount of plastic contaminants significantly, by approximately 20-40%, but not completely
• Plastics are often contaminated with additive chemicals such as BPA and phthalates (oestrogen mimicking chemical, known to cause male and female hormone imbalances), flame retardants, and others which have negative health effects. Heating the plastic increases the release of these chemicals into the food, which you don't want.

As a result of this study, the researchers recommend that store-bought rice be washed or rinsed before being cooked, and avoid the pre-cooked microwavable rice which had MUCH higher concentrations of plastic contaminants.

Rice is also contamined with other things, including agricultural chemicals and heavy metals. Rice has a tendency to absorb more arsenic than other crops. This is concentrated more in the outer layers of the rice - such as in "brown rice", hence one of several reasons why brown rice should be avoided.

The researchers also noted that plastic contaminants have also been found in other foods - honey, beer, meat (packaged on plastic trays), milk, sugar, table salt, bottled water, energy drinks, soft drinks, teas, and other sources.

We have been made aware of how damaging plastics are to the environment and animals, but we should also now be aware that plastics are in many of our foods - mostly in processed and packaged foods. There will be much less contamination of fresh foods which we should be eating more of!

With rice being a staple food for over 50% of the world's population, the findings in this study are a concern. This article is also a reminder to not use plastic water bottles or food containers, especially if the temperature rises (such as when heated or exposed to hot food or the sun)- as more chemicals leach from the plastic into your food. This causes many adverse health effects.

Reference:
Dessì, C., Okoffo , E.D., O’Brien, J.W., Gallen, M., Samanipour, S., Kaserzon, S., Rauert, C., Wang, X., & Thomas, K.V. (2021). Plastics contamination of store-bought rice. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 416, 125778. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125778

0 Comments

Why the COVID vaccines will not enable freedom or normality again

2/5/2021

0 Comments

What if someone offered you a birth control shot, but after taking it:

• you can still get pregnant
• you can still get others pregnant
• you still needed to wear a condom or take a contraceptive pill
• or you might become infertile
• or you might suffer a serious adverse reaction
• or you might die...

Would you still take that shot? Would you allow your family, parents, or children to get this shot?

Are there better and safer alternatives?

Obviously this post is an analogy about the COVID vaxes, and similar questions need to be asked, and personal research needs to be done before taking any such action. Because full informed consent, body autonomy, and personal choice are not being given or allowed at the moment.

Stay healthy.

0 Comments

Is it worth dying for?

2/5/2021

0 Comments

This is a tragic real story of what can happen with pharmaceutical companies testing new drugs on real people.

In 2006, a drug company developed a new medication for the treatment of cancers, code-named as "TGN1412". Pre-clinical studies, especially on animals (rodents and monkeys) showed no toxic responses, so the company moved to human trials on 6 healthy male volunteers. Two people were in the control group and 4 received the medication.

Within about 1 hour, those who got the medication were having severe allergy-like reactions, which resulted in headaches, nausea, vomiting, difficulty breathing, high fever, muscle pain, organ failure, low blood pressure and blood clotting symptoms... Sound familiar?!

All volunteers were transferred to intensive care hospitals , where one person died, and others lost limbs from clotting issues or permanent organ damage, or other major health complications.

This particular medical trial resulted in the European Medicines Agency to change the guidelines for testing drugs in humans. The tragic events in this trial serve as a reminder that animal trials do not confirm safety in humans, or that becoming a volunteer for medical trials for new and experimental medications or vaccines is not worth risking your life for...

Despite the dangers and effects of the medication, another company is continuing research on this medication.

This story is relevant for a couple of reasons:
1) The major manufacturers of the recent un-named vaccines skipped clinical trials on animals and went straight into testing on human volunteers with simultaneous production of their vaccines
2) Animal trails often find issues with the medications or vaccines before they are tested on humans, but humans are NOT the same as rats or monkeys, with different physiological and biochemical responses. Hence a medication or vaccine which appears to work in animals may not in humans
3) The current vaccine manufacturers have documented their "Phase 3 clinical trials" as still being current, until 2022 or 2023... meaning that the population who are getting their vaccines ARE their guinea pigs - THEY are the clinical trial.

This true situation has resulted in a movie (called "The Facility") being loosely based on what happened. A BBC documentary on this tragic story is also available to watch.

Stay healthy. Don't mess with nature - your immune system knows what to do!

References:
Here's more on the story - https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/how-six-fit-young-men-9860903

Many studies on the drug, called "TGN1412" can be found here:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/tgn1412

0 Comments

Authorities find links to AZ vaccine causing blood clots and platelet issues, and increased risks of these in women

10/4/2021

0 Comments

More and more incidences of post-COVID-19 vaccine side effects are being reported in international adverse events databases, particularly of blood clotting issues, but many other issues, including deaths...

The authorities keep saying that there is no link to the vaccine, until very recently (9th April 2021) with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) reporting links between the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and the blood clots and low platelet counts in many people who have had this vaccine (TGA, 2021). These findings fully justify the concerns that many countries (approximately 25) who have either banned, suspended or restricted the use of the AZ vaccine. Perhaps, based on the new findings and new research, the restrictions should be expanded or even having the AZ vaccine completely banned, to protect everyone from this and other side effects - which are much higher than the other COVID-19 vaccines.

The TGA also notes that while any specific links to gender are not known, but there have been many more adverse clotting events in women than men. This is a concern as there are more female health-care workers (TGA, 2021).

The Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) has recently (8th April 2021) changed its recommendation for the AZ vaccine to be used in adults under 50 years of age, because of the increasing risks of clotting issues in older adults.

The TGA recommends reporting any side effects from the AZ or other vaccines to your country's adverse events database, so these issues can be monitored and investigated. If you know of anyone who has any side effects from any of the COVID-19 vaccines, make sure they report the issues to their country's adverse events register.

References:

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021). AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 vaccine: Updated safety advisory – rare and unusual blood clotting syndrome (thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia). Retrieved 9th April 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/astrazeneca-chadox1-s-covid-19-vaccine

0 Comments

New study finds no benefit from wearing masks for preventing coronavirus infection, but they cause many issues

9/4/2021

0 Comments

The heavily debated topic of wearing masks as a preventative against the SARS-2 coronavirus is still an issue. On one hand it may appear to the media, the general public and politicians that wearing of masks makes sense to reducing your risks of this or other respiratory infections. But many published studies actually show that the wearing of masks has very limited scientific evidence, despite what you may have heard in the media or from health authorities.

A new study published in January 2021 has investigated and summarised many other studies on the use of different types of masks (or no masks) on the prevention of transmission of the SARS-2 coronavirus, as well as the health risks and complications that the wearing of masks may cause (Vainshelboim, 2021). This new study is very appropriate, with many people currently affected by governmental mask mandates.

Some interesting points in this new study, found these observations (which were found in other studies too):

N95 respirator masks are tight-fitting commercial masks which have a filter for the incoming air to reduce exposure to infectious or damaging particles. The filter makes breathing more difficult. However N95 respirator masks offer NO protection to other people, if the wearer has any respiratory infection, as there is no filter on exhaled breath, hence can INCREASE the transmission of infections to others!
Surgical masks are designed to be used in STERILE environments (such as in hospitals) more as a barrier against splashes, spit and other body fluids to prevent contaminating the wearer. As they are very loose fitting, they offer very little protection from infections to other people
Fabric and cloth masks offer the most minimal protection or filtration
The majority of COVID deaths were in the elderly with chronic health conditions already. The SARS-2 virus may exacerbate existing conditions but rarely causes death by itself
Masks can restrict breathing, to cause hypoxemia (low oxygen pressure in the blood), hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide in the blood), increased respiratory complications, self-contamination (from repeated touching of surfaces and the mask, or breathing in contaminated air), and exacerbation of existing chronic conditions
Conversely, increasing breathing and especially oxygen intake levels has been used for medical treatments for hospitalised patients and especially those with COVID-19 symptoms
Mild or moderate hypoxemia or hypercapnia from wearing masks can change energy metabolism, decrease pH levels (towards acidic) in cells and blood, and cause toxicity, oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, immunosuppression (poor immune function, at a time you really need it working!), and health deterioration
Severe hypoxemia and hypercapnia can cause cardiopulmonary and neurological conditions, including heart attacks, arrhythmias, dizziness, high or low blood pressure, fainting, fatigue, headaches, and other issues including death
Using surgical masks for a longer time (60 mins) can reduce the blood oxygen saturation by more than 1%
Masks are ineffective at blocking viral particles that are much smaller than the gaps in the threads of the masks, and filtration of masks is very poor
Breathing through masks increases the temperature and humidity of the mask and respiratory tracts, causing the release of toxic chemicals from the mask's materials, increasing the risks of breathing in other pathogens and toxic contaminants
There have been studies looking at the effects that masks have on reducing transmission or infectivity between people infected with SARS-2. There was no difference in transmission rates between those who wore masks or not.
Another study found no transmissions from an asymptomatic SARS-2 carrier to 445 others, even in a shared quarantine space for an average of 4-5 days
Even amongst healthcare workers, masks and respirators were not effective against transmission of viral infections, in many studies
One RCT study looking at cloth masks found a 13-times higher risk of flu-like illness, compared to those wearing a surgical mask or no mask
More studies comparing N95 respirators and surgical masks found no reduction in virus transmissions in the community (even with over 33,000 participants)
The World Health Organisation (WHO) changed their guidance on wearing masks from early 2020 to say that "masks were not required as no evidence was available for their benefit", to a few months later say that even cloth masks "can prevent the infected wearer transmitting the virus to others, and offer protection to the HEALTHY wearer against infection", but based on limited or no evidence
The CDC has stated that only people with symptoms should consider wearing a mask, and in asymptomatic people the wearing of masks was not recommended
There are many possible physical facial harms to the wearer of masks, such as lesions, dermatitis, worsening acne, and other discomfort
People with mental health disorders, developmental disabilities, hearing problems, or living in humid environments, children, or those with respiratory conditions, are at SIGNIFICANT health risk for complications and harm
Wearing of masks remove self-identity and affects social interactions and relationships, resulting in poor mental and physical health
Wearing of masks was associated with a 50% increase in mortality due to depression, anxiety, and suicide
The fear associated with the pandemic and effects of wearing masks activates the "flight or fight" response of higher cortisol (stress hormone) and its effects on the body - reduced brain function, and greatly reduced immune system function, being the natural and fundamental body system that is needed at this time to protect you from infections or to fight them
The long-term consequences of wearing masks can be severe and devastating, as a result of physiological and psychological stresses and the hypoxemia and hypercapnia effects - including increased risks of heart disease and cancers, due to effects on the blood and a reduced function of the immune system.

The study concludes with the following points:

Scientific evidence is lacking for the wearing of masks to reduce mortality or morbidity from infectious or viral diseases including the SARS-2 coronavirus
Both medical and non-medical masks are ineffective to reduce human-to-human transmission and infectivity of SARS-2 and COVID-19
Wearing of masks has adverse physiological and psychological effects
Long-term consequences of wearing of masks on health are severely detrimental.

Local, state and federal governments, businesses and companies, public health advisors, doctors, and other healthcare practitioners MUST give quality advice based on the scientific evidence, NOT on what may appear to be common sense (that the wearing of masks in this alleged pandemic may appear to be). There is very little scientific evidence (or none that I have seen) that shows that wearing of any type of mask offers protection to the wearer or to others, for the prevention of transmission of viral respiratory infections, including the SARS-2 coronavirus.

All health authorities should reconsider the mask mandates in light of this study, and many others. There are other better ways to reduce the risks of this virus, and improve immune system function and overall health, to prevent infections or protect you from them. That is what they have NOT done thus far in this pandemic and this has to change.

Sadly you can't quote this and other studies as a reason to not wear a mask. But you can and should use the available medical exemptions to not wear one, especially for children, or those with respiratory conditions, mental health conditions, disabilities, or other valid reasons.

Stay healthy!

References:
Vainshelboim, B. (2021). Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis. Medical Hypotheses, 146, 110411. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110411

0 Comments

Genocide of the elderly (Senicide/geronticide) - Part 1

9/4/2021

0 Comments

The three greatest risk factors of mortality from the coronavirus are:
1. Older age
2. Having more than one chronic health condition
3. Having a low functioning immune system.

In the elderly, all of these risk factors are very common. Hence why they have the highest morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.

It should be common sense then to reduce mortality of those at risk, that public health advice would be to help reduce the risks to people in these groups. But what advice have the authorities given to them:
1. Wash your hands
2. Stay away from others
3. Wear a mask (after months of saying "don't wear a mask").

And that's it. Pathetic.

It is well known that the elderly or those with many chronic health conditions have a lot of factors affecting their health such as:
• Nutrient deficiencies - from a poor diet
• Vitamin D deficiency - a MASSIVE problem, as it hugely reduces immune system function (Arnljots, Thorn, Elm, Moore & Sundvall, 2017)
• Reduced organ function
• Stress, loneliness, loss of partners or friends, and limited contact with family during COVID restrictions
• Medications - many medications reduce immune system function or cause adverse side effects.

The elderly, and those in aged care or nursing homes need the most support and beneficial preventatives and treatments. They are our most vulnerable people.

The elderly frequently suffer from malnutrition (up to 57%), deficiencies of multiple nutrients (of protein, water, vitamin D, B-vitamins, and more. These will affect their physical and mental health, and especially the function of their immune system. The elderly are more likely to die from infections than younger age groups. Nutrient support through improved dietary advice or supplementation CAN improve their nutritional status and immune system function (Wells & Dumbrell, 2006).

But never once has any Western government throughout this pandemic given any true and proven recommendations to the elderly, to improve their immune system function with preventions or treatments - such as very simple, cheap and very effective interventions of vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc etc. These treatments have been proven effective in multiple studies (Wells & Dumbrell, 2006).

Instead, the governments of the world have kept the elderly locked up, hidden from view and contact from their family. This doesn't help their mental or physical health.

Governments, health departments, and public health officials, and perhaps owners of aged care and nursing homes, have ignored the health of the elderly in this pandemic. They have NOT addressed the physical or mental health of them, or really ANYONE, in this pandemic, nor their nutritional status or immune system function to prevent or treat any respiratory infection. They could have done a LOT more to help. The government and health authorities have caused more deaths in the pandemic by their lack of action. They have contributed to the Genocide of the Elderly and those with chronic health issues. Genocide of the elderly is also called Senicide or Geronticide.

There is a lot more that can be done to protect our elderly. If the authorities are not doing anything, then YOU can.

I will expand on this more in my next article on this topic...

References:
Arnljots, R., Thorn, J., Elm, M., Moore, M., & Sundvall, P-D. (2017). Vitamin D deficiency was common among nursing home residents and associated with dementia: a cross sectional study of 545 Swedish nursing home residents. BMC Geriatrics, 17 (229).
Wells, J.L. & Dumbrell, A.C. (2006). Nutrition and Aging: Assessment and Treatment of Compromised Nutritional Status in Frail Elderly Patients. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 1 (1): 67–79. doi: 10.2147/ciia.2006.1.1.67

0 Comments

COVID check-in app mandatory in hospitality venues (Big Brother is watching you)

9/4/2021

0 Comments

The rona madness in Queensland continues... So we got down to only one new case at the end of the 3-day lockdown period, and the state government relaxed the restrictions to end the lockdown, except that the whole state still needs to wear a mask for another 2 weeks!

Then the Qld government quietly updates their website on the use of its new "Check In Qld" COVID-safe app, used to make it easier and quicker when checking into cafes, restaurants, pubs, businesses and other services using QR codes for contact tracing purposes.

The Qld government have now made the use of the app MANDATORY for all hospitality businesses from May 1st...

Other Aus states have their own similar apps - NSW, WA, and the ACT.

Previously the app was optional and being promoted as a single sign-on with your personal details once, and you just scan the business's QR code and it registers you at that location at that date and time. Now all hospitality businesses MUST use the app for contact tracing. If a customer doesn't have a compatible mobile phone, or doesn't want to use the app, the business must provide alternative options for getting all their contact details (Queensland Government, 2021).

If this app were truly about the health and safety of everyone during the times of COVID, it wouldn't only be used for hospitality businesses! But then again, such a widespread system will be invasive, restrictive, and abused by the government for more than what it is intended for.

The introduction of these new state government tracing apps also shows how pathetic the Federal government's COVID-Safe app is at contact tracing, yet the government wants you to now use BOTH systems together.

The penalties for a business not using the "Check in Qld" app are severe - if a business fails to register for the app by May 1st or doesn't implement this new tracing app, they face a fine of $13,345 or a 6 month holiday in prison (ABC News, 2021).

Queensland Council for Civil Liberties are concerned by the implementation of the app and the lack of laws around the privacy of the data collected, limiting the use or access of the data (such as to police without warrants), or how long the data will be kept before being destroyed. Police in other countries using similar apps have used the data for investigative purposes, which is a huge privacy issue (ABC News, 2021). Also missing from the Qld Gov website is when will the app no longer be needed.

Will the app be used for more contact tracking and tracing at other businesses and services? Yes, the government have confirmed that the app will be used in the future for libraries, banks, SCHOOLS, cinemas, petrol stations, tourism, entertainment venues, and more (ABC News, 2021).

Is this George Orwell's 1984? Big Brother? Or the start of China's social credit system being implemented here? (Constant tracking and monitoring of everyone, facial recognition cameras and software, logging in everywhere, and monitoring and analysis of every conversation, text, email, and social media post, because the government sees you as a threat). Is this really what you want?

The "Check-in Qld" system is too easily broken if people were to not enter their true contact details into the app for privacy reasons... The more the government demand these actions over our lives, the less likely that people will abide by the "rules".

This app and other government interventions are not about improving the health and safety of the population in the alleged pandemic. It's not about health when they are ignoring the most obvious aspects of your immune system, reducing the risks of infections, and anything else that affects your health. This is about control and monitoring of everyone.

Trust not the government.

References:
ABC News. (2021) Check-in Queensland COVID app to be mandatory from May. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/.../qld-covid.../100041132

Queensland Government. (2021). Check In Qld app. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from https://www.covid19.qld.gov.au/check-in-qld

0 Comments

Mortality rates in Australia in 2020 were far lower than in previous years. What pandemic?

9/4/2021

0 Comments

The official annual death rates in Australia for 2020 have just been released. The deaths during 2020, the start of the coronavirus pandemic, were a little surprising, as they have actually been much lower than in previous years.
Here's a comparison of the past 5 years data (ABS, 2021a):

Year 2017 deaths: 160,909
Year 2018 deaths: 158,493
Year 2019 deaths: 169,301
Year 2020 deaths: 141,116

(28,000 deaths LESS in 2020 than from 2019)

Some official comments on the 2020 death statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS, 2021a) include:

• 141,116 doctor certified deaths in 2020
• Some substantial differences in death numbers for some causes or diseases, including from cancer and diabetes
• Deaths due to respiratory disease were 16.2% LOWER than historical averages, for both chronic and acute respiratory diseases
• Influenza and pneumonia (a complication of flu and COVID-19) were 36% LOWER than historical averages
• Deaths due to heart diseases were below average for every month of 2020, and 10.7% LOWER than previous averages
• Deaths due to cancer, dementia and diabetes were HIGHER by 4%, 7.3% and 9.1%, no doubt due to reduced hospital access or changes in care due to COVID-19 restrictions
• The year 2020 had the LOWEST death rate of every year since 2009 (ABS, 2021b).

The Australian Government and media: "Nothing to see here..."

(I am reminded of the old "Charter boat" TV advert, for Australians who remember this?! Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UadHCpSjyew)

Stay healthy!

References:
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021a). Provisional Mortality Statistics. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from https://www.abs.gov.au/.../provisional.../jan-dec-2020

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021b). Deaths, Year of registration, Summary data, Sex, States, Territories and Australia. Retrieved 1st April 2021 from http://stat.data.abs.gov.au/Index.aspx...

0 Comments

Controversial or coincidental extension to Queensland's coronavirus state of emergency?

9/4/2021

0 Comments

Is it just a coincidence (no, not really, it never is a coincidence) that the Qld coronavirus pandemic "state of emergency" which was declared on 29th January 2020 was to expire on 31st March 2021... that is tomorrow, or 2 days after the latest "outbreak"?!

Now as a result of the latest announcement and lockdowns, the government can extend their emergency powers to continue this scam for longer.

I will repeat - the more people get tested for the coronavirus, the more cases they will find, from people who have no symptoms (and who never get any) because the PCR test is inaccurate and up to 80% of positive results are found to be negative on a retest. That is, 80% of positive results are "false positives", which the fear-mongering government and media will use against everyone to bring about more restrictions and lockdowns. I predicted this would happen as a result of their fear campaign to get more people tested. As a result, just 4 alleged cases amongst 5 million people in a small part of the state, has now affected everyone.

This will all end when 1) we stop getting tested, and 2) stop believing what the government and media are telling you, and 3) you stop letting them get away with this control of your life.

Here's the details of the Qld Government's emergency powers and dates:
justiceconnect.org.au/resources/how-the-queensland-governments-emergency-restrictions-on-covid-19-work/

0 Comments

Brisbane coronavirus outbreak lockdown and masking

9/4/2021

0 Comments

Based on just 4 alleged coronavirus cases here in Brisbane, the city has been locked down - schools closed, businesses shut, people told to stay at home, and masks mandated for the WHOLE STATE!

It is utterly ridiculous to make the whole state of 5 million people over 1.8 million square kilometres and stretching 7000km from the southern border to the top, to wear a mask based on 4 cases! There is NO science to justify this, and plenty of quality studies showing wearing of masks does nothing to stop the spread of respiratory infections or even COVID.

A reminder that despite the mask mandate, it is still dangerous for some people to wear a mask, and hence some people cannot wear a mask. So if you see someone without a mask, please don't launch into a tirade of abuse, but respect their reasons that you know NOTHING about. Leave them be.

In any case, if you are wearing a mask and someone else isn't, you are protected right?! It's nothing to do with you why they aren't wearing one. People are not going to deliberately not wear a mask, knowing the abuse that some people may likely give them.

There are some people exempted from wearing a mask:
1) Children 12 years or younger
2) Those with medically exempt conditions - often respiratory conditions, facial or skin conditions, but also mental health conditions, disabilities (ie deafness or need to communicate with someone with a disability), or many other conditions.

You also do not need proof for not wearing a mask. Some GPs can write a medical certificate letter for this exemption, but it is not needed, according to the Qld Health website.

Police or security or other staff may ask why you aren't wearing a mask, so just say "I have a valid medical exemption for not wearing one, thank you.". They may push their luck and ask for what your exemption is or for proof of the exemption. If you have a medical certificate for exemption, then show them. Even though proof of this is not required (again, according to the Qld Health website) showing proof can diffuse the situation more quickly. However police or security or other staff cannot ask you what your health issue is - that is private between you and your doctors. It is a medical privacy issue, and the reason why medical records are kept under tight security with access only to those who are legally allowed to see them. If asked, just say "I am under no legal obligation to tell you of my medical issues, which is covered by the Commonwealth Privacy Act of 1988".

If you are denied access to shops or services for not wearing a mask or any "No mask, no entry" signs, as there are many people who are misinformed on this issue, ask to speak to their manager. Remind them that refusing access to someone with a health issue and who has a legally valid exemption is breaking the law (Disability Discrimination Act of 1992) and substantial fines and penalties can apply to the person preventing access and to the business or organisation.

If you still get denied access to businesses or organisations or if you feel you are discriminated against for not wearing a mask, report them to the Human Rights Advocates who will contact the business and get them to change their policies based on law: www.humanrightsadvocates.com.au

For more information and links to the Qld Health website on the exemptions, or the other laws mentioned here, please refer to the attached document, or print this and take with you:

drive.google.com/file/d/1SsQeWm8Q0ZREdEGFP8BIRzR1i3hGCYVT/view?fbclid=IwAR0DgFK55vc_XoW-spiyams9TSXdRHssXhVkHfekSopJwKmM3ni_jW6gM6c

0 Comments

The European medicines regulator covered up issues with the Pfizer mRNA covid-19 vaccine

9/4/2021

0 Comments

While most of the news on the COVID-19 vaccines of late has been on the 25-or-more countries who have suspended their use of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine due to serious adverse events and deaths, the alternative Pfizer vaccine hasn't exactly been doing much better. And worse, the medicines regulators, who are supposed to protect the public, have been covering this up...

The issues of the Pfizer COVID vaccine haven't officially been made public, as the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the medicines regulator of the European Union, concealed the issues together with Pfizer, that many of their batches were defective and contained unstable or less mRNA than they should have, which may have resulted in a less-effective vaccine that might not provide any protection from the virus. In essence, the EU drug regulator was protecting the Pfizer pharmaceutical company (and shareholders) from any adverse news leaking that their product may not work... instead of protecting the people of Europe.

News of the EMA/Pfizer cover-up only broke when hackers accessed the EMA servers in December 2020 and took 40Mb of data, emails, and files and released them to the dark web and to journalists and scientists. One of those journalists published an article in the prestigious British Medical Journal (BMJ) to highlight the issues with the Pfizer quality standards, and the subsequent cover-up by Pfizer and the EMA.

The leaked documented showed the following issues with the Pfizer COVID vaccine:

The mRNA sequences were not all complete - with differences in integrity of the mRNA across batches varying by 55-78%, or 22-45% of them were defective
If a mRNA protein is in ANY way damaged or not 100% accurate, it will not work to help a cell to product the correct spike protein that triggers an immune response or antibodies to protect you from the coronavirus
Alternatively, the damaged mRNA in the Pfizer vaccines can still get into cells, and the cells may still use the mRNA to produce a protein, but a damaged one which can cause ANY effect or damage to your health
The BMJ asked all COVID mRNA vaccine manufacturers what is their % of mRNA are intact - none have responded
The EMA knew as early as November 2020 that Pfizer's factories were already producing vaccine batches that did not meet their quality specifications (due to the irregular or damaged mRNA)
The EMA was concerned enough on 23rd November 2020 by the findings that they issued two "major objections" to Pfizer along with other questions to resolve their vaccine production quality issues. Subsequent communications between the EMA and Pfizer on 25th November (2 days later), but unclear as to what testing was done, showed a slight improvement in quality at approximately 70-75% intact mRNA. This still means 25-30% incomplete or damaged mRNA in Pfizer's batches
It was also noted that the medicines regulators do not have any guidelines or standards for making sure the new mRNA vaccines safe and effective or that the manufacturers do the right things in their vaccine development, production and testing
Despite knowing the issues, the EMA still approved the Pfizer vaccine for use and to be given to hundreds of millions of people in Europe, on 21st December 2020, stating on their website that, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (covid-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”. The EMA lied.

The leaked documents show that the regulators are not interested in your health or safety, but more into protecting their customers, being the pharma companies who pay big bucks to have their products approved to be given to the public. Major incidents which involve the quality and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines are being ignored or hidden from the public, so as to maintain the pandemic and vaccine sales.

The AZ vaccine clearly isn't safe, and the Pfizer vaccine doesn't contain the correct mRNA in up to 30% of batches... And now you know why so many people are having serious adverse events from both these experimental vaccines which have barely had any testing done (which should have found these issues, before they were approved to be given to the public).

Issues with the Pfizer vaccine defects should have been big news, but the media have said nothing, unlike for the AZ vaccine. Everyone needs to be made aware of this...

References:

British Medical Journal. (2021). The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability. Retrieved 26th March 2021 from www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n627

Gospa News. (2021). Pfizer Covid-Vaccines with “mRNA Flaws” in EU. Company and EMA concealed, but BMJ discovered. Retrieved 26th March 2021 from www.gospanews.net/en/2021/03/11/pfizer-covid-vaccines-with-mrna-flaws-in-eu-company-and-ema-concealed-but-bmj-discovered/

0 Comments

Vaccine passports were a conspiracy in 2020, now reality

9/4/2021

0 Comments

Israel recently became the pilot country to implement a "COVID passport" for proof of a COVID vaccination, in order to live or do anything. The government coercion for the vaccine (which is nationally and internationally illegal, but they still did it) was immense, and made worse with the implementation of the new COVID passport (their "Green Pass") for exclusive access to pretty much all services including buying a coffee, accessing gyms, hotels, concerts, and even buying food at cafes and restaurants being limited to those who have had their COVID shot... Air travel (without quarantine) outside of Israel will be restricted to the vaccinated soon (The Guardian, 2021).

And despite most of the population getting their COVID shot, albeit under extreme pressure, they STILL have to wear a mask, social distance, and other restrictions, even after getting the vaccine! So what's the point?

But now Europe are considering the same. Today, the European Commission were to vote on their own "Green Pass", a similar digital identity document for the purposes of identifying those who have had the COVID vaccine and to allow access to services and travel in the EU (European Commission, 2021).

The EU Green Pass will be used:
1) To show your COVID vaccine status
2) To show your COVID test results - whether you tested positive or negative, or if you have COVID antibodies after recovering from the infection
3) By all other EU states as needed, until the WHO calls and end to the pandemic
4) To facilitate movement (without quarantine) through the EU
5) To store personal information.

The European Commissioner for Justice said that the EU Green Pass "will not be a pre-condition to free movement and it will not discriminate in any way.", but I doubt that this will be their policy long-term, or if this is true at all. Even implementing such a passport to identify one part of the population and not others, and restricting use or access to services IS discriminatory.

I warned you about this in very early 2020, and Facebook fact checked it as false, despite the fact that I referenced press releases from companies who were developing the technology for this and were open about what it was to be used for.

There is still time to stop this medical fascism. Protest as much and loudly as you can, write and speak to your local, state and federal politicians, and anything else you can do to stop this happening. This is discrimination, and it is dividing the community, splitting family and friends, and is illegal coercion to comply without allowing for informed consent (ie, medical tyranny). The right for freedom of movement and access to services is a basic human right, and must be maintained.

Stay healthy!

References:
European Commission. (2021). Coronavirus: Commission proposes a Digital Green Certificate. Retrieved 25th March 2021 from ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_1181

The Guardian. (2021). Green pass: how are Covid vaccine passports working for Israel? Retrieved 25th March 2021 from www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/28/green-pass-how-are-vaccine-passports-working-in-israel

0 Comments

Astra-Zeneca vaccine banned or suspended from many countries due to safety concerns and severe adverse reactions

16/3/2021

0 Comments

More countries are suspending the AstraZeneca (AZ) COVID-19 vaccine due to serious adverse reactions. It has just been announced that Denmark, Norway and Iceland have suspended the rollout of the AZ vaccine due to many cases of blood clots occurring in patients after their vaccine (BBC News, 2021). While there is no proof yet of how the vaccine causes this, it is a known side effect of this vaccine.

Some people have even died after developing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) after receiving a dose of the AZ vaccine (BBC News, 2021). The UK's adverse events database also shows over 41 cases of strokes caused by blood clots, with 6 of them being fatal, after receiving the AZ vaccine. The same database shows another 13 cases of blood clots in the lungs, causing another death, and another 2 dozen cases of other types of blood clots also (UK Government, 2021b).

The AZ vaccine is also the one that Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt had on the weekend, and 2 days later he was in hospital with cellulitis, a serious and potentially life-threatening skin infection. Again, cellulitis is a known serious side effect of the AZ vaccine (see attached table, taken from the UK's adverse events register) (UK Government, 2021b).

Other countries have also banned or suspended the AZ vaccine due to safety concerns, now including Italy and Austria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Luxembourg (BBC News, 2021).

Previously, Switzerland banned the AZ vaccine due to safety concerns, and Germany banned it for similar reasons on being used for people over 65 years old.

None of this is entirely surprising really, as the AZ vaccine is causing over 60% more adverse reactions and deaths than the Pfizer vaccine, on a per dose comparison (UK Government, 2021a; UK Government, 2021b).

The media and health authorities have been quick to point out that there is "no evidence" of the COVID vaccines causing these adverse events. But, vaccines are the leading cause of coincidences!

Stay healthy!

References:

BBC News. (2021). Oxford-AstraZeneca: EU says 'no indication' vaccine linked to clots. Retrieved 12th March 2021 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56357760

UK Government. (2021a). COVID-19 mRNA PfizerBioNTech vaccine analysis print. Retrieved 9th February 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/.../COVID-19...

UK Government. (2021b). COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print. Retrieved 12th March 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/.../COVID-19...

0 Comments

a one world diet attempts to save the planet and feed the world but will cause more nutrient deficiencies and disease

16/3/2021

0 Comments

In 2019, I wrote a series of articles to critique the EAT-Lancet Commission report, on a proposed new "one world diet" which alleged to save the environment as well as feeding the world. It sounds like a great plan, except it had some massive holes and wouldn't work to achieve either goal. You can read my earlier articles on this plan here:

http://www.rosswalter.com.au/art.../category/eat-lancet-diet

The initial report received wide media coverage and praise until some independent investigations (including from me) found the the proposed new diet was woefully deficient in multiple nutrients (include vitamin B12, vitamin D, vitamin K, sodium, potassium, calcium, iron, omega-3 fats, protein and amino acids, and more!) which was not sustainable for anyone to avoid health conditions.

The EAT-Lancet diet was in effect an optional-almost-no-meat, plant-based diet, but included manufactured or highly processed plant-based foods. The extremely low animal products would comprise 1/5 of an egg, 2/3 of a fish finger, 1/4 of a rasher of bacon, 1/16 of a burger pattie, or 1.5 chicken nuggets! And even then, animal-based foods are optional! No wonder it was so nutrient deficient! A subsequent investigation into the financial requirements of the EAT-Lancet diet concluded that approximately 1.5 BILLION of the world's 7 billion population today would not be able to afford the EAT-Lancet diet! (Hirvonen, Bai, Headey & Masters, 2019). The EAT-Lancet new world diet was a failure.

EAT-Lancet is an interesting collaboration of the EAT Foundation Group, founded by a billionnaire vegan couple, and The Lancet, a medical and scientific journal. The EAT-Lancet Commission and report was funded by The Wellcome Trust, a charity with pharmaceutical company roots (Eat Forum, 2019). Almost all of the report's authors and contributors were vegans - it was a highly biased group, and their report showed this. The group is attempting to meet the Umited Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement (for climate change) (EAT-Lancet Commission, 2021).

Recently, EAT-Lancet group is back with a new report, full of wonderful quotes and proposals, which deserve to be investigated again, so here are some key points:

• They make many unsubstantiated claims why the future of the planet is dire if we don't all make huge changes to the food supply system and improving nutrition for everyone. They claim that a diet rich in plant-based foods and fewer animal sources will improve health and environmental benefits. But offers no scientific references to back this claim.
• They make no differentiation between organic or grass-fed animal sources of food, versus factory-raised (and grain-fed and other garbage-fed) animals or processed meats, which can give significant differences in health.
• They forget that animals IMPROVE the soil with nutrients and bacteria, and even sequester more "carbon" into the soil (and meat) from the air than what they give out. They also forget that roaming animals do not need vast clearing of native forests, unlike mass mono-plant agriculture (ie, plant farming is more damaging to the environment, than animal farming).
• They make no differentiation between highly processed factory-produced plant sources of food (ie plant protein, soy, GMOs etc) and fresh, whole plant foods.
• They make no mention of the huge transportation issues of getting plant foods to people, or encouraging many people with gardens to grow their own foods!
• Their dietary recommendations are still based on useless calories, but it can be used as a good comparison, for example they recommend 811 calories PER DAY from grains (wow! An epidemic of Diabetes here we come), 78 calories from vegetables, 153 calories from dairy (and never mind the many cultures who traditionally haven't accessed or consumed dairy, and shouldn't), just 30 calories from beef, lamb and pork, 62 from chicken, 19 from eggs (remember just 1/5 of one!), a huge 284 calories from legumes (and again many can't tolerate these or the pea protein powder it mostly comes from), and a whopping 354 from unsaturated plant-based oils, and even 120 calories PER DAY from sugar.
• Their aim is to double the consumption of plant-based foods (except starchy vegetables which are to be limited, despite them being rich source of fibre...), limit red meat (highly nutrient-dense), and with eggs, chicken and dairy being optional.
• Reducing food waste is a goal too, and a good one as up to 45% of food produced is wasted or thrown out because of picky choosing by supermarkets and other food companies, limited resources for picking or processing, not being consumed quickly enough, or other causes. However reducing waste is a much later goal, when it should be done first...

The EAT-Lancet Commission haven't learnt from their earlier failure - no change has been done to their original plan to fix the issues with their "new world diet", to correct the obvious and highly damaging nutrient deficiencies that are present in it. On one hand the report says it is about trying to improve food quality and quantity to feed everyone in a sustainable way, but doesn't actually provide the nutrients it claims.

With all the other political and health agendas going on at the moment and for the past 12 months, this is another part of it. A committee of a few people cannot realistically come up with a plan that will address or fix the entire planet or improve the health of the entire population. These co-called experts did a terrible job of putting together the original report and the "study" of their proposed "one world diet" being the EAT-Lancet diet, with massive issues that were found by independent investigations, but still haven't been fixed 2 years later. I'm sure these experts won't personally be relying on 1/5 of an egg for their daily animal-based protein intake...

This is a plan for CAUSING chronic nutrient deficiencies and disease in the ENTIRE population, while pretending to save the planet and improve health. Pretty much the same as another agenda going on at the moment...

Yes the food supply needs improving in many ways, but this diet or plan is not the way it can be done.

Stay healthy!

#foodcanfixit #fktheEATLancetdiet #fkthenewworlddiet

References:

EAT Forum. (2019). How was the EAT-Lancet Commission funded? Retrieved 8th March 2021 from https://eatforum.org/eat-lancet.../eat-lancet-funding/

EAT-Lancet Commission. (2021). Healthy Diets From Sustainable Food Systems: Summary Report from the EAT-Lancet Commission. Retrieved 6th March 2021 from https://eatforum.org/content/uploads/2019/01/EAT-Lancet_Commission_Summary_Report.pdf

Hirvonen, K., Bai, Y., Headey, D., & Masters, W.A. (2019). Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis. The Lancet, 8 (1), E59-E66. Doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4

0 Comments

To fix health issues you must find and fix the root causes

16/3/2021

0 Comments

I was recently interviewed by a colleague/lecturer for his podcast channel, on a topic of my choice - of a particular health topic that is a passion for me, and something unique... On the issue of finding and treating the root causes of all health conditions!

While this might not sound that unusual, most people don't really undersand this, or why their health issues aren't getting better despite having medical or alternative treatments.

Hippocrates, the father of modern medicine (and also of Naturopathic medicine) stated in his famous principles (amongst several others) to:

1) Treat the causes
2) Treat the whole body.

What people don't understand that this is not, and hasn't been for a LONG time, the medical model! The modern medical model is to:

1) Diagnose a condition after investigation of symptoms and testing
2) Treat the condition or symptoms with surgery or medications that remove or hide the symptoms
3) Treat everyone with that diagnosed condition or symptom the same!

How did the medical model get so far removed from the principles of Hippocrates?

The medical model can only "manage" your symptoms or conditions, and not actually treat them. Prescribed medications only hide symptoms but not actually fix the causes of them (because the causes are never investigated or found), so that symptoms are (sometimes) kept at bay only while you take the medications, but symptoms will return as soon as you stop taking them.

Prescribed medications also:

1) Push the issues deeper into the body and can cause worse symptoms over time, as the root causes are not treated
2) Cause side effects - ie, other symptoms, for which they will simply prescribe more medications to hide, which in turn cause more symptoms... Welcome to the pharmaceutic merry-go-round
3) Cause nutrient deficiencies, as medications often affect normal metabolic or digestive processes, leading to nutrient deficiencies, which in turn cause more symptoms and side effects.

In contrast, what I do is undertake a thorough and detailed investigation into all of your health issues, diet analysis of excesses vs deficiencies, lifestyle factors (stress, exercise, sleep), digestive system function, hormones, physical signs and symptoms, pathology analysis, and more!

I have developed a "root cause analysis prototol" which I then use to identify all of YOUR root causes as well as key symptoms that need treating, and put a treatment plan and recommendations together to quickly improve how you feel, as well as fixing all the root causes, which will return you to health and prevent issues into the future! In doing this, I am treating the whole body, as per Hippocrates' principles. It is a very different approach, but it works! Hence why I specialise in complex and chronic health issues, because I can find the root causes and get results, where doctors and other practitioners do not help you to improve.

Many times, the root causes can be very simple and easy to fix! But the root causes vary from one person to the next, even for people with the same diagnosed condition. Everyone is different!

If you are not happy with the progress of your "treatment", or if you feel that the root causes are not being found or treated, then please contact me for an investigation and advice that is specific to you! It is MOST important to find and fix the root causes, in order for you to get your health back, and to achieve your health goals!

Listen to my interview on the importance of finding and treating the root causes, now on the Humanley website:

https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode22

OR listen on Spotify;

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0AZxXvVogMQK8sKwwBXcri

Stay healthy!

0 Comments

Australia's TGA bans doctors from telling you which COVID-19 vaccine you will get

27/2/2021

7 Comments

Australia's medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), being a government organisation and therefore they do what the government tells them to do, has announced that they are banning health providers, doctors and pharmacists from revealing which COVID vaccine that people will get (News.com.au, 2021; TGA, 2021c).

The TGA are supposed to be responsible for ensuring that medicines etc are safe and effective, and protecting the Australian population from unsafe products. They are supposed to work for US.

Sadly the TGA have shown their true colours in this pandemic, starting back in early February 2020, when they released a warning to all health practitioners (medical and alternative) to not recommend any treatments or preventions for the coronavirus, unless there was specific published evidence for their use against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (TGA, 2020). They ignored and effectively banned many existing and effective antiviral and immune supporting preventions and treatments from being used, thus potentially killing many Australians as a result.

As the federal government promised to buy tens of millions of doses of COVID vaccines from different suppliers, all of them before those companies actually completed their clinical trials, the TGA recently granted PROVISIONAL approval for the use of the Pfizer and AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccines. This was despite the limited and pathetic testing done, and no independent testing being done by the TGA, the current vaccine rollout is still part of the TGA's ongoing investigations into the vaccines. Basically, the vaccine rollout is STILL part of the clinical trial (ie, experiment or testing) of the vaccines! And we are the lab rats.

The TGA also recently announced an unusual relaxing of labelling requirements to the COVID vaccines and packaging, to remove the vaccine name and manufacturer, as well as other warning and "POISON" notices that normally apply to vaccines (TGA, 2021a). We were told that this was because the initial vaccines would be imported into Australia wouldn't meet the TGA's requirements of labelling. That could have been easily fixed by the manufacturers printing new labels, but with their latest announcement of hiding the vaccine name from patients, it makes more sense that they were planning to hide the vaccine name all along.

I heard a RACGP (professional association for GPs) representative in a TV interview last week saying that health professionals in NSW would get the Pfizer vaccine, and everyone else will get the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine. But according to official government statistics from the UK, the Oxford/AZ vaccine is causing over 67% more serious adverse reactions and deaths than the Pfizer vaccine (UK Government, 2021a; UK Government, 2021b). Hands up if you want to get the more dangerous one? No-one? That's why they don't want you to know which one you will get...

The Pfizer vaccine is available in Australia but only in limited numbers - 10 million doses, compared to over 50 million doses each for the Oxford/AZ and Novavax vaccines (Australian Government Department of Health, 2021). It seems that the Pfizer vaccine is for the "special" people, but the far more dangerous Oxford/AZ vaccine will be for everyone else.

The TGA are now threatening doctors and medical clinics with huge fines and jail to prevent them from advertising which vaccine they have, the brand name, the ingredients (ie mRNA or other vaccine) or other information which may enable consumers to identify the particular vaccine.

Even worse is that the TGA have also banned health clinics and pharmacies from implying that the vaccines can cause harm (News.com.au, 2021). So they are banning "informed consent" to people to actually help them decide if they should get this vaccine or not? The human right of informed consent for medical treatments (in the Australian Constitution) says that informed consent MUST be given for someone to make a voluntary decision without coercion, to decide on any medical treatment or therapy. The TGA are (again) acting illegally here.

The TGA have a database for recording vaccine reactions and side effects, called the Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN). Actually they have TWO adverse events databases, with one internal system called AEMS (Adverse Event Management System) which records adverse event reports, but only after a period of 3 months does this internal-only data get transferred to the publicly-available DAEN database (TGA 2021b). Luckily other countries make their vaccine adverse reactions and deaths data available immediately so we can see how bad they are - although only a fraction of adverse events or deaths are reported, as the process is voluntary and doctors don't often add to it. Also, if you don't know which vaccine you get, how can you report an adverse event? Was this part of their plan all along?

Does this sound like the TGA are acting for the benefit of the Australian public and their health? Do you think that your government really cares about you or your health? Of course not. Are you still keen to line up for your Russian roulette shot of the more dangerous version of the COVID vaccine?

Stay healthy!

References:

Australian Government Department of Health (2021). Australia’s vaccine agreements. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.health.gov.au/node/18777/australias-vaccine-agreements

Newscorp. (2021). TGA bans pharmacies from revealing which COVID-19 vaccine they offer. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/tga-bans-pharmacies-from-revealing-which-covid19-vaccine-they-offer/news-story/8bcf3dea974537050600d7f87eb8e13c

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2020). Warning about products claiming to treat or prevent the novel coronavirus. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/warning-about-products-claiming-treat-or-prevent-novel-coronavirus

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021a). Therapeutic Goods (Poisons Standard) (COVID-19 Vaccine-Pfizer) Labelling Exemption 2021.
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021b). Reporting Adverse Events. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/reporting-adverse-events
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). (2021c). Advertising COVID-19 vaccines to the Australian public. Retrieved 26th February 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/advertising-covid-19-vaccines-australian-public?fbclid=IwAR0pl0FqOjRLM0eQwaZV5GiVLJen_2V1gVwo9RmCld5pJO7KCVVJrw-sMlc
UK Government. (2021a). COVID-19 mRNA PfizerBioNTech vaccine analysis print. Retrieved 9th February 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/964207/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print__1_.pdf
UK Government. (2021b). COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print. Retrieved 9th February 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/964208/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print__2_.pdf

7 Comments

<<Previous

COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers manipulate their clinical trial data to give false effectiveness % to get approval for use

TGA update as of 23-May-2021 (part 2) - TGA says death rates were not as high as expected?!

TGA Update as of 23-May-2021 shows many more deaths from the covid-19 vaccines than deaths from the virus in Australia

Facebook to no longer censor posts suggesting that the coronavirus was man-made

Research study finds plastic, heavy metals & more in rice

Why the COVID vaccines will not enable freedom or normality again

Is it worth dying for?

Authorities find links to AZ vaccine causing blood clots and platelet issues, and increased risks of these in women

New study finds no benefit from wearing masks for preventing coronavirus infection, but they cause many issues

Genocide of the elderly (Senicide/geronticide) - Part 1

COVID check-in app mandatory in hospitality venues (Big Brother is watching you)

Mortality rates in Australia in 2020 were far lower than in previous years. What pandemic?

Controversial or coincidental extension to Queensland's coronavirus state of emergency?

Brisbane coronavirus outbreak lockdown and masking

The European medicines regulator covered up issues with the Pfizer mRNA covid-19 vaccine

Vaccine passports were a conspiracy in 2020, now reality

Astra-Zeneca vaccine banned or suspended from many countries due to safety concerns and severe adverse reactions

a one world diet attempts to save the planet and feed the world but will cause more nutrient deficiencies and disease

To fix health issues you must find and fix the root causes

Australia's TGA bans doctors from telling you which COVID-19 vaccine you will get

COPYRIGHT

Archives

Categories